Comparison of resistance training among individuals living with diabetes, prediabetes, and without diabetes: 2017-2023 BRFSS.

IF 2.3
Anthony Figueroa, Ariella Palmieri, Lu Shi, Willie Leung
{"title":"Comparison of resistance training among individuals living with diabetes, prediabetes, and without diabetes: 2017-2023 BRFSS.","authors":"Anthony Figueroa, Ariella Palmieri, Lu Shi, Willie Leung","doi":"10.1016/j.pcd.2025.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to compare the weekly resistance training (RT) frequency between people with diabetes, prediabetes, and without diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 536,703 participants from 2017 to 2023 Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System were included in the analysis. Unadjusted and adjusted Poisson regression was performed to compare weekly resistance training frequency among participants with different diabetes statuses (without diabetes, prediabetes, and with diabetes).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>89.28 % (95 % CI [89.11, 89.45]) of participants did not have diabetes, 1.67 % (95 % CI [1.59, 1.73]) had prediabetes, and 9.10 % (95 % CI [8.91, 9.22]) had diabetes. Across the sample, the averages weekly RT frequency among the sample was 1.73 times (95 % CI [1.71, 1.74]). Participants without diabetes had the highest weekly RT frequency of 1.79 (95 % CI [1.71, 1.74]) times. Participants with prediabetes had the weekly RT frequency of 1.38 (95 % CI [1.26, 1.50]) times and participants with diabetes had the lowest average frequency between the three groups with 1.19 (95 % CI [1.15, 1.23]) times per week. The unadjusted and adjusted linear regression found that people with diabetes had less weekly RT frequency than participants without diabetes (β=-.60, p < .01; αβ=-.23, p < .01). Participants with prediabetes also had lower weekly RT frequency in the unadjusted regression compared to participants without diabetes (β=-.41, p < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>People with prediabetes and diabetes might face personal and environmental barriers in engaging in RT, leading to lower weekly RT frequency compared to those without diabetes. There is a need to overcome barriers and continue promote RT among people with and without diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94177,"journal":{"name":"Primary care diabetes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary care diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2025.09.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to compare the weekly resistance training (RT) frequency between people with diabetes, prediabetes, and without diabetes.

Methods: A total of 536,703 participants from 2017 to 2023 Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System were included in the analysis. Unadjusted and adjusted Poisson regression was performed to compare weekly resistance training frequency among participants with different diabetes statuses (without diabetes, prediabetes, and with diabetes).

Results: 89.28 % (95 % CI [89.11, 89.45]) of participants did not have diabetes, 1.67 % (95 % CI [1.59, 1.73]) had prediabetes, and 9.10 % (95 % CI [8.91, 9.22]) had diabetes. Across the sample, the averages weekly RT frequency among the sample was 1.73 times (95 % CI [1.71, 1.74]). Participants without diabetes had the highest weekly RT frequency of 1.79 (95 % CI [1.71, 1.74]) times. Participants with prediabetes had the weekly RT frequency of 1.38 (95 % CI [1.26, 1.50]) times and participants with diabetes had the lowest average frequency between the three groups with 1.19 (95 % CI [1.15, 1.23]) times per week. The unadjusted and adjusted linear regression found that people with diabetes had less weekly RT frequency than participants without diabetes (β=-.60, p < .01; αβ=-.23, p < .01). Participants with prediabetes also had lower weekly RT frequency in the unadjusted regression compared to participants without diabetes (β=-.41, p < .01).

Conclusion: People with prediabetes and diabetes might face personal and environmental barriers in engaging in RT, leading to lower weekly RT frequency compared to those without diabetes. There is a need to overcome barriers and continue promote RT among people with and without diabetes.

糖尿病、前驱糖尿病和非糖尿病患者抗阻训练的比较:2017-2023 BRFSS
目的:本研究旨在比较糖尿病患者、前驱糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者每周阻力训练(RT)的频率。方法:将2017 - 2023年行为危险因素监测系统共536703名参与者纳入分析。采用未经调整和调整的泊松回归来比较不同糖尿病状态(无糖尿病、糖尿病前期和糖尿病)的参与者每周阻力训练频率。结果:89.28 %(95 % CI[89.11, 89.45])的参与者没有糖尿病,1.67 %(95 % CI[1.59, 1.73])患有糖尿病前期,9.10 %(95 % CI[8.91, 9.22])患有糖尿病。在整个样本中,样本的平均每周RT频率为1.73次(95 % CI[1.71, 1.74])。无糖尿病的参与者每周RT频率最高,为1.79次(95 % CI[1.71, 1.74])。糖尿病前期患者的每周RT频率为1.38(95 % CI[1.26, 1.50])次,糖尿病患者的平均频率最低,为1.19(95 % CI[1.15, 1.23])次。未经调整和调整后的线性回归发现,糖尿病患者的每周RT频率低于非糖尿病患者(β=- 0.60, p )。结论:糖尿病前期和糖尿病患者在进行RT时可能面临个人和环境障碍,导致每周RT频率低于非糖尿病患者。有必要克服障碍,继续在糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者中推广RT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信