Evaluating the Impact of Ursodeoxycholic Acid on Hepatic Clearance of [99mTc]Tc-Sestamibi: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Elinaz Hosseinzadeh, Maryam Arefnia, Mohadeseh Bayat, Elham Ahmadi Basiri, Mohammadali Aldarraji, Mohammadali Ghodsirad
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of Ursodeoxycholic Acid on Hepatic Clearance of [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]Tc-Sestamibi: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.","authors":"Elinaz Hosseinzadeh, Maryam Arefnia, Mohadeseh Bayat, Elham Ahmadi Basiri, Mohammadali Aldarraji, Mohammadali Ghodsirad","doi":"10.1177/10849785251376736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Intense hepatobiliary uptake of [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]Tc-sestamibi in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) often degrades image quality by obscuring the inferior myocardial wall, leading to equivocal studies. While nonpharmacological interventions are inconsistent, the choleretic agent ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) could potentially accelerate hepatic clearance. The effectiveness of a convenient, single-dose UDCA intervention has not been rigorously evaluated. This study determines if a single oral dose of UDCA administered shortly before imaging could significantly improve hepatic clearance and enhance image quality in MPS. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 174 patients undergoing 1 d MPS were randomized. The intervention group (<i>n</i> = 87) received a single 300 mg oral dose of UDCA, whereas the control group (<i>n</i> = 87) received an identical placebo (300 mg vitamin C) 1 h before the stress radiotracer injection. All participants and interpreting physicians were blinded. Primary end points were the semiquantitative liver-to-background (L/B) and myocardium-to-liver (M/L) ratios from SPECT images. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Baseline characteristics were well-matched. The primary analysis revealed no statistically significant benefit from UDCA. The mean L/B ratio was 1.82 ± 0.45 in the UDCA group versus 1.89 ± 0.52 in the placebo group (<i>p</i> = 0.48). The mean M/L ratio was 1.15 ± 0.31 versus 1.11 ± 0.29, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.41). A <i>post hoc</i> power analysis revealed the study was underpowered to detect a small effect size. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> A single 300 mg oral dose of UDCA administered 1 h before stress imaging does not significantly improve hepatic clearance of [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]Tc-sestamibi or enhance M/L ratios. This is likely due to a pharmacokinetically insufficient regimen, as a single dose is unlikely to achieve the necessary biliary concentration for a significant choleretic effect. Future research should focus on alternative interventions or optimized UDCA dosing schedules, such as multiday protocols, combined with advanced imaging techniques like SPECT/CT, to conclusively determine effective strategies for improving MPS image quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":55277,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10849785251376736","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intense hepatobiliary uptake of [99mTc]Tc-sestamibi in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) often degrades image quality by obscuring the inferior myocardial wall, leading to equivocal studies. While nonpharmacological interventions are inconsistent, the choleretic agent ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) could potentially accelerate hepatic clearance. The effectiveness of a convenient, single-dose UDCA intervention has not been rigorously evaluated. This study determines if a single oral dose of UDCA administered shortly before imaging could significantly improve hepatic clearance and enhance image quality in MPS. Methods: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 174 patients undergoing 1 d MPS were randomized. The intervention group (n = 87) received a single 300 mg oral dose of UDCA, whereas the control group (n = 87) received an identical placebo (300 mg vitamin C) 1 h before the stress radiotracer injection. All participants and interpreting physicians were blinded. Primary end points were the semiquantitative liver-to-background (L/B) and myocardium-to-liver (M/L) ratios from SPECT images. Results: Baseline characteristics were well-matched. The primary analysis revealed no statistically significant benefit from UDCA. The mean L/B ratio was 1.82 ± 0.45 in the UDCA group versus 1.89 ± 0.52 in the placebo group (p = 0.48). The mean M/L ratio was 1.15 ± 0.31 versus 1.11 ± 0.29, respectively (p = 0.41). A post hoc power analysis revealed the study was underpowered to detect a small effect size. Conclusions: A single 300 mg oral dose of UDCA administered 1 h before stress imaging does not significantly improve hepatic clearance of [99mTc]Tc-sestamibi or enhance M/L ratios. This is likely due to a pharmacokinetically insufficient regimen, as a single dose is unlikely to achieve the necessary biliary concentration for a significant choleretic effect. Future research should focus on alternative interventions or optimized UDCA dosing schedules, such as multiday protocols, combined with advanced imaging techniques like SPECT/CT, to conclusively determine effective strategies for improving MPS image quality.

评价熊去氧胆酸对[99mTc]Tc-Sestamibi肝清除的影响:一项改善心肌灌注成像的随机对照试验
背景:在心肌灌注显像(MPS)中,[99mTc]Tc-sestamibi在肝胆上的强烈摄取往往会模糊心肌下壁,从而降低图像质量,导致研究结果模棱两可。虽然非药物干预不一致,但胆甾剂熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)可能会加速肝脏清除。便捷的单剂量UDCA干预的有效性尚未得到严格评估。本研究确定在成像前不久口服单剂量UDCA是否能显著改善MPS的肝脏清除率并提高图像质量。方法:在这项前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验中,174例接受1 d MPS的患者被随机分组。干预组(n = 87)接受单次300 mg口服UDCA,而对照组(n = 87)在注射应激放射性示踪剂前1小时接受相同的安慰剂(300 mg维生素C)。所有参与者和口译医师均采用盲法。主要终点是SPECT图像的半定量肝与背景(L/B)和心肌与肝脏(M/L)之比。结果:基线特征匹配良好。初步分析显示,UDCA没有统计学上显著的益处。UDCA组的平均L/B比为1.82±0.45,安慰剂组为1.89±0.52 (p = 0.48)。平均M/L比值分别为1.15±0.31和1.11±0.29 (p = 0.41)。事后功效分析显示,该研究的功效不足,无法检测到较小的效应大小。结论:应激显像前1小时单次口服300 mg UDCA不能显著改善[99mTc]Tc-sestamibi的肝脏清除率或提高M/L比值。这可能是由于药代动力学不足的方案,因为单剂量不太可能达到必要的胆道浓度,以达到显着的胆固醇作用。未来的研究应侧重于替代干预措施或优化UDCA给药计划,如多日方案,结合SPECT/CT等先进成像技术,最终确定提高MPS图像质量的有效策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
87
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals is the established peer-reviewed journal, with over 25 years of cutting-edge content on innovative therapeutic investigations to ultimately improve cancer management. It is the only journal with the specific focus of cancer biotherapy and is inclusive of monoclonal antibodies, cytokine therapy, cancer gene therapy, cell-based therapies, and other forms of immunotherapies. The Journal includes extensive reporting on advancements in radioimmunotherapy, and the use of radiopharmaceuticals and radiolabeled peptides for the development of new cancer treatments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信