Clinical Impacts of Minimally Invasive Transperineal Abdominoperineal Resection in Crohn's Disease: A Retrospective Analysis

IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Yoshitaka Kondo, Nobuhiko Kanaya, Ryohei Shoji, Toshihiro Inokuchi, Sakiko Hiraoka, Yusuke Yoshida, Yuki Matsumi, Kunitoshi Shigeyasu, Fuminori Teraishi, Shinji Kuroda, Toshiyoshi Fujiwara
{"title":"Clinical Impacts of Minimally Invasive Transperineal Abdominoperineal Resection in Crohn's Disease: A Retrospective Analysis","authors":"Yoshitaka Kondo,&nbsp;Nobuhiko Kanaya,&nbsp;Ryohei Shoji,&nbsp;Toshihiro Inokuchi,&nbsp;Sakiko Hiraoka,&nbsp;Yusuke Yoshida,&nbsp;Yuki Matsumi,&nbsp;Kunitoshi Shigeyasu,&nbsp;Fuminori Teraishi,&nbsp;Shinji Kuroda,&nbsp;Toshiyoshi Fujiwara","doi":"10.1111/ases.70149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Crohn's disease (CD) often leads to complex anorectal complications, posing significant challenges in surgical management. Transperineal abdominoperineal resection (TpAPR) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to APR. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TpAPR compared to APR in patients with CD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 19 CD patients who underwent either minimally invasive TpAPR (<i>n</i> = 11) or APR (<i>n</i> = 8) between 2008 and 2023 from a single institution. The primary outcomes were assessed: intraoperative blood loss, operative time, and surgical site infection (SSI) rates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The minimally invasive TpAPR group exhibited significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss (223 mL vs. 533 mL, <i>p</i> = 0.04) and a lower incidence of SSI rates (36.4% vs. 75%, <i>p</i> = 0.07). Operative time and hospital stay were comparable between groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Minimally invasive TpAPR demonstrates potential benefits over APR in reducing blood loss and SSI rates in CD patients. Further large-scale studies are warranted to confirm these findings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ases.70149","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ases.70149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Crohn's disease (CD) often leads to complex anorectal complications, posing significant challenges in surgical management. Transperineal abdominoperineal resection (TpAPR) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to APR. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TpAPR compared to APR in patients with CD.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 19 CD patients who underwent either minimally invasive TpAPR (n = 11) or APR (n = 8) between 2008 and 2023 from a single institution. The primary outcomes were assessed: intraoperative blood loss, operative time, and surgical site infection (SSI) rates.

Results

The minimally invasive TpAPR group exhibited significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss (223 mL vs. 533 mL, p = 0.04) and a lower incidence of SSI rates (36.4% vs. 75%, p = 0.07). Operative time and hospital stay were comparable between groups.

Conclusion

Minimally invasive TpAPR demonstrates potential benefits over APR in reducing blood loss and SSI rates in CD patients. Further large-scale studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

微创经会阴腹会阴切除术治疗克罗恩病的临床效果:回顾性分析。
克罗恩病(CD)经常导致复杂的肛肠并发症,对手术治疗提出了重大挑战。经会阴腹会阴切除术(TpAPR)已成为一种可替代APR的微创手术。本研究旨在评估TpAPR与APR在CD患者中的安全性和有效性。方法:回顾性分析2008年至2023年间来自一家机构的19例CD患者,他们分别接受了微创TpAPR (n = 11)或APR (n = 8)。评估主要结局:术中出血量、手术时间和手术部位感染(SSI)率。结果:微创TpAPR组术中出血量明显减少(223 mL vs. 533 mL, p = 0.04), SSI发生率明显降低(36.4% vs. 75%, p = 0.07)。两组间手术时间和住院时间具有可比性。结论:与APR相比,微创TpAPR在减少CD患者失血和SSI发生率方面具有潜在的优势。需要进一步的大规模研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信