Employee perspectives on genetic testing in the workplace: Results from a national survey.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
J Scott Roberts, Wendy R Uhlmann, Drew Blasco, Anya E R Prince, Sarah McCain, Subhamoy Pal, Kunal Sanghavi, Elizabeth Charnysh, Charles Lee
{"title":"Employee perspectives on genetic testing in the workplace: Results from a national survey.","authors":"J Scott Roberts, Wendy R Uhlmann, Drew Blasco, Anya E R Prince, Sarah McCain, Subhamoy Pal, Kunal Sanghavi, Elizabeth Charnysh, Charles Lee","doi":"10.1159/000548116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Genetic testing for health-related purposes is now offered in some workplace wellness programs, with notable ethical, legal, and social implications. However, little is known about employee perspectives on workplace genetic testing (wGT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed a large, diverse national sample of 2,000 employed adults (mean age=43 years; 51% female). Survey measures assessed respondents' wGT beliefs, perceptions of employer motivations for offering wGT, and privacy concerns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most respondents (57.4%) agreed that wGT would improve employees' health, and 46.7% agreed it could aid recruitment and retention of employees. Many respondents attributed legally prohibited motivations to employers offering wGT, including charging employees higher insurance premiums based on wGT results (28.8% rated as very important to employers). Overall, 37% of respondents were not at all comfortable with their employer collecting their genetic information; in addition, most (83.6%) were somewhat or very concerned their employer would fail to protect the privacy of their genetic information or would share such information without permission (79.2%). Heightened privacy concerns were positively associated with employee characteristics including age > 55 years, self-identified Black or Asian race and ethnicity, and family history of common diseases, and inversely associated with prior genetic testing experience and employer trust.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Employees perceive potential health benefits of wGT but harbor substantial privacy concerns and show limited awareness of legal protections against employer misuse of wGT results. Findings suggest a need for robust employee education and informed consent in wGT, along with safeguarding of sensitive personal genetic information.</p>","PeriodicalId":49650,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Genomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12431634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Genetic testing for health-related purposes is now offered in some workplace wellness programs, with notable ethical, legal, and social implications. However, little is known about employee perspectives on workplace genetic testing (wGT).

Methods: We surveyed a large, diverse national sample of 2,000 employed adults (mean age=43 years; 51% female). Survey measures assessed respondents' wGT beliefs, perceptions of employer motivations for offering wGT, and privacy concerns.

Results: Most respondents (57.4%) agreed that wGT would improve employees' health, and 46.7% agreed it could aid recruitment and retention of employees. Many respondents attributed legally prohibited motivations to employers offering wGT, including charging employees higher insurance premiums based on wGT results (28.8% rated as very important to employers). Overall, 37% of respondents were not at all comfortable with their employer collecting their genetic information; in addition, most (83.6%) were somewhat or very concerned their employer would fail to protect the privacy of their genetic information or would share such information without permission (79.2%). Heightened privacy concerns were positively associated with employee characteristics including age > 55 years, self-identified Black or Asian race and ethnicity, and family history of common diseases, and inversely associated with prior genetic testing experience and employer trust.

Conclusions: Employees perceive potential health benefits of wGT but harbor substantial privacy concerns and show limited awareness of legal protections against employer misuse of wGT results. Findings suggest a need for robust employee education and informed consent in wGT, along with safeguarding of sensitive personal genetic information.

员工对工作场所基因检测的看法:一项全国性调查的结果。
在一些工作场所的健康计划中,现在提供了与健康相关的基因检测,具有显著的伦理、法律和社会影响。然而,员工对职场基因检测(wGT)的看法却知之甚少。方法:我们调查了2000名就业成年人(平均年龄为43岁,51%为女性)的大型、多样化的全国样本。调查措施评估了受访者的wGT信念,雇主提供wGT动机的看法,以及隐私问题。结果:大多数受访者(57.4%)认为wGT可以改善员工的健康状况,46.7%的受访者认为它可以帮助招聘和留住员工。许多受访者将法律禁止的动机归因于雇主提供wGT,包括根据wGT结果向员工收取更高的保险费(28.8%的受访者认为这对雇主非常重要)。总体而言,37%的受访者对雇主收集他们的基因信息一点也不放心;此外,大多数(83.6%)受访者有些或非常担心雇主未能保护他们的基因资料私隐,或会在未经允许的情况下分享有关资料(79.2%)。对隐私的高度关注与员工特征呈正相关,包括年龄在50至55岁之间、自认为是黑人或亚洲人的种族和民族、常见疾病的家族史,与先前的基因检测经历和雇主信任呈负相关。结论:员工意识到wGT的潜在健康益处,但对隐私有很大的担忧,并且对防止雇主滥用wGT结果的法律保护意识有限。研究结果表明,需要对wGT进行强有力的员工教育和知情同意,同时保护敏感的个人遗传信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Genomics
Public Health Genomics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Public Health Genomics'' is the leading international journal focusing on the timely translation of genome-based knowledge and technologies into public health, health policies, and healthcare as a whole. This peer-reviewed journal is a bimonthly forum featuring original papers, reviews, short communications, and policy statements. It is supplemented by topic-specific issues providing a comprehensive, holistic and ''all-inclusive'' picture of the chosen subject. Multidisciplinary in scope, it combines theoretical and empirical work from a range of disciplines, notably public health, molecular and medical sciences, the humanities and social sciences. In so doing, it also takes into account rapid scientific advances from fields such as systems biology, microbiomics, epigenomics or information and communication technologies as well as the hight potential of ''big data'' for public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信