Occupational Therapists' perspectives of implementing a new rehabilitation intervention for visual field loss due to stroke.

NIHR open research Pub Date : 2025-07-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3310/nihropenres.13984.1
Christine Hazelton, Sam Harding, Jayne Angilley, Alexandra Palombi, Audrey Bowen, Phil Clatworthy
{"title":"Occupational Therapists' perspectives of implementing a new rehabilitation intervention for visual field loss due to stroke.","authors":"Christine Hazelton, Sam Harding, Jayne Angilley, Alexandra Palombi, Audrey Bowen, Phil Clatworthy","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13984.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators of implementing rehabilitation interventions for visual field loss due to stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was a qualitative exploration using one-to-one interviews coded using template analysis and the COM-B a-priori framework. Participants were five occupational therapists from hospital (n=4) and community (n=1) National Health Service (NHS) stroke care settings in England. The intervention experienced by the participant was a standardized goal-based visual scanning and search training for stroke survivors with visual field loss, delivered by occupational therapists (OTs), supported by information sheets and a dedicated website (HABIT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HABIT provides a structured approach for delivering scanning and visual search training. HABIT resources aided participants' understanding and self-management. HABIT was considered similar to current practice as practiced by study participants and of most value to trainees and newly qualified therapists. However, resources had limited accessibility due to a lack of computer access and difficulty in reading text; modifications were required to make training activity examples more suitable for ward settings. Within ward settings, the delivery of HABIT was highly limited by time constraints; therapists ranked activities linked to safety and early discharge as higher priority. Clinicians noted that stroke survivors' lack of awareness of their visual loss and its impact limited their engagement with the HABIT, making delivery difficult.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prioritization of vision rehabilitation in highly pressurized acute settings is a key factor in implementing HABIT. The findings will enable further refinement of HABIT content and delivery to address the barriers identified and improve its suitability in acute hospital settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"5 ","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417978/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIHR open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13984.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators of implementing rehabilitation interventions for visual field loss due to stroke.

Methods: The study was a qualitative exploration using one-to-one interviews coded using template analysis and the COM-B a-priori framework. Participants were five occupational therapists from hospital (n=4) and community (n=1) National Health Service (NHS) stroke care settings in England. The intervention experienced by the participant was a standardized goal-based visual scanning and search training for stroke survivors with visual field loss, delivered by occupational therapists (OTs), supported by information sheets and a dedicated website (HABIT).

Results: HABIT provides a structured approach for delivering scanning and visual search training. HABIT resources aided participants' understanding and self-management. HABIT was considered similar to current practice as practiced by study participants and of most value to trainees and newly qualified therapists. However, resources had limited accessibility due to a lack of computer access and difficulty in reading text; modifications were required to make training activity examples more suitable for ward settings. Within ward settings, the delivery of HABIT was highly limited by time constraints; therapists ranked activities linked to safety and early discharge as higher priority. Clinicians noted that stroke survivors' lack of awareness of their visual loss and its impact limited their engagement with the HABIT, making delivery difficult.

Conclusion: Prioritization of vision rehabilitation in highly pressurized acute settings is a key factor in implementing HABIT. The findings will enable further refinement of HABIT content and delivery to address the barriers identified and improve its suitability in acute hospital settings.

职业治疗师对脑卒中导致的视野丧失实施一种新的康复干预的观点。
背景:本研究旨在探讨脑卒中后视野丧失患者实施康复干预的障碍和促进因素。方法:采用一对一访谈的定性研究方法,采用模板分析和COM-B先验框架编码。参与者是5名来自医院(n=4)和社区(n=1)的英国国民健康服务(NHS)中风护理机构的职业治疗师。参与者所经历的干预是一个标准化的基于目标的视觉扫描和搜索训练,为视野丧失的中风幸存者提供,由职业治疗师(OTs)提供,由信息表和专用网站(HABIT)提供支持。结果:HABIT提供了一种结构化的方法来进行扫描和视觉搜索训练。习惯资源有助于参与者的理解和自我管理。习惯被认为与研究参与者目前的实践相似,对受训人员和新合格的治疗师最有价值。然而,由于缺乏计算机接入和阅读文本困难,资源的可及性有限;需要修改,使培训活动的例子更适合病房的设置。在病房环境中,习惯的提供受到时间限制的高度限制;治疗师将与安全和尽早出院相关的活动列为优先事项。临床医生指出,中风幸存者缺乏对视力丧失及其影响的认识,限制了他们与习惯的接触,使分娩变得困难。结论:在高压急性环境下优先进行视力康复是实施习惯的关键因素。研究结果将有助于进一步完善《习惯》的内容和实施,以解决已确定的障碍,并提高其在急性医院环境中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信