Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Content on TikTok: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Popular #PTSD Posts.

IF 1.1
Brittany Rohl, Laura Carolyn Jones, Rachel Nattis, Robert Dale Claar, Xavier Velez, Joy Gabrielli, John Williamson, Eric Porges
{"title":"Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Content on TikTok: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Popular #PTSD Posts.","authors":"Brittany Rohl, Laura Carolyn Jones, Rachel Nattis, Robert Dale Claar, Xavier Velez, Joy Gabrielli, John Williamson, Eric Porges","doi":"10.2196/71209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>TikTok became an increasingly popular platform for mental health discussions during a major global stressor (COVID-19 pandemic). On TikTok, content assumed to promote user engagement is delivered in a hyperindividually curated manner through a proprietary algorithm. Mental health providers have raised concerns about TikTok's potential role in promoting inaccurate self-diagnoses, pathologizing normal behaviors, and fostering new-onset symptoms after exposure to illness-related content, such as tic-like movements linked to conversion or factitious disorders. The accuracy of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-related content with respect to conveying symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment deserves further investigation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to characterize the accuracy of PTSD-related TikTok content.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In February 2022, a search was conducted on TikTok using the hashtag #PTSD, and the 100 most-liked videos were retrieved. Videos were excluded if they were in a non-English language, duplicated, unrelated to PTSD, lacked audio, or contained nonfunctioning links. A publicly available Python package (TikTokPy) was used to scrape available metadata (views, shares, etc). Using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-AV), videos were independently coded by 2 reviewers for the overall accuracy of the video (useful, personal experience, or misleading), whether the creator self-identified as a health care professional, symptoms mentioned, and overall video understandability and actionability. A third reviewer was consulted in the rare instances of coding disagreements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 100 included videos, 29 were classified as useful, 59 were classified as personal experience (subjective experience without outright inaccuracies), and 12 were classified as misleading. The degree to which PTSD-related information was accurate was not associated with its understandability, actionability, or user engagement. Besides useful videos being longer (mean 88.7, SD 63.1 seconds) than personal experience videos (mean 42.7, SD 44.5 seconds), no group differences in video metadata were observed across the number of views, likes, shares, or comments (P>.05). While self-identified HCPs were more likely to post useful content, they also contributed to 33% (4/12) of misleading videos. Changes in cognition and mood were the most frequently reported symptoms of PTSD (38/100, 38% of videos).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings were roughly consistent with previous studies of mental health-related TikTok content accuracy, although this is variable by diagnosis. TikTok's continuously adaptive algorithmic content delivery may expose users to nonspecific and potentially misleading \"click-bait\" mental health information, which could influence symptom interpretation and clinical presentation. Clinicians should be aware of the digital landscape shaping patients' perceptions of PTSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":74345,"journal":{"name":"Online journal of public health informatics","volume":"17 ","pages":"e71209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online journal of public health informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/71209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: TikTok became an increasingly popular platform for mental health discussions during a major global stressor (COVID-19 pandemic). On TikTok, content assumed to promote user engagement is delivered in a hyperindividually curated manner through a proprietary algorithm. Mental health providers have raised concerns about TikTok's potential role in promoting inaccurate self-diagnoses, pathologizing normal behaviors, and fostering new-onset symptoms after exposure to illness-related content, such as tic-like movements linked to conversion or factitious disorders. The accuracy of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-related content with respect to conveying symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment deserves further investigation.

Objective: This study aimed to characterize the accuracy of PTSD-related TikTok content.

Methods: In February 2022, a search was conducted on TikTok using the hashtag #PTSD, and the 100 most-liked videos were retrieved. Videos were excluded if they were in a non-English language, duplicated, unrelated to PTSD, lacked audio, or contained nonfunctioning links. A publicly available Python package (TikTokPy) was used to scrape available metadata (views, shares, etc). Using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-AV), videos were independently coded by 2 reviewers for the overall accuracy of the video (useful, personal experience, or misleading), whether the creator self-identified as a health care professional, symptoms mentioned, and overall video understandability and actionability. A third reviewer was consulted in the rare instances of coding disagreements.

Results: Of the 100 included videos, 29 were classified as useful, 59 were classified as personal experience (subjective experience without outright inaccuracies), and 12 were classified as misleading. The degree to which PTSD-related information was accurate was not associated with its understandability, actionability, or user engagement. Besides useful videos being longer (mean 88.7, SD 63.1 seconds) than personal experience videos (mean 42.7, SD 44.5 seconds), no group differences in video metadata were observed across the number of views, likes, shares, or comments (P>.05). While self-identified HCPs were more likely to post useful content, they also contributed to 33% (4/12) of misleading videos. Changes in cognition and mood were the most frequently reported symptoms of PTSD (38/100, 38% of videos).

Conclusions: Our findings were roughly consistent with previous studies of mental health-related TikTok content accuracy, although this is variable by diagnosis. TikTok's continuously adaptive algorithmic content delivery may expose users to nonspecific and potentially misleading "click-bait" mental health information, which could influence symptom interpretation and clinical presentation. Clinicians should be aware of the digital landscape shaping patients' perceptions of PTSD.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

TikTok上的创伤后应激障碍内容:流行的PTSD帖子的横断面分析。
背景:在全球主要压力源(COVID-19大流行)期间,TikTok成为越来越受欢迎的心理健康讨论平台。在TikTok上,旨在提高用户参与度的内容通过专有算法以超个人策划的方式传递。心理健康服务提供者对TikTok可能会促进不准确的自我诊断、将正常行为病态化,以及在接触与疾病相关的内容(如与转换或人为障碍有关的抽搐样动作)后培养新发作的症状表示担忧。创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)相关内容在表达症状、诊断和治疗方面的准确性值得进一步研究。目的:本研究旨在表征ptsd相关TikTok内容的准确性。方法:2022年2月,在TikTok上使用#PTSD标签进行搜索,检索出100个最受欢迎的视频。如果视频是非英语的、重复的、与创伤后应激障碍无关的、缺乏音频或包含无效链接,则将其排除在外。一个公开可用的Python包(TikTokPy)被用来抓取可用的元数据(视图、共享等)。使用患者教育材料视听材料评估工具(PEMAT-AV),视频由2名审稿人独立编码,以评估视频的总体准确性(有用、个人经验或误导性)、创作者是否自认为是卫生保健专业人员、所提到的症状以及视频的总体可理解性和可操作性。在编码分歧的罕见情况下,咨询了第三位审稿人。结果:在收录的100个视频中,29个被归类为有用的,59个被归类为个人经验(没有完全不准确的主观经验),12个被归类为误导。ptsd相关信息的准确程度与其可理解性、可操作性或用户参与度无关。除了有用视频(平均88.7秒,SD 63.1秒)比个人体验视频(平均42.7秒,SD 44.5秒)更长,视频元数据在观看、喜欢、分享或评论的数量上没有组间差异(P>.05)。虽然自我认定的hcp更有可能发布有用的内容,但他们也贡献了33%(4/12)的误导性视频。认知和情绪变化是最常见的PTSD症状(38/100,38%的视频)。结论:我们的发现与之前关于心理健康相关的TikTok内容准确性的研究大致一致,尽管这因诊断而异。TikTok持续自适应的算法内容传递可能会让用户接触到非特定的、可能具有误导性的“点击诱饵”心理健康信息,这可能会影响症状解释和临床表现。临床医生应该意识到数字景观正在塑造患者对创伤后应激障碍的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信