Presentation of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with antithrombotic therapy, results from a consecutive retrospective cohort.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Aipi Forsberg-Puckett, Gabriele Wurm Johansson, Sara Regnér
{"title":"Presentation of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with antithrombotic therapy, results from a consecutive retrospective cohort.","authors":"Aipi Forsberg-Puckett, Gabriele Wurm Johansson, Sara Regnér","doi":"10.1186/s13049-025-01431-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antithrombotic treatment might affect bleeding symptoms, identification of bleeding source and treatment for patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding. This study aims to investigate possible differences in initial bleeding symptoms, identified bleeding site and treatment of patients with or without antithrombotic medication admitted for gastrointestinal bleeding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive adult patients primarily admitted for gastrointestinal bleeding at Skane University Hospital between 2018-01-01 and 2019-06-31, were included in this study. Data was retrospectively extracted from medical files. Patients were stratified according to antithrombotic therapy (antiplatelet or oral anticoagulants) on admittance or not. Groups were compared using Fisher's exact test, Mann Whitney U-test, Kruskal-Wallis test and logistic regression analysis, including interaction models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>585 patients were included. Median age was 75 years and a majority (58%) were male. In total, 269 (46%) patients had no antithrombotic medication and 316 (54%) had some kind of antithrombotic medication. Patients with antithrombotic therapy had a higher age and Charlson comorbidity index than those without antithrombotic therapy. However, comparing patients with anticoagulants, antiplatelet medication and no antithrombotics, hemoglobin at arrival (median (interquartile range (IQR)) 99(75-130), 103(85-125) and 100(80-128) respectively, p = 0.851) and Shock index (0.65 (0.50-0.83), 0.67(0.53-0.81) and 0.66 (0.57-0.80) respectively, p = 0.529) did not differ between the groups. Patients with antithrombotic therapy more often presented with hematochezia alone (35.3% and 32.2% for anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications, respectively, 23% for those with no antithrombotics p = 0.017) and less frequently with hematemesis compared to patients with no antithrombotic therapy (14.7% and 24.6%, respectively, 33.1% in those with no antithrombotics, p < 0.001). Predicted probabilities of receiving endoscopic treatment, need for transfusion, and number of units transfused did not differ between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with anticoagulant therapy more often present with a lower source of Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding than both those on antiplatelet medications and those with no antithrombotics. However, the presentation of bleeding is similar regardless of any antithrombotic medication or not.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05195697), 19/01/2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":49292,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"146"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12421751/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-025-01431-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antithrombotic treatment might affect bleeding symptoms, identification of bleeding source and treatment for patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding. This study aims to investigate possible differences in initial bleeding symptoms, identified bleeding site and treatment of patients with or without antithrombotic medication admitted for gastrointestinal bleeding.

Methods: All consecutive adult patients primarily admitted for gastrointestinal bleeding at Skane University Hospital between 2018-01-01 and 2019-06-31, were included in this study. Data was retrospectively extracted from medical files. Patients were stratified according to antithrombotic therapy (antiplatelet or oral anticoagulants) on admittance or not. Groups were compared using Fisher's exact test, Mann Whitney U-test, Kruskal-Wallis test and logistic regression analysis, including interaction models.

Results: 585 patients were included. Median age was 75 years and a majority (58%) were male. In total, 269 (46%) patients had no antithrombotic medication and 316 (54%) had some kind of antithrombotic medication. Patients with antithrombotic therapy had a higher age and Charlson comorbidity index than those without antithrombotic therapy. However, comparing patients with anticoagulants, antiplatelet medication and no antithrombotics, hemoglobin at arrival (median (interquartile range (IQR)) 99(75-130), 103(85-125) and 100(80-128) respectively, p = 0.851) and Shock index (0.65 (0.50-0.83), 0.67(0.53-0.81) and 0.66 (0.57-0.80) respectively, p = 0.529) did not differ between the groups. Patients with antithrombotic therapy more often presented with hematochezia alone (35.3% and 32.2% for anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications, respectively, 23% for those with no antithrombotics p = 0.017) and less frequently with hematemesis compared to patients with no antithrombotic therapy (14.7% and 24.6%, respectively, 33.1% in those with no antithrombotics, p < 0.001). Predicted probabilities of receiving endoscopic treatment, need for transfusion, and number of units transfused did not differ between groups.

Conclusions: Patients with anticoagulant therapy more often present with a lower source of Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding than both those on antiplatelet medications and those with no antithrombotics. However, the presentation of bleeding is similar regardless of any antithrombotic medication or not.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05195697), 19/01/2022.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一项连续回顾性队列研究显示,接受抗栓治疗的患者出现胃肠道出血。
背景:抗血栓治疗可能影响急性消化道出血患者的出血症状、出血来源的识别和治疗。本研究旨在探讨胃肠道出血患者在初始出血症状、确定出血部位和治疗方面可能存在的差异。方法:纳入2018年1月1日至2019年6月31日在Skane大学附属医院连续收治的以消化道出血为主的成人患者。资料回顾性地从医学档案中提取。患者根据入院与否的抗血栓治疗(抗血小板或口服抗凝药物)进行分层。各组间比较采用Fisher精确检验、Mann Whitney u检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验和logistic回归分析,包括相互作用模型。结果:纳入585例患者。中位年龄为75岁,大多数(58%)为男性。总共有269例(46%)患者没有抗血栓药物治疗,316例(54%)患者有某种抗血栓药物治疗。接受抗栓治疗的患者年龄和Charlson合并症指数高于未接受抗栓治疗的患者。然而,与使用抗凝药物、抗血小板药物和未使用抗血栓药物的患者相比,两组患者到达时血红蛋白(中位数(四分位数间距(IQR))分别为99(75-130)、103(85-125)和100(80-128),p = 0.851)和休克指数(分别为0.65(0.50-0.83)、0.67(0.53-0.81)和0.66 (0.57-0.80),p = 0.529)无差异。与未接受抗血栓治疗的患者相比,接受抗血栓治疗的患者更容易出现单独的便血(抗凝和抗血小板药物组分别为35.3%和32.2%,未使用抗血栓药物组为23%,p = 0.017),而出现呕血的频率更低(分别为14.7%和24.6%,未使用抗血栓药物组为33.1%,p。与服用抗血小板药物和未服用抗血栓药物的患者相比,接受抗凝治疗的患者胃肠道出血的发生率更低。然而,无论是否使用抗血栓药物,出血的表现都是相似的。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05195697), 19/01/2022。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary topics of interest in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (SJTREM) are the pre-hospital and early in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of emergency medicine, trauma, and resuscitation. Contributions focusing on dispatch, major incidents, etiology, pathophysiology, rehabilitation, epidemiology, prevention, education, training, implementation, work environment, as well as ethical and socio-economic aspects may also be assessed for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信