Prism Model: Factors that Influence Teaming in Behavioral Health from the Perspectives of Interprofessional Clinicians.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Julie Berrett-Abebe, Jocelyn Novella, Michelle Pagnotta
{"title":"Prism Model: Factors that Influence Teaming in Behavioral Health from the Perspectives of Interprofessional Clinicians.","authors":"Julie Berrett-Abebe, Jocelyn Novella, Michelle Pagnotta","doi":"10.1007/s11414-025-09964-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This qualitative study explores what factors influence teaming in behavioral health settings, from the perspective of behavioral health providers. Twenty-four participants from a range of behavioral health professions engaged in semi-structured interviews. Using a grounded theory approach, data were analyzed, and a \"prism\" model was developed to capture the complexities of behavioral health providers' perceptions of factors influencing teaming in various mental health and/or substance use disorder treatment programs. Specific model components included: behavioral health context, individual factors, navigating disciplinary-specific approaches, workplace structures, communication as a \"throughline,\" and varied perceptions of teaming. The prism model is dynamic, acknowledging the role of the individual in the system while also recognizing that participant perceptions of teaming are shaped by environmental and contextual forces. Each pathway is singular, with a variety of interacting factors. A key finding is that while teaming was viewed positively, there was no shared understanding of what teaming meant or whether it was occurring. The article concludes with implications for behavioral health education and practice, including support for new models of behavioral health care that incentivize teaming, expand community supports and peer workforce, prioritize the goals of recovery and wellness, and provide opportunities for more flexible financing.</p>","PeriodicalId":49040,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-025-09964-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This qualitative study explores what factors influence teaming in behavioral health settings, from the perspective of behavioral health providers. Twenty-four participants from a range of behavioral health professions engaged in semi-structured interviews. Using a grounded theory approach, data were analyzed, and a "prism" model was developed to capture the complexities of behavioral health providers' perceptions of factors influencing teaming in various mental health and/or substance use disorder treatment programs. Specific model components included: behavioral health context, individual factors, navigating disciplinary-specific approaches, workplace structures, communication as a "throughline," and varied perceptions of teaming. The prism model is dynamic, acknowledging the role of the individual in the system while also recognizing that participant perceptions of teaming are shaped by environmental and contextual forces. Each pathway is singular, with a variety of interacting factors. A key finding is that while teaming was viewed positively, there was no shared understanding of what teaming meant or whether it was occurring. The article concludes with implications for behavioral health education and practice, including support for new models of behavioral health care that incentivize teaming, expand community supports and peer workforce, prioritize the goals of recovery and wellness, and provide opportunities for more flexible financing.

棱镜模型:跨专业临床医生视角下影响行为健康团队合作的因素。
本定性研究从行为健康提供者的角度探讨了影响行为健康环境中团队合作的因素。来自一系列行为健康专业的24名参与者参与了半结构化访谈。采用基于理论的方法,对数据进行了分析,并开发了一个“棱镜”模型,以捕捉行为健康提供者对各种心理健康和/或物质使用障碍治疗项目中影响团队的因素的看法的复杂性。具体的模型组成部分包括:行为健康背景、个人因素、导航特定学科的方法、工作场所结构、作为“贯穿线”的沟通以及对团队的不同看法。棱镜模型是动态的,它承认个人在系统中的作用,同时也认识到参与者对团队的看法是由环境和背景力量塑造的。每个途径都是单一的,有各种相互作用的因素。一个关键的发现是,虽然人们对团队合作持积极态度,但对于团队合作的含义或是否正在发生却没有共同的理解。文章总结了对行为健康教育和实践的启示,包括支持行为卫生保健的新模式,以激励团队合作,扩大社区支持和同伴劳动力,优先考虑康复和健康目标,并提供更灵活的融资机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal examines the organization, financing, delivery and outcomes of behavioral health services (i.e., alcohol, drug abuse, and mental disorders), providing practical and empirical contributions to and explaining the implications for the broader behavioral health field. Each issue includes an overview of contemporary concerns and recent developments in behavioral health policy and management through research articles, policy perspectives, commentaries, brief reports, and book reviews. This journal is the official publication of the National Council for Behavioral Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信