The Constituents of Trust in the Context of Return to Work Following a Work Disability: A Scoping Review and a Thematic Analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Hermann B T Tegninko, Marie-Michelle Gouin
{"title":"The Constituents of Trust in the Context of Return to Work Following a Work Disability: A Scoping Review and a Thematic Analysis.","authors":"Hermann B T Tegninko, Marie-Michelle Gouin","doi":"10.1007/s10926-025-10327-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Trust is key to a successful return to work following a work disability. Its constituents, which have been widely documented in social and management sciences research, are not addressed in return to work (RTW) research. This study therefore aims to portray the constituents of trust that have been documented in the context of RTW following an absence due to musculoskeletal disorder or a common mental disorder.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A scoping review was performed using Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and the PRISMA extension for scoping review guidelines. Studies were extracted from six databases using keywords like trust, RTW/disability, and musculoskeletal/common mental disorders. Study selection and analysis were conducted in Covidence by two reviewers independently. An Excel framework served to record the constituents of trust (i.e., antecedents, attributes, and consequences) identified in accordance with a thematic analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the 2795 references extracted, 30 studies were selected, 73% of which were published in the Last 10 years. All three constituents were documented, mainly in the dyadic relationship between the worker returning to work and other stakeholders. Yet, some known antecedents of trust remain underexplored and new consequences emerge. Support also appears to be both an antecedent and a consequence, which encourages reflection on the possibility of trust reciprocity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the constituents of trust involved in RTW were documented, they should be tested empirically, and some constituents and relationships need further exploration. Recommendations to improve trust between stakeholders are proposed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-025-10327-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Trust is key to a successful return to work following a work disability. Its constituents, which have been widely documented in social and management sciences research, are not addressed in return to work (RTW) research. This study therefore aims to portray the constituents of trust that have been documented in the context of RTW following an absence due to musculoskeletal disorder or a common mental disorder.

Method: A scoping review was performed using Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and the PRISMA extension for scoping review guidelines. Studies were extracted from six databases using keywords like trust, RTW/disability, and musculoskeletal/common mental disorders. Study selection and analysis were conducted in Covidence by two reviewers independently. An Excel framework served to record the constituents of trust (i.e., antecedents, attributes, and consequences) identified in accordance with a thematic analysis approach.

Results: From the 2795 references extracted, 30 studies were selected, 73% of which were published in the Last 10 years. All three constituents were documented, mainly in the dyadic relationship between the worker returning to work and other stakeholders. Yet, some known antecedents of trust remain underexplored and new consequences emerge. Support also appears to be both an antecedent and a consequence, which encourages reflection on the possibility of trust reciprocity.

Conclusion: While the constituents of trust involved in RTW were documented, they should be tested empirically, and some constituents and relationships need further exploration. Recommendations to improve trust between stakeholders are proposed.

在工作残疾后重返工作岗位的背景下信任的组成部分:范围审查和专题分析。
目的:信任是工作残疾后成功重返工作岗位的关键。在社会和管理科学研究中广泛记录的它的组成部分没有在工作回报(RTW)研究中得到解决。因此,本研究旨在描述由于肌肉骨骼疾病或常见精神疾病而缺席的RTW背景下记录的信任成分。方法:采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的方法和PRISMA扩展的范围审查指南进行范围审查。研究使用信任、RTW/残疾和肌肉骨骼/常见精神障碍等关键词从六个数据库中提取。在covid中,研究选择和分析由两名审稿人独立进行。Excel框架用于记录信任的组成部分(即,根据主题分析方法确定的先决条件、属性和后果)。结果:从提取的2795篇文献中,选择了30篇研究,其中73%发表于近10年。所有三个组成部分都被记录下来,主要是工人重返工作岗位和其他利益相关者之间的二元关系。然而,一些已知的信任的前因后果仍未得到充分探索,新的后果不断出现。支持似乎既是前提也是结果,这鼓励人们思考信任互惠的可能性。结论:虽然RTW中涉及的信任成分已被记录,但它们还需要实证检验,一些成分和关系还需要进一步探索。提出了改善利益相关者之间信任的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on the rehabilitation, reintegration, and prevention of disability in workers. The journal offers investigations involving original data collection and research synthesis (i.e., scoping reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses). Papers derive from a broad array of fields including rehabilitation medicine, physical and occupational therapy, health psychology and psychiatry, orthopedics, oncology, occupational and insurance medicine, neurology, social work, ergonomics, biomedical engineering, health economics, rehabilitation engineering, business administration and management, and law.  A single interdisciplinary source for information on work disability rehabilitation, the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation helps to advance the scientific understanding, management, and prevention of work disability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信