A core physiologically based toxicokinetic (PBTK) model for exposure assessment of multiple environmental phenols

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Jeong Weon Choi , Seungho Lee , Jangwoo Lee , Mi-Yeon Shin , Sungkyoon Kim
{"title":"A core physiologically based toxicokinetic (PBTK) model for exposure assessment of multiple environmental phenols","authors":"Jeong Weon Choi ,&nbsp;Seungho Lee ,&nbsp;Jangwoo Lee ,&nbsp;Mi-Yeon Shin ,&nbsp;Sungkyoon Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.toxlet.2025.111722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Environmental phenols are widely used in consumer products and are of increasing concern due to their potential endocrine-disrupting effects. Physiologically based toxicokinetic (PBTK) models offer a powerful tool for estimating human exposure by translating biomonitoring data into external intake values. However, conventional PBTK models are typically chemical-specific and resource-intensive. In this study, we developed a core human PBTK model capable of describing the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) of four groups of environmental phenols—parabens (MeP, EtP, PrP), bisphenols (BPA, BPS), triclosan (TCS), and benzophenone-3 (BP-3)—based on shared toxicokinetic characteristics.</div><div>The model was calibrated and validated using human volunteer data and applied to urinary biomonitoring data from 3787 Korean adults in the Korean National Environmental Health Survey (KoNEHS 2015–2017). Estimated daily intakes (EDIs) for MeP, EtP, PrP, and BPA were estimated via reverse dosimetry and compared with values derived from the conventional fractional urinary excretion (<em>F</em><sub><em>ue</em></sub>) method. Median EDIs derived from the PBTK model were 3.7, 4.8, 0.4, and 0.02 μg/kg-bw/day for MeP, EtP, PrP, and BPA, respectively, and showed good agreement with <em>F</em><sub><em>ue</em></sub> based estimates.</div><div>The core model successfully captured blood and urinary concentration profiles across multiple phenols, demonstrating its potential as a practical and scalable framework for exposure assessment. Furthermore, the model was used in a reverse dosimetry framework to estimate human exposure levels from urinary biomonitoring data. This approach can be particularly valuable when chemical-specific models are unavailable, offering an efficient alternative for interpreting biomonitoring data in environmental health risk assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23206,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology letters","volume":"413 ","pages":"Article 111722"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology letters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378427425026621","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental phenols are widely used in consumer products and are of increasing concern due to their potential endocrine-disrupting effects. Physiologically based toxicokinetic (PBTK) models offer a powerful tool for estimating human exposure by translating biomonitoring data into external intake values. However, conventional PBTK models are typically chemical-specific and resource-intensive. In this study, we developed a core human PBTK model capable of describing the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) of four groups of environmental phenols—parabens (MeP, EtP, PrP), bisphenols (BPA, BPS), triclosan (TCS), and benzophenone-3 (BP-3)—based on shared toxicokinetic characteristics.
The model was calibrated and validated using human volunteer data and applied to urinary biomonitoring data from 3787 Korean adults in the Korean National Environmental Health Survey (KoNEHS 2015–2017). Estimated daily intakes (EDIs) for MeP, EtP, PrP, and BPA were estimated via reverse dosimetry and compared with values derived from the conventional fractional urinary excretion (Fue) method. Median EDIs derived from the PBTK model were 3.7, 4.8, 0.4, and 0.02 μg/kg-bw/day for MeP, EtP, PrP, and BPA, respectively, and showed good agreement with Fue based estimates.
The core model successfully captured blood and urinary concentration profiles across multiple phenols, demonstrating its potential as a practical and scalable framework for exposure assessment. Furthermore, the model was used in a reverse dosimetry framework to estimate human exposure levels from urinary biomonitoring data. This approach can be particularly valuable when chemical-specific models are unavailable, offering an efficient alternative for interpreting biomonitoring data in environmental health risk assessment.
多种环境酚暴露评估的核心生理毒性动力学(PBTK)模型。
环境酚被广泛应用于消费品中,由于其潜在的内分泌干扰作用而日益受到关注。基于生理学的毒物动力学(PBTK)模型通过将生物监测数据转化为外部摄入量值,为估计人体暴露提供了强有力的工具。然而,传统的PBTK模型通常是特定化学品和资源密集型的。在这项研究中,我们建立了一个核心的人类PBTK模型,能够描述四组环境酚类物质-对羟基苯甲酸酯(MeP, EtP, PrP),双酚类(BPA, BPS),三氯生(TCS)和二苯甲酮-3 (BP-3)的吸收,分布,代谢和排泄(ADME)基于共同的毒性动力学特征。该模型使用人类志愿者数据进行了校准和验证,并应用于韩国国家环境健康调查(KoNEHS 2015-2017)中3787名韩国成年人的尿液生物监测数据。通过反向剂量法估计MeP、EtP、PrP和BPA的估计日摄入量(EDIs),并与传统的分数尿排泄(Fue)法得出的值进行比较。PBTK模型得出的MeP、EtP、PrP和BPA的平均EDIs分别为3.7、4.8、0.4和0.02μg/kg-bw/day,与基于Fue的估计结果吻合良好。该核心模型成功捕获了多种酚的血液和尿液浓度谱,证明了其作为一种实用且可扩展的暴露评估框架的潜力。此外,该模型被用于反向剂量学框架,以根据尿液生物监测数据估计人体暴露水平。在没有特定化学品模型的情况下,这种方法尤其有价值,为解释环境健康风险评估中的生物监测数据提供了一种有效的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Toxicology letters
Toxicology letters 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
897
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: An international journal for the rapid publication of novel reports on a range of aspects of toxicology, especially mechanisms of toxicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信