Older Chinese migrants' experiences of remote primary care in England: interview study.

IF 2 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-09-10 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0106
Haoyue Guo, Rachael Frost, Greta Rait, Fiona Burns
{"title":"Older Chinese migrants' experiences of remote primary care in England: interview study.","authors":"Haoyue Guo, Rachael Frost, Greta Rait, Fiona Burns","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over the past decade, remote (non-face-to-face) services are being increasingly used in primary care, including interactions through telephone and online platforms. These services bring potential benefits as well as potential barriers for patients. Older migrants are a population that could face intersectional barriers when accessing healthcare; it is important to understand the impact of remote services on them.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study explores older Chinese migrants' experiences of and attitudes to primary care access through remote services.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>This is a qualitative interview study. Participants were self-identified ethnically Chinese individuals over 60 years old, recruitment was carried out through community organisations, social media, and snowballing in 2023.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were purposively sampled for maximum variation in socio-demographics and backgrounds. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews in English and Mandarin. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim; where recording was not consented to, field notes were taken. Transcripts and field notes were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results were shared with participants for verification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen participants were interviewed. Many technical and practical barriers exist for the participants when accessing remote primary care. Due to the different levels of access to resources, these barriers impact the most disadvantaged people the most. In addition, participants feel the need for in-person interactions to address concerns and believe remote services should not replace in-person care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, older Chinese migrants feel few benefits from using remote primary care services. In the current digital context of the NHS, it is crucial to keep multimodal services available while rolling out new service modes and consider the needs of different populations to ensure equity in access.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Over the past decade, remote (non-face-to-face) services are being increasingly used in primary care, including interactions through telephone and online platforms. These services bring potential benefits as well as potential barriers for patients. Older migrants are a population that could face intersectional barriers when accessing healthcare; it is important to understand the impact of remote services on them.

Aim: This study explores older Chinese migrants' experiences of and attitudes to primary care access through remote services.

Design & setting: This is a qualitative interview study. Participants were self-identified ethnically Chinese individuals over 60 years old, recruitment was carried out through community organisations, social media, and snowballing in 2023.

Method: Participants were purposively sampled for maximum variation in socio-demographics and backgrounds. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews in English and Mandarin. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim; where recording was not consented to, field notes were taken. Transcripts and field notes were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results were shared with participants for verification.

Results: Nineteen participants were interviewed. Many technical and practical barriers exist for the participants when accessing remote primary care. Due to the different levels of access to resources, these barriers impact the most disadvantaged people the most. In addition, participants feel the need for in-person interactions to address concerns and believe remote services should not replace in-person care.

Conclusions: Overall, older Chinese migrants feel few benefits from using remote primary care services. In the current digital context of the NHS, it is crucial to keep multimodal services available while rolling out new service modes and consider the needs of different populations to ensure equity in access.

中国老年移民在英国接受远程初级保健的经历:访谈研究。
背景:在过去十年中,远程(非面对面)服务越来越多地用于初级保健,包括通过电话和在线平台进行互动。这些服务给患者带来了潜在的好处,也带来了潜在的障碍。老年移民是在获得医疗保健时可能面临交叉障碍的人群;了解远程服务对它们的影响非常重要。目的:本研究探讨中国老年移民通过远程服务获得初级保健服务的经验和态度。设计与设置:这是一个定性访谈研究。参与者是60岁以上的华人,通过社区组织、社交媒体和2023年滚雪球的方式进行招募。方法:有目的地对参与者进行抽样,以最大限度地改变社会人口统计学和背景。数据是通过半结构化的英语和普通话访谈收集的。采访被逐字记录和转录;在不同意录音的情况下,进行了现场记录。使用反身性专题分析分析笔录和实地记录。结果与参与者共享以进行验证。结果:对19名参与者进行了访谈。参与者在获得远程初级保健时存在许多技术和实际障碍。由于获取资源的水平不同,这些障碍对最弱势群体的影响最大。此外,参与者认为需要面对面的互动来解决问题,并认为远程服务不应取代面对面的护理。结论:总体而言,中国老年移民认为使用远程初级保健服务没有什么好处。在目前NHS的数字化背景下,在推出新服务模式的同时,保持多式联运服务的可用性,并考虑不同人群的需求,以确保公平获取,这一点至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信