Comparative analysis of Birmingham hip resurfacing: Minimum 2-year follow-up clinical outcomes in obese vs. non-obese populations.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Roger Quesada-Jimenez, Elizabeth G Walsh, Ady H Kahana-Rojkind, Benjamin D Kuhns, Andrew R Schab, Benjamin G Domb
{"title":"Comparative analysis of Birmingham hip resurfacing: Minimum 2-year follow-up clinical outcomes in obese vs. non-obese populations.","authors":"Roger Quesada-Jimenez, Elizabeth G Walsh, Ady H Kahana-Rojkind, Benjamin D Kuhns, Andrew R Schab, Benjamin G Domb","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2025.07.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>With obese individuals experiencing osteoarthritis (OA) at early stages of life, hip resurfacing (HR) has emerged as an alternative to arthroplasty. The purpose is to conduct a short-term analysis on patients with obesity who underwent primary HR for OA compared to a benchmark control group of non-obese patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 who underwent HR from 2010 to 2021 were eligible for inclusion. Included patients had pre-operative and minimum 2-year follow-up for the Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement Score (HOOS-JR), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS), and patient satisfaction or reached an endpoint revision surgery during the study time frame. Patients were propensity matched in a 1:1 ratio based on approach, age, and follow-up time. Clinically relevant outcome thresholds, sports participation, acetabular cup placement, complications, and conversions to total hip arthroplasty (THA) were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy patients were included. Obese patients displayed significant improvements across all patient reported outcomes (PROs) and high patient satisfaction at short-term follow-up that was comparable to the non-obese group. Both groups also showed a similar return to sport and acetabular cup placement and met clinically relevant thresholds at similar rates. The obese group, specifically patients with a BMI>35, exhibited higher complication and revision surgery rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HR in patients with obesity showed significant short-term improvements, allowing a high percentage of patients to return to sports. These results were equivalent to a benchmark control group of non-obese patients. Additionally, obese patients tended to have an increased risk of complications than non-obese patients, with a higher rate of conversion to THA. Level of EvidenceLevel of Evidence III.</p>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2025.07.012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: With obese individuals experiencing osteoarthritis (OA) at early stages of life, hip resurfacing (HR) has emerged as an alternative to arthroplasty. The purpose is to conduct a short-term analysis on patients with obesity who underwent primary HR for OA compared to a benchmark control group of non-obese patients.

Materials and methods: Patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 who underwent HR from 2010 to 2021 were eligible for inclusion. Included patients had pre-operative and minimum 2-year follow-up for the Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement Score (HOOS-JR), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS), and patient satisfaction or reached an endpoint revision surgery during the study time frame. Patients were propensity matched in a 1:1 ratio based on approach, age, and follow-up time. Clinically relevant outcome thresholds, sports participation, acetabular cup placement, complications, and conversions to total hip arthroplasty (THA) were included in the analysis.

Results: Seventy patients were included. Obese patients displayed significant improvements across all patient reported outcomes (PROs) and high patient satisfaction at short-term follow-up that was comparable to the non-obese group. Both groups also showed a similar return to sport and acetabular cup placement and met clinically relevant thresholds at similar rates. The obese group, specifically patients with a BMI>35, exhibited higher complication and revision surgery rate.

Conclusions: HR in patients with obesity showed significant short-term improvements, allowing a high percentage of patients to return to sports. These results were equivalent to a benchmark control group of non-obese patients. Additionally, obese patients tended to have an increased risk of complications than non-obese patients, with a higher rate of conversion to THA. Level of EvidenceLevel of Evidence III.

伯明翰髋关节置换术的比较分析:肥胖与非肥胖人群至少2年的随访临床结果。
背景和目的:肥胖个体在生命早期经历骨关节炎(OA),髋关节表面置换(HR)已成为关节置换术的替代方案。目的是对因OA而接受原发性HR治疗的肥胖患者与非肥胖患者的基准对照组进行短期分析。材料和方法:2010年至2021年接受HR治疗的体重指数(BMI)≥30 kg/m2的患者符合纳入条件。纳入的患者在术前和至少2年的随访中进行了改良哈里斯髋关节评分(mHHS)、髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结局评分、关节置换评分(HOOS-JR)、遗忘关节评分(FJS)、疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)和患者满意度,或在研究期间完成了终点翻修手术。患者根据治疗方法、年龄和随访时间按1:1的比例进行倾向匹配。临床相关结果阈值、运动参与、髋臼杯放置、并发症和全髋关节置换术(THA)纳入分析。结果:纳入70例患者。与非肥胖组相比,肥胖患者在所有患者报告结果(PROs)中表现出显著的改善,在短期随访中患者满意度也很高。两组患者均表现出相似的运动恢复和髋臼杯放置,并以相似的比率达到临床相关阈值。肥胖组,特别是BMI为bbb35的患者,出现了更高的并发症和翻修手术率。结论:肥胖患者的HR在短期内有显著改善,使高比例的患者恢复运动。这些结果与非肥胖患者的基准对照组相当。此外,肥胖患者比非肥胖患者出现并发症的风险更高,其转化为THA的比率更高。证据水平证据水平
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信