Subcutaneous Opioids: Under the Skin Irritation or New Standard of Care?

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alexis Beachy, Lynn Aung, Natalie Malone, Amy Durell, Zak Tressel, Tommy Petros, Kerry Bertke
{"title":"Subcutaneous Opioids: Under the Skin Irritation or New Standard of Care?","authors":"Alexis Beachy, Lynn Aung, Natalie Malone, Amy Durell, Zak Tressel, Tommy Petros, Kerry Bertke","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.08.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioids are widely used for pain management in hospitalized adults and can be administered through various routes. While oral (PO) and intravenous (IV) routes remain most common, the subcutaneous (SUB-Q) route is underutilized despite historical safety and supporting literature.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This quality improvement study implemented a revised standard of practice (SOP) for opioid administration, promoting the PO route when feasible and SUB-Q as the preferred parenteral route. IV remained available when clinically appropriate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This pilot study was conducted on a 24-bed adult general medicine unit at a large community teaching hospital. Extensive interdisciplinary education was provided prior to SOP implementation. Primary outcomes evaluated IV and SUB-Q opioid administrations. Secondary outcomes analyzed total opioid administrations (all routes), mean oral morphine equivalents (OMEs), and mean patient-reported pain scores (0-10 scale). All outcomes were measured per patient day (PPD) during the first five days of admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IV opioid administration decreased by 33% while overall opioid consumption (OMEs) was modestly reduced. Statistically significant reductions in average pain scores were observed postintervention on days one and five.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of a new opioid SOP was associated with reduced IV opioid use while maintaining effective pain control across both groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.08.047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Opioids are widely used for pain management in hospitalized adults and can be administered through various routes. While oral (PO) and intravenous (IV) routes remain most common, the subcutaneous (SUB-Q) route is underutilized despite historical safety and supporting literature.

Objective: This quality improvement study implemented a revised standard of practice (SOP) for opioid administration, promoting the PO route when feasible and SUB-Q as the preferred parenteral route. IV remained available when clinically appropriate.

Methods: This pilot study was conducted on a 24-bed adult general medicine unit at a large community teaching hospital. Extensive interdisciplinary education was provided prior to SOP implementation. Primary outcomes evaluated IV and SUB-Q opioid administrations. Secondary outcomes analyzed total opioid administrations (all routes), mean oral morphine equivalents (OMEs), and mean patient-reported pain scores (0-10 scale). All outcomes were measured per patient day (PPD) during the first five days of admission.

Results: IV opioid administration decreased by 33% while overall opioid consumption (OMEs) was modestly reduced. Statistically significant reductions in average pain scores were observed postintervention on days one and five.

Conclusions: Implementation of a new opioid SOP was associated with reduced IV opioid use while maintaining effective pain control across both groups.

皮下阿片类药物:皮下刺激还是新的护理标准?
背景:阿片类药物广泛用于住院成人的疼痛管理,可通过多种途径给药。虽然口服(PO)和静脉(IV)途径仍然是最常见的,但皮下(SUB-Q)途径尽管具有历史安全性和支持文献,但尚未得到充分利用。目的:本质量改进研究实施修订后的阿片类药物给药操作标准(SOP),在可行的情况下推广PO途径,并将SUB-Q作为首选的肠外给药途径。当临床需要时,静脉注射仍然可用。方法:本初步研究在某大型社区教学医院24张床位的成人普通医学单元进行。在SOP实施之前提供广泛的跨学科教育。主要结果评估静脉和亚q阿片类药物给药。次要结果分析了阿片类药物总给药量(所有途径)、平均口服吗啡当量(OMEs)和患者报告的平均疼痛评分(0-10分)。所有结果均在入院前5天按患者日(PPD)进行测量。结果:静脉注射阿片类药物减少了33%,而总体阿片类药物消耗量(OMEs)略有减少。在干预后的第1天和第5天,观察到平均疼痛评分有统计学意义的降低。结论:在两组中,实施新的阿片类药物SOP与减少静脉注射阿片类药物使用有关,同时保持有效的疼痛控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信