Effectiveness of the SHARE Approach for Improving Clinician Shared Decision Making Skills: A Trial in 12 Practices Located in Colorado, USA.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Laura D Scherer, Daniel Matlock, Christopher Knoepke, Robyn Wearner, Allyson Gottsman, Douglas Fernald, W Perry Dickinson, L Miriam Dickinson, Monica McNulty, Mark Gritz
{"title":"Effectiveness of the SHARE Approach for Improving Clinician Shared Decision Making Skills: A Trial in 12 Practices Located in Colorado, USA.","authors":"Laura D Scherer, Daniel Matlock, Christopher Knoepke, Robyn Wearner, Allyson Gottsman, Douglas Fernald, W Perry Dickinson, L Miriam Dickinson, Monica McNulty, Mark Gritz","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09465-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The SHARE Approach Model and training curriculum was developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to teach clinicians practicing in diverse settings how to engage in more effective Shared Decision Making (SDM).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effectiveness of the SHARE Approach at improving SDM in practices located across Colorado, USA.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A longitudinal study with pre- and post-intervention observations.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Primary care and cardiology practices were recruited from across Colorado. All practice staff were invited to participate in the SHARE Approach training. Patients and providers from these practices participated in SDM assessments.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The 4-h SHARE Approach training was led by a practice facilitator and consisted of didactic lectures, demonstration videos, group discussion, and group activities.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Primary outcome measures included (1) evaluation of the training and confidence/understanding in doing SDM using a survey questionnaire of practice staff, (2) patient and clinician-reported SDM occurring in clinical encounters, and (3) SDM captured in audio recordings of a subset of clinical encounters. SDM was hypothesized to improve at post-intervention and maintain gains at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Ten primary care and two cardiology practices enrolled in the study, located across major regions of Colorado (e.g., Western slope; Eastern plains; front range) and representing diverse practice types (e.g., independent; health system; federally qualified health center). Trainee confidence and understanding of SDM and confidence in ability to engage in SDM improved at post-test and maintained gains at follow-up. Patient- and clinician-reported SDM occurring in clinical encounters did not improve significantly at post-intervention or follow-up. SDM observed on audio recordings did improve at the 6-month follow-up observation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reports the largest and most comprehensive evaluation of AHRQ's SHARE Approach training curriculum. The training was positively received by clinicians and may improve SDM behaviors in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09465-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The SHARE Approach Model and training curriculum was developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to teach clinicians practicing in diverse settings how to engage in more effective Shared Decision Making (SDM).

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of the SHARE Approach at improving SDM in practices located across Colorado, USA.

Design: A longitudinal study with pre- and post-intervention observations.

Participants: Primary care and cardiology practices were recruited from across Colorado. All practice staff were invited to participate in the SHARE Approach training. Patients and providers from these practices participated in SDM assessments.

Intervention: The 4-h SHARE Approach training was led by a practice facilitator and consisted of didactic lectures, demonstration videos, group discussion, and group activities.

Main measures: Primary outcome measures included (1) evaluation of the training and confidence/understanding in doing SDM using a survey questionnaire of practice staff, (2) patient and clinician-reported SDM occurring in clinical encounters, and (3) SDM captured in audio recordings of a subset of clinical encounters. SDM was hypothesized to improve at post-intervention and maintain gains at follow-up.

Key results: Ten primary care and two cardiology practices enrolled in the study, located across major regions of Colorado (e.g., Western slope; Eastern plains; front range) and representing diverse practice types (e.g., independent; health system; federally qualified health center). Trainee confidence and understanding of SDM and confidence in ability to engage in SDM improved at post-test and maintained gains at follow-up. Patient- and clinician-reported SDM occurring in clinical encounters did not improve significantly at post-intervention or follow-up. SDM observed on audio recordings did improve at the 6-month follow-up observation.

Conclusions: This study reports the largest and most comprehensive evaluation of AHRQ's SHARE Approach training curriculum. The training was positively received by clinicians and may improve SDM behaviors in clinical practice.

SHARE方法提高临床医生共同决策技能的有效性:美国科罗拉多州12个实践的试验。
背景:SHARE方法模型和培训课程是由医疗保健研究和质量机构(AHRQ)开发的,旨在教授在不同环境中执业的临床医生如何参与更有效的共享决策(SDM)。目的:确定SHARE方法在改善美国科罗拉多州SDM实践中的有效性。设计:一项具有干预前后观察的纵向研究。参与者:初级保健和心脏病学实践是从科罗拉多州招募的。所有实习人员都被邀请参加SHARE方法培训。来自这些实践的患者和提供者参与了SDM评估。干预:4小时的SHARE方法培训由一名实践促进者领导,包括教学讲座、演示视频、小组讨论和小组活动。主要措施:主要结果措施包括(1)通过对执业人员的调查问卷评估进行SDM的培训和信心/理解,(2)患者和临床医生报告的临床遭遇中发生的SDM,以及(3)临床遭遇子集的音频记录中捕获的SDM。假设SDM在干预后改善,并在随访中保持增益。主要结果:10个初级保健和2个心脏病学实践参与了这项研究,位于科罗拉多州的主要地区(例如,西部斜坡;东部平原;前山脉),代表了不同的实践类型(例如,独立的;卫生系统;联邦合格的卫生中心)。学员对SDM的信心和理解以及参与SDM的能力的信心在测试后得到了提高,并在随访中保持了增长。患者和临床医生报告的临床接触中发生的SDM在干预后或随访中没有显著改善。在6个月的随访观察中,录音观察到的SDM确实有所改善。结论:本研究报告了AHRQ的SHARE方法培训课程的最大和最全面的评估。临床医生积极接受培训,并可能在临床实践中改善SDM行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信