Effects of Injury Registry Data on Policymaking, Hospitalizations, and Mortality: Systematic Review.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ana Cláudia Medeiros-de-Souza, Luana Emanuelly Sinhori Lopes, Tayna Felicissimo Gomes de Souza Bandeira, Lucas Reis Correia, Naiza Nayla Bandeira de Sá, Bruno Zocca de Oliveira
{"title":"Effects of Injury Registry Data on Policymaking, Hospitalizations, and Mortality: Systematic Review.","authors":"Ana Cláudia Medeiros-de-Souza, Luana Emanuelly Sinhori Lopes, Tayna Felicissimo Gomes de Souza Bandeira, Lucas Reis Correia, Naiza Nayla Bandeira de Sá, Bruno Zocca de Oliveira","doi":"10.2196/67115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Brazilian project, launched in 2021, aims to establish a nationwide injury registry that systematically collects detailed information on incidents and individuals across the country, regardless of injury severity. The registry integrates information from prehospital and hospital care, various health systems lacking interoperability, and data from sectors such as firefighters and police. Its primary aim is to enhance health surveillance by providing timely, high-quality information that guides prevention strategies and informs policymaking. In addition, the project seeks to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with injuries.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effects of injury registry data on policymaking, hospitalization rates or duration, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The systematic review followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, with a protocol registered in PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, CRD42023481528). A total of 5 databases were searched in November 2023, with an update conducted in March 2024, incorporating reference lists from the studies included. Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, resolving disagreements with a third reviewer. Studies were eligible if they reported results related to the implementation and use of injury or trauma registry data for at least one outcome of interest, while those based on other sources were excluded. Synthesis of findings was presented in tables, and the observed results were reported as number or percentage differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 9100 studies retrieved, 3951 were excluded due to duplication, leaving 5149 for selection, with 15 full texts reviewed. Only 5 studies met the inclusion criteria, highlighting a notable scarcity of research on the effects or results of registry data on injury outcomes. It is important to note that the studies included reflect correlations rather than causalities, and there are currently no publications on impact. The findings suggest that injury and trauma registries have the potential to inform policymaking, which can lead to enhanced health outcomes. One study noted a 3-day reduction in intensive care unit stay (from 16 to 13 days; P<.05) and a 4% reduction in expected hospital mortality (from 17.5% to 21.5%) for patients with an Injury Severity Score ≥16, while another showed a 42% annual decrease in traffic injury hospital admissions (from 45 to 16). Significant methodological heterogeneity and the small number of studies limited the feasibility of a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Establishing an injury registry in Brazil presents a significant opportunity to enhance health outcomes through informed policymaking. While it is crucial to set appropriate expectations regarding its effects on morbidity and mortality, particularly concerning the causality and transportability of the findings to the Brazilian context, its role in facilitating preventive measures and improving surveillance capabilities remains valuable.</p>","PeriodicalId":14765,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Public Health and Surveillance","volume":"11 ","pages":"e67115"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422531/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Public Health and Surveillance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/67115","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Brazilian project, launched in 2021, aims to establish a nationwide injury registry that systematically collects detailed information on incidents and individuals across the country, regardless of injury severity. The registry integrates information from prehospital and hospital care, various health systems lacking interoperability, and data from sectors such as firefighters and police. Its primary aim is to enhance health surveillance by providing timely, high-quality information that guides prevention strategies and informs policymaking. In addition, the project seeks to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with injuries.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effects of injury registry data on policymaking, hospitalization rates or duration, and mortality.

Methods: The systematic review followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, with a protocol registered in PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, CRD42023481528). A total of 5 databases were searched in November 2023, with an update conducted in March 2024, incorporating reference lists from the studies included. Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, resolving disagreements with a third reviewer. Studies were eligible if they reported results related to the implementation and use of injury or trauma registry data for at least one outcome of interest, while those based on other sources were excluded. Synthesis of findings was presented in tables, and the observed results were reported as number or percentage differences.

Results: Out of 9100 studies retrieved, 3951 were excluded due to duplication, leaving 5149 for selection, with 15 full texts reviewed. Only 5 studies met the inclusion criteria, highlighting a notable scarcity of research on the effects or results of registry data on injury outcomes. It is important to note that the studies included reflect correlations rather than causalities, and there are currently no publications on impact. The findings suggest that injury and trauma registries have the potential to inform policymaking, which can lead to enhanced health outcomes. One study noted a 3-day reduction in intensive care unit stay (from 16 to 13 days; P<.05) and a 4% reduction in expected hospital mortality (from 17.5% to 21.5%) for patients with an Injury Severity Score ≥16, while another showed a 42% annual decrease in traffic injury hospital admissions (from 45 to 16). Significant methodological heterogeneity and the small number of studies limited the feasibility of a meta-analysis.

Conclusions: Establishing an injury registry in Brazil presents a significant opportunity to enhance health outcomes through informed policymaking. While it is crucial to set appropriate expectations regarding its effects on morbidity and mortality, particularly concerning the causality and transportability of the findings to the Brazilian context, its role in facilitating preventive measures and improving surveillance capabilities remains valuable.

Abstract Image

伤害登记数据对决策、住院和死亡率的影响:系统回顾。
背景:巴西项目于2021年启动,旨在建立一个全国性的伤害登记处,系统地收集全国各地事件和个人的详细信息,无论伤害严重程度如何。该登记处整合了来自院前和医院护理的信息、缺乏互操作性的各种卫生系统以及来自消防员和警察等部门的数据。其主要目的是通过提供及时、高质量的信息来加强卫生监测,这些信息可指导预防战略并为决策提供信息。此外,该项目力求降低与伤害有关的发病率和死亡率。目的:本研究旨在探讨伤害登记数据对政策制定、住院率或住院时间以及死亡率的影响。方法:系统评价遵循PRISMA(首选报告项目为系统评价和荟萃分析)指南,方案在PROSPERO(国际前瞻性系统评价注册,CRD42023481528)注册。2023年11月共检索了5个数据库,并于2024年3月进行了更新,纳入了所纳入研究的参考文献列表。两位审稿人独立筛选记录,提取数据,并使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估方法学质量,解决与第三位审稿人的分歧。如果研究报告的结果与损伤或创伤登记数据的实施和使用有关,则至少有一个感兴趣的结果,而基于其他来源的研究则被排除在外。综合结果以表格形式呈现,观察到的结果以数量或百分比差异报告。结果:9100篇文献中,3951篇因重复被排除,5149篇可供选择,共审查了15篇全文。只有5项研究符合纳入标准,这突出了对登记数据对损伤结果的影响或结果的研究的显着缺乏。值得注意的是,纳入的研究反映的是相关性,而不是因果关系,目前还没有关于影响的出版物。研究结果表明,伤害和创伤登记有可能为决策提供信息,从而提高健康结果。一项研究指出,重症监护病房的住院时间减少了3天(从16天减少到13天)。结论:在巴西建立伤害登记处为通过知情决策提高健康结果提供了重要机会。虽然必须对其对发病率和死亡率的影响,特别是对调查结果的因果关系和在巴西情况下的可转移性作出适当的预期,但其在促进预防措施和改进监测能力方面的作用仍然是宝贵的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
136
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Public Health & Surveillance (JPHS) is a renowned scholarly journal indexed on PubMed. It follows a rigorous peer-review process and covers a wide range of disciplines. The journal distinguishes itself by its unique focus on the intersection of technology and innovation in the field of public health. JPHS delves into diverse topics such as public health informatics, surveillance systems, rapid reports, participatory epidemiology, infodemiology, infoveillance, digital disease detection, digital epidemiology, electronic public health interventions, mass media and social media campaigns, health communication, and emerging population health analysis systems and tools.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信