Practically Significant Method Comparison Protocols for Machine Learning in Small Molecule Drug Discovery

IF 5.3 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Jeremy R. Ash, , , Cas Wognum*, , , Raquel Rodríguez-Pérez, , , Matteo Aldeghi, , , Alan C. Cheng, , , Djork-Arné Clevert, , , Ola Engkvist, , , Cheng Fang, , , Daniel J. Price, , , Jacqueline M. Hughes-Oliver, , and , W. Patrick Walters, 
{"title":"Practically Significant Method Comparison Protocols for Machine Learning in Small Molecule Drug Discovery","authors":"Jeremy R. Ash,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Cas Wognum*,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Raquel Rodríguez-Pérez,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Matteo Aldeghi,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Alan C. Cheng,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Djork-Arné Clevert,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Ola Engkvist,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Cheng Fang,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Daniel J. Price,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Jacqueline M. Hughes-Oliver,&nbsp;, and ,&nbsp;W. Patrick Walters,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jcim.5c01609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Machine Learning (ML) methods that relate molecular structure to properties are frequently proposed as in silico surrogates for expensive or time-consuming experiments. In small molecule drug discovery, such methods inform high-stakes decisions like compound synthesis and in vivo studies. This application lies at the intersection of multiple scientific disciplines. When comparing new ML methods to baseline or state-of-the-art approaches, statistically rigorous method comparison protocols and domain-appropriate performance metrics are essential to ensure replicability and ultimately the adoption of ML in small molecule drug discovery. This paper proposes a set of guidelines to incentivize rigorous and domain-appropriate techniques for method comparison tailored to small molecule property modeling. These guidelines, accompanied by annotated examples using open-source software tools, lay a foundation for robust ML benchmarking and thus the development of more impactful methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":44,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling ","volume":"65 18","pages":"9398–9411"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling ","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.5c01609","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Machine Learning (ML) methods that relate molecular structure to properties are frequently proposed as in silico surrogates for expensive or time-consuming experiments. In small molecule drug discovery, such methods inform high-stakes decisions like compound synthesis and in vivo studies. This application lies at the intersection of multiple scientific disciplines. When comparing new ML methods to baseline or state-of-the-art approaches, statistically rigorous method comparison protocols and domain-appropriate performance metrics are essential to ensure replicability and ultimately the adoption of ML in small molecule drug discovery. This paper proposes a set of guidelines to incentivize rigorous and domain-appropriate techniques for method comparison tailored to small molecule property modeling. These guidelines, accompanied by annotated examples using open-source software tools, lay a foundation for robust ML benchmarking and thus the development of more impactful methods.

小分子药物发现中机器学习的实际意义方法比较协议。
将分子结构与性质联系起来的机器学习(ML)方法经常被提议作为昂贵或耗时实验的硅替代品。在小分子药物发现中,这些方法为诸如化合物合成和体内研究等高风险决策提供了信息。这种应用是多种科学学科的交叉。当将新的ML方法与基线或最先进的方法进行比较时,统计学上严格的方法比较协议和适合领域的性能指标对于确保ML在小分子药物发现中的可复制性和最终采用至关重要。本文提出了一套指导方针,以激励严格和领域适当的技术,为小分子性质建模量身定制的方法比较。这些指导方针,伴随着使用开源软件工具的注释示例,为强大的ML基准测试奠定了基础,从而开发出更有影响力的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
529
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling publishes papers reporting new methodology and/or important applications in the fields of chemical informatics and molecular modeling. Specific topics include the representation and computer-based searching of chemical databases, molecular modeling, computer-aided molecular design of new materials, catalysts, or ligands, development of new computational methods or efficient algorithms for chemical software, and biopharmaceutical chemistry including analyses of biological activity and other issues related to drug discovery. Astute chemists, computer scientists, and information specialists look to this monthly’s insightful research studies, programming innovations, and software reviews to keep current with advances in this integral, multidisciplinary field. As a subscriber you’ll stay abreast of database search systems, use of graph theory in chemical problems, substructure search systems, pattern recognition and clustering, analysis of chemical and physical data, molecular modeling, graphics and natural language interfaces, bibliometric and citation analysis, and synthesis design and reactions databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信