Eliminating the high-risk CTV1 margin in DAHANCA oropharyngeal radiotherapy: Dosimetric impact on dysphagia and organ-at-risk doses.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Christian Rønn Hansen, Anders S Bertelsen, Irene Hazell, Sarah W Stougaard, Jørgen Johansen, Jens Overgaard, Jesper Grau Eriksen, Ruta Zukauskaite
{"title":"Eliminating the high-risk CTV1 margin in DAHANCA oropharyngeal radiotherapy: Dosimetric impact on dysphagia and organ-at-risk doses.","authors":"Christian Rønn Hansen, Anders S Bertelsen, Irene Hazell, Sarah W Stougaard, Jørgen Johansen, Jens Overgaard, Jesper Grau Eriksen, Ruta Zukauskaite","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.44049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Radiotherapy for head and neck cancer must balance tumour control with late toxicities such as dysphagia and xerostomia. Recent retrospective studies suggest that the margin from the gross tumour volume (GTV) to the high-dose clinical target volume (CTV1) may not be critical for local control, while larger irradiated volumes increase the risk of toxicity. The study quantifies potential reductions in dose to organs at risk (OARs) and predicted dysphagia risk when the standard 5 mm GTV-to-CTV1 margin is eliminated in oropharyngeal cancer. Patient/material and methods: Retrospectively 30 oropharyngeal cancer patients treated consecutively during 2023 according to the DAHANCA guidelines (5 mm GTV-to-CTV1 margin) were selected. For each patient, a standard plan and a modified experimental plan (CTV1 = GTV, and CTV2 reduced by 5 mm accordingly) were generated using Pinnacle3 Auto-Planning. All plans met the DAHANCA target coverage and OAR dose constraints. Dose-volume data for relevant OARs were extracted and compared in MATLAB. Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model for dysphagia was applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Margin elimination reduced high-dose CTV volumes by 70%, yielding significant dose reductions to multiple OARs. Mean doses to the upper/middle pharyngeal constrictors decreased by around 4-5 Gy (p < 0.001) and to the contralateral submandibular gland by ~5 Gy (p < 0.001). These dosimetric gains correspond to an estimated median ΔNTCP of 6.0% of late grade ≥ 2 dysphagia. Target coverage and conformity were maintained in all plans.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Omitting the high-risk CTV margin can substantially reduce the dose to dysphagia--associated OAR without compromising target coverage. This approach shows promise for improving patient-reported swallowing outcomes and warrants clinical evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"1205-1211"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439217/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.44049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Radiotherapy for head and neck cancer must balance tumour control with late toxicities such as dysphagia and xerostomia. Recent retrospective studies suggest that the margin from the gross tumour volume (GTV) to the high-dose clinical target volume (CTV1) may not be critical for local control, while larger irradiated volumes increase the risk of toxicity. The study quantifies potential reductions in dose to organs at risk (OARs) and predicted dysphagia risk when the standard 5 mm GTV-to-CTV1 margin is eliminated in oropharyngeal cancer. Patient/material and methods: Retrospectively 30 oropharyngeal cancer patients treated consecutively during 2023 according to the DAHANCA guidelines (5 mm GTV-to-CTV1 margin) were selected. For each patient, a standard plan and a modified experimental plan (CTV1 = GTV, and CTV2 reduced by 5 mm accordingly) were generated using Pinnacle3 Auto-Planning. All plans met the DAHANCA target coverage and OAR dose constraints. Dose-volume data for relevant OARs were extracted and compared in MATLAB. Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model for dysphagia was applied.

Results: Margin elimination reduced high-dose CTV volumes by 70%, yielding significant dose reductions to multiple OARs. Mean doses to the upper/middle pharyngeal constrictors decreased by around 4-5 Gy (p < 0.001) and to the contralateral submandibular gland by ~5 Gy (p < 0.001). These dosimetric gains correspond to an estimated median ΔNTCP of 6.0% of late grade ≥ 2 dysphagia. Target coverage and conformity were maintained in all plans.

Interpretation: Omitting the high-risk CTV margin can substantially reduce the dose to dysphagia--associated OAR without compromising target coverage. This approach shows promise for improving patient-reported swallowing outcomes and warrants clinical evaluation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

消除DAHANCA口咽放疗的高危CTV1边缘:对吞咽困难和器官危险剂量的剂量学影响
背景和目的:头颈癌放疗必须平衡肿瘤控制和晚期毒性,如吞咽困难和口干。最近的回顾性研究表明,从总肿瘤体积(GTV)到高剂量临床靶体积(CTV1)的边界可能不是局部控制的关键,而更大的照射体积增加了毒性的风险。该研究量化了口咽癌患者消除标准的5 mm gtv - ctv1边界时,危及器官(OARs)剂量的潜在减少,并预测了吞咽困难的风险。患者/材料和方法:回顾性选择2023年根据DAHANCA指南(5 mm gtv - ctv1切缘)连续治疗的30例口咽癌患者。使用Pinnacle3 Auto-Planning软件生成每位患者的标准方案和修改后的实验方案(CTV1 = GTV, CTV2相应缩小5mm)。所有计划均满足DAHANCA目标覆盖范围和OAR剂量限制。在MATLAB中提取相关桨叶的剂量-体积数据并进行比较。吞咽困难患者采用正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)模型。结果:边缘消除使高剂量CTV体积减少了70%,使多个OARs的剂量显著减少。上/中咽收缩肌的平均剂量减少约4-5 Gy (p < 0.001),对侧颌下腺的平均剂量减少约5 Gy (p < 0.001)。这些剂量学增益对应于晚期≥2级吞咽困难的估计中位数ΔNTCP为6.0%。所有计划的目标覆盖率和一致性都得到了保证。解释:省略高危CTV切缘可以大大减少与吞咽困难相关的OAR的剂量,而不会影响目标覆盖。这种方法有望改善患者报告的吞咽结果,值得临床评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信