[Why are we revising our primary knee arthroplasties? An evaluation of the causes for revision of primary knee arthroplasties over a five-year period (2018-2022)].

Acta ortopedica mexicana Pub Date : 2025-07-01
J Sánchez-Del Saz, B Alcobía-Díaz, M B Rizo-de Álvaro, R García-Crespo
{"title":"[Why are we revising our primary knee arthroplasties? An evaluation of the causes for revision of primary knee arthroplasties over a five-year period (2018-2022)].","authors":"J Sánchez-Del Saz, B Alcobía-Díaz, M B Rizo-de Álvaro, R García-Crespo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>the progressive increase in the volume of primary knee arthroplasty surgery is leading in parallel to an increase in revision surgeries, and this trend is expected to continue in the coming decades.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>a retrospective observational study with 203 interventions in 201 patients with knee arthroplasty revision surgery at our center between 2018-2022, including the variables age, sex, body mass index, primary implant, time until revision surgery, mechanical alignment of the primary implant, cause of revision, revision implant, and need for secondary revision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>the average age of the patients was 73.8 years (70% were women). The average time from primary surgery to revision was 58.7 months. The main cause of revision was aseptic loosening (37.9%). Eighty-three (34.9%) patients required an early revision (on average, in 12.7 months), with instability being the main cause in this subgroup (36.1%). Twenty-four (11.8%) patients required an additional revision, also mainly due to instability (33.3%), with a younger average age (66.9 years). The most common surgical approach was complete replacement (70%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>knee arthroplasty revision surgery in our environment is determined by different patterns depending on the chronology. Joint stability is the main determinant of revision in the first two years, while aseptic loosening seems to predominate in the long term, with infection in the background. Revision of primary knee arthroplasty remains to be a surgical challenge, as 11.8% of patients required an additional revision surgery, especially in younger patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":101296,"journal":{"name":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","volume":"39 4","pages":"204-211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: the progressive increase in the volume of primary knee arthroplasty surgery is leading in parallel to an increase in revision surgeries, and this trend is expected to continue in the coming decades.

Material and methods: a retrospective observational study with 203 interventions in 201 patients with knee arthroplasty revision surgery at our center between 2018-2022, including the variables age, sex, body mass index, primary implant, time until revision surgery, mechanical alignment of the primary implant, cause of revision, revision implant, and need for secondary revision.

Results: the average age of the patients was 73.8 years (70% were women). The average time from primary surgery to revision was 58.7 months. The main cause of revision was aseptic loosening (37.9%). Eighty-three (34.9%) patients required an early revision (on average, in 12.7 months), with instability being the main cause in this subgroup (36.1%). Twenty-four (11.8%) patients required an additional revision, also mainly due to instability (33.3%), with a younger average age (66.9 years). The most common surgical approach was complete replacement (70%).

Conclusions: knee arthroplasty revision surgery in our environment is determined by different patterns depending on the chronology. Joint stability is the main determinant of revision in the first two years, while aseptic loosening seems to predominate in the long term, with infection in the background. Revision of primary knee arthroplasty remains to be a surgical challenge, as 11.8% of patients required an additional revision surgery, especially in younger patients.

我们为什么要修改膝关节置换术?评估五年期间(2018-2022)原发性膝关节置换术翻修的原因[j]。
引言:原发性膝关节置换术的数量逐渐增加,导致翻修手术的增加,预计这一趋势将在未来几十年持续下去。材料和方法:对2018-2022年间我院201例膝关节置换术翻修手术患者进行回顾性观察研究,采用203项干预措施,包括年龄、性别、体重指数、初次种植体、翻修手术前时间、初次种植体机械对准、翻修原因、翻修种植体和需要二次翻修等变量。结果:患者平均年龄73.8岁,女性占70%。从初次手术到翻修的平均时间为58.7个月。翻修的主要原因是无菌性松动(37.9%)。83例(34.9%)患者需要早期翻修(平均为12.7个月),不稳定是该亚组的主要原因(36.1%)。24例(11.8%)患者需要额外翻修,主要是由于不稳定(33.3%),平均年龄较小(66.9岁)。最常见的手术方法是完全替代(70%)。结论:在我们的环境中,膝关节置换术翻修手术是由不同的模式决定的,这取决于时间顺序。关节稳定性是前两年翻修的主要决定因素,而无菌性松动似乎在长期内占主导地位,感染是背景。原发性膝关节置换术的翻修仍然是一个手术挑战,因为11.8%的患者需要额外的翻修手术,特别是在年轻患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信