Evaluation of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Results in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome After COVID-19.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yu K Naghiyev, G Sh Shakhmarova, F N Ibrahimov
{"title":"Evaluation of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Results in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome After COVID-19.","authors":"Yu K Naghiyev, G Sh Shakhmarova, F N Ibrahimov","doi":"10.18087/cardio.2025.8.n2875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aim        To compare the results of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) in patients who recently recovered from COVID-19 with those not previously infected with SARS-CoV-2; to establish prognostic criteria for PCI complications, including stent thrombosis and restenosis (ST and SR) and progression of ischemic heart disease, and to determine ways to prevent them.Material and methods         In 2021, middle-aged patients admitted to the Baku Central Clinical Hospital with a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome who underwent urgent myocardial revascularization using percutaneous balloon angioplasty of the occluded coronary artery (CA) with implantation of a second-generation intracoronary drug-eluting stent were divided into two observation groups: the main group of 123 patients who had COVID-19 in the previous 6 months, and the control group of 112 patients who were not previously infected with SARS-CoV-2. The immediate results of PCI were assessed according to the TIMI scale; complications were assessed both clinically, by the incidence of severe complications (major adverse cardiovascular events, MACE), and angiographically, by the incidence of early and late ST and SR, and de novo stenosis that developed during the two-year observation period. The results of PCI were compared with the concentration of inflammatory biomarkers (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, hs-CRP) and thrombosis (D-dimer) in order to assess their possible prognostic potential for negative outcomes of PCI after COVID-19.Results    After COVID-19, the incidence of ST and SR, repeat myocardial revascularization, MACE, and de novo stenosis over the two-year follow-up period was higher than in patients with NSTE-ACS previously not infected with SARS-CoV-2. The D-dimer and hs-CRP levels showed a prognostic potential for negative outcomes of coronary stenting after COVID-19. Thus, early STs were associated with hypercoagulation (D-dimer ≥1500 ng/ml) in both groups, while in patients who had recently recovered from COVID-19, they were associated with the absence of a decrease in D-dimer by &gt;50% in the 1st month of standard antithrombotic therapy, the \"slow reflow\" phenomenon, and \"mild\" hypercoagulation in combination with low-grade systemic inflammation (CRP 5-9 mg/l). Early SR were associated with mid-grade systemic inflammation (CRP ≥10 mg/l) or a two-fold \"jump\" in CRP concentration in the first two weeks after PCI while late SRs were associated with long-term (more than 6 months) low-grade systemic inflammation with a median hs-CRP level of 6.6 mg/l. In patients with comorbid obesity and carbohydrate metabolism disorders in the presence of low-grade systemic inflammation after COVID-19, the 6-month risk of developing complications after PCI increased by 66.4% compared to those who were not infected with SARS-CoV-2 (73.4 and 44.1%, respectively; odds ratio (OR) 1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.45-1.90; p=0.041). In this category of patients, standard pharmacotherapy was not effective enough to prevent the development of such severe cardiovascular complications as myocardial infarction, stroke, and the need for repeated revascularization, the risk of which was 2.1, 2.3 and 2.0 times, respectively, higher in the main group than in the control group.Conclusion            COVID-19 can worsen the results of PCI in patients with NSTE-ACS. The identified prognostic predictors of ST and SR allow identification of a category of individuals at high risk of complications after PCI and warrant revising the therapeutic strategy for their prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":54750,"journal":{"name":"Kardiologiya","volume":"65 8","pages":"53-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kardiologiya","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2025.8.n2875","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim        To compare the results of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) in patients who recently recovered from COVID-19 with those not previously infected with SARS-CoV-2; to establish prognostic criteria for PCI complications, including stent thrombosis and restenosis (ST and SR) and progression of ischemic heart disease, and to determine ways to prevent them.Material and methods         In 2021, middle-aged patients admitted to the Baku Central Clinical Hospital with a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome who underwent urgent myocardial revascularization using percutaneous balloon angioplasty of the occluded coronary artery (CA) with implantation of a second-generation intracoronary drug-eluting stent were divided into two observation groups: the main group of 123 patients who had COVID-19 in the previous 6 months, and the control group of 112 patients who were not previously infected with SARS-CoV-2. The immediate results of PCI were assessed according to the TIMI scale; complications were assessed both clinically, by the incidence of severe complications (major adverse cardiovascular events, MACE), and angiographically, by the incidence of early and late ST and SR, and de novo stenosis that developed during the two-year observation period. The results of PCI were compared with the concentration of inflammatory biomarkers (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, hs-CRP) and thrombosis (D-dimer) in order to assess their possible prognostic potential for negative outcomes of PCI after COVID-19.Results    After COVID-19, the incidence of ST and SR, repeat myocardial revascularization, MACE, and de novo stenosis over the two-year follow-up period was higher than in patients with NSTE-ACS previously not infected with SARS-CoV-2. The D-dimer and hs-CRP levels showed a prognostic potential for negative outcomes of coronary stenting after COVID-19. Thus, early STs were associated with hypercoagulation (D-dimer ≥1500 ng/ml) in both groups, while in patients who had recently recovered from COVID-19, they were associated with the absence of a decrease in D-dimer by >50% in the 1st month of standard antithrombotic therapy, the "slow reflow" phenomenon, and "mild" hypercoagulation in combination with low-grade systemic inflammation (CRP 5-9 mg/l). Early SR were associated with mid-grade systemic inflammation (CRP ≥10 mg/l) or a two-fold "jump" in CRP concentration in the first two weeks after PCI while late SRs were associated with long-term (more than 6 months) low-grade systemic inflammation with a median hs-CRP level of 6.6 mg/l. In patients with comorbid obesity and carbohydrate metabolism disorders in the presence of low-grade systemic inflammation after COVID-19, the 6-month risk of developing complications after PCI increased by 66.4% compared to those who were not infected with SARS-CoV-2 (73.4 and 44.1%, respectively; odds ratio (OR) 1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.45-1.90; p=0.041). In this category of patients, standard pharmacotherapy was not effective enough to prevent the development of such severe cardiovascular complications as myocardial infarction, stroke, and the need for repeated revascularization, the risk of which was 2.1, 2.3 and 2.0 times, respectively, higher in the main group than in the control group.Conclusion            COVID-19 can worsen the results of PCI in patients with NSTE-ACS. The identified prognostic predictors of ST and SR allow identification of a category of individuals at high risk of complications after PCI and warrant revising the therapeutic strategy for their prevention.

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗新冠肺炎后急性冠状动脉综合征疗效评价
目的比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)治疗新冠肺炎(COVID-19)患者与未感染SARS-CoV-2患者非st段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)的效果;建立PCI并发症的预后标准,包括支架血栓形成和再狭窄(ST和SR)以及缺血性心脏病的进展,并确定预防方法。材料与方法2021年,巴库中心临床医院确诊为急性冠状动脉综合征的中年患者行急诊心肌血运重建术,经皮冠状动脉闭塞球囊成形术(CA)并植入第二代冠状动脉内药物洗脱支架,分为两组:主要组123例既往6个月感染COVID-19患者,对照组112例既往未感染SARS-CoV-2患者。根据TIMI量表评估PCI的即时效果;通过临床评估严重并发症(主要不良心血管事件,MACE)的发生率,通过血管造影评估早期和晚期ST和SR的发生率,以及两年观察期间发生的新生狭窄。将PCI结果与炎症生物标志物(高敏c反应蛋白,hs-CRP)和血栓形成(d -二聚体)浓度进行比较,以评估其对COVID-19后PCI阴性结果的可能预后潜力。结果与未感染SARS-CoV-2的NSTE-ACS患者相比,冠状病毒感染后2年随访期间ST和SR、重复心肌血运重建术、MACE和新生狭窄的发生率均较高。d -二聚体和hs-CRP水平显示了COVID-19后冠状动脉支架置入阴性结果的预后潜力。因此,两组患者的早期STs均与高凝相关(d -二聚体≥1500ng /ml),而在新近从COVID-19康复的患者中,它们与标准抗栓治疗第1个月d -二聚体未下降50%、“慢回流”现象和“轻度”高凝合并低级别全身炎症(CRP 5- 9mg /l)相关。早期SR与中度全身性炎症(CRP≥10 mg/l)或PCI术后前两周CRP浓度两倍“跳跃”相关,而晚期SR与长期(超过6个月)低级别全身性炎症相关,中位hs-CRP水平为6.6 mg/l。与未感染SARS-CoV-2的患者相比,合并肥胖和碳水化合物代谢障碍并存在低度全身性炎症的患者,PCI术后6个月发生并发症的风险增加66.4%(分别为73.4和44.1%),优势比(OR) 1.66;95%置信区间(CI) 1.45-1.90;p = 0.041)。在这类患者中,标准药物治疗不足以有效预防心肌梗死、脑卒中等严重心血管并发症的发生和反复血运重建的需要,主要组的风险分别为2.1倍、2.3倍和2.0倍,高于对照组。结论COVID-19可使NSTE-ACS患者PCI结果恶化。已确定的ST和SR的预后预测因素允许识别PCI术后并发症高风险的个体类别,并保证修改治疗策略以预防其发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kardiologiya
Kardiologiya 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: “Kardiologiya” (Cardiology) is a monthly scientific, peer-reviewed journal committed to both basic cardiovascular medicine and practical aspects of cardiology. As the leader in its field, “Kardiologiya” provides original coverage of recent progress in cardiovascular medicine. We publish state-of-the-art articles integrating clinical and research activities in the fields of basic cardiovascular science and clinical cardiology, with a focus on emerging issues in cardiovascular disease. Our target audience spans a diversity of health care professionals and medical researchers working in cardiovascular medicine and related fields. The principal language of the Journal is Russian, an additional language – English (title, authors’ information, abstract, keywords). “Kardiologiya” is a peer-reviewed scientific journal. All articles are reviewed by scientists, who gained high international prestige in cardiovascular science and clinical cardiology. The Journal is currently cited and indexed in major Abstracting & Indexing databases: Web of Science, Medline and Scopus. The Journal''s primary objectives Contribute to raising the professional level of medical researchers, physicians and academic teachers. Present the results of current research and clinical observations, explore the effectiveness of drug and non-drug treatments of heart disease, inform about new diagnostic techniques; discuss current trends and new advancements in clinical cardiology, contribute to continuing medical education, inform readers about results of Russian and international scientific forums; Further improve the general quality of reviewing and editing of manuscripts submitted for publication; Provide the widest possible dissemination of the published articles, among the global scientific community; Extend distribution and indexing of scientific publications in major Abstracting & Indexing databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信