Impact of Urate-Lowering Therapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on the Long- Term Prognosis of Patients with Hyperuricemia.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Bei Zhao, Zhong Zhang, Chaosheng Du, Ning Li, Li Liu, Xiaobing Zhao, Shuai Mao, Huihui Xia, Changhui Duo, Shouli Wang
{"title":"Impact of Urate-Lowering Therapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on the Long- Term Prognosis of Patients with Hyperuricemia.","authors":"Bei Zhao, Zhong Zhang, Chaosheng Du, Ning Li, Li Liu, Xiaobing Zhao, Shuai Mao, Huihui Xia, Changhui Duo, Shouli Wang","doi":"10.18087/cardio.2025.8.n2942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Hyperuricemia (HUA) frequently coexists with coronary artery disease (CAD) and is linked to adverse cardiovascular outcomes. The long-term impact of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) on clinical outcomes, including all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), in CAD patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been determined. That was the aim of this study.Material and methods In this retrospective cohort study, we included 649 patients with HUA who underwent PCI between July 2014 and May 2020. Patients who received standardized ULT for at least one month post-PCI were assigned to the treatment group, while those untreated or nonadherent were assigned to the non-treatment group. Outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, multivariate Cox regression models, and propensity score matching. Preoperative and postoperative cardiac function, including left ventricular ejection fraction and right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP), was evaluated.Results Over a median follow-up of 6.32 years, the incidence of all-cause mortality was 30.41 per 1,000 personyears, and MACEs occurred at a rate of 45.90 per 1,000 person-years. ULT was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.915; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.645-0.998) and MACEs (HR: 0.887; 95 % CI: 0.661-0.990). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses confirmed these benefits, regardless of baseline uric acid (UA) concentrations or early UA normalization.Notably, ULT was most effective in reducing cardiovascular mortality and myocardial infarction, with no significant effect on stroke or heart failure. Cardiac function in the treatment group improved post- PCI, with significant improvements in diastolic function and RVSP. In a sensitivity analysis using propensity score matching, the protective effect of ULT on both all-cause mortality and MACEs remained robust, reinforcing the conclusions of the primary analyses.Conclusion Early initiation of ULT in patients with HUA after PCI is associated with improved long-term survival, reduced MACEs, and better cardiac function. These findings underscore the clinical value of ULT.</p>","PeriodicalId":54750,"journal":{"name":"Kardiologiya","volume":"65 8","pages":"71-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kardiologiya","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2025.8.n2942","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Hyperuricemia (HUA) frequently coexists with coronary artery disease (CAD) and is linked to adverse cardiovascular outcomes. The long-term impact of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) on clinical outcomes, including all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), in CAD patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been determined. That was the aim of this study.Material and methods In this retrospective cohort study, we included 649 patients with HUA who underwent PCI between July 2014 and May 2020. Patients who received standardized ULT for at least one month post-PCI were assigned to the treatment group, while those untreated or nonadherent were assigned to the non-treatment group. Outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, multivariate Cox regression models, and propensity score matching. Preoperative and postoperative cardiac function, including left ventricular ejection fraction and right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP), was evaluated.Results Over a median follow-up of 6.32 years, the incidence of all-cause mortality was 30.41 per 1,000 personyears, and MACEs occurred at a rate of 45.90 per 1,000 person-years. ULT was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.915; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.645-0.998) and MACEs (HR: 0.887; 95 % CI: 0.661-0.990). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses confirmed these benefits, regardless of baseline uric acid (UA) concentrations or early UA normalization.Notably, ULT was most effective in reducing cardiovascular mortality and myocardial infarction, with no significant effect on stroke or heart failure. Cardiac function in the treatment group improved post- PCI, with significant improvements in diastolic function and RVSP. In a sensitivity analysis using propensity score matching, the protective effect of ULT on both all-cause mortality and MACEs remained robust, reinforcing the conclusions of the primary analyses.Conclusion Early initiation of ULT in patients with HUA after PCI is associated with improved long-term survival, reduced MACEs, and better cardiac function. These findings underscore the clinical value of ULT.

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后降尿酸治疗对高尿酸血症患者长期预后的影响。
背景:高尿酸血症(HUA)经常与冠状动脉疾病(CAD)共存,并与不良心血管结局相关。降尿酸治疗(ULT)对CAD患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的临床结果,包括全因死亡率和主要不良心血管事件(mace)的长期影响尚未确定。这就是这项研究的目的。在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们纳入了2014年7月至2020年5月期间接受PCI治疗的649例HUA患者。pci后接受标准化ULT治疗至少一个月的患者被分配到治疗组,而未接受治疗或未坚持治疗的患者被分配到非治疗组。使用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线、多变量Cox回归模型和倾向评分匹配评估结果。评估术前和术后心功能,包括左心室射血分数和右心室收缩压(RVSP)。结果在中位随访6.32年期间,全因死亡率为30.41 / 1000人年,mace发生率为45.90 / 1000人年。ULT与全因死亡率(风险比[HR]: 0.915; 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.645-0.998)和mace(风险比:0.887;95%可信区间[CI]: 0.661-0.990)显著降低相关。亚组分析和敏感性分析证实了这些益处,无论基线尿酸(UA)浓度或早期UA正常化。值得注意的是,ULT在降低心血管死亡率和心肌梗死方面最有效,对中风或心力衰竭没有显著影响。治疗组PCI术后心功能改善,舒张功能和RVSP明显改善。在使用倾向评分匹配的敏感性分析中,ULT对全因死亡率和mace的保护作用仍然强大,加强了主要分析的结论。结论HUA患者PCI术后早期开始ULT可提高长期生存率,降低mace,改善心功能。这些发现强调了ULT的临床价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kardiologiya
Kardiologiya 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: “Kardiologiya” (Cardiology) is a monthly scientific, peer-reviewed journal committed to both basic cardiovascular medicine and practical aspects of cardiology. As the leader in its field, “Kardiologiya” provides original coverage of recent progress in cardiovascular medicine. We publish state-of-the-art articles integrating clinical and research activities in the fields of basic cardiovascular science and clinical cardiology, with a focus on emerging issues in cardiovascular disease. Our target audience spans a diversity of health care professionals and medical researchers working in cardiovascular medicine and related fields. The principal language of the Journal is Russian, an additional language – English (title, authors’ information, abstract, keywords). “Kardiologiya” is a peer-reviewed scientific journal. All articles are reviewed by scientists, who gained high international prestige in cardiovascular science and clinical cardiology. The Journal is currently cited and indexed in major Abstracting & Indexing databases: Web of Science, Medline and Scopus. The Journal''s primary objectives Contribute to raising the professional level of medical researchers, physicians and academic teachers. Present the results of current research and clinical observations, explore the effectiveness of drug and non-drug treatments of heart disease, inform about new diagnostic techniques; discuss current trends and new advancements in clinical cardiology, contribute to continuing medical education, inform readers about results of Russian and international scientific forums; Further improve the general quality of reviewing and editing of manuscripts submitted for publication; Provide the widest possible dissemination of the published articles, among the global scientific community; Extend distribution and indexing of scientific publications in major Abstracting & Indexing databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信