P/CVE-as-counterinsurgency: Police violence and police reform in Kenya's counterterrorism agenda.

IF 2.5 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Security Dialogue Pub Date : 2025-02-14 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1177/09670106241301672
Elizabeth Mesok, Darja Schildknecht
{"title":"P/CVE-as-counterinsurgency: Police violence and police reform in Kenya's counterterrorism agenda.","authors":"Elizabeth Mesok, Darja Schildknecht","doi":"10.1177/09670106241301672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article considers the calls for police reform and the continuation of police brutality to be twinning modes of policing within Kenya's broader counterterrorism and preventing and countering violent extremism (P/CVE) architecture. Rather than seeing ongoing police brutality as a failure of, or at odds with, calls for police reform, we argue that what appears to be a paradox is actually indicative of a dialectic central to civil counterinsurgency - a dialectic comprising what we call 'coercive compliance' and 'abject coercion'. Based on extensive field research in Kenya, this article centers the institution of the police as an integral mode of P/CVE-as-counterinsurgency to analyze various manifestations of police power, including international compliance vis-a-vis police reform, police brutality, and community engagement. We further theorize P/CVE-as-counterinsurgency in conversation with Kenya's colonial history, arguing that police violence is neither new nor unique to today's counterterrorism regime. Rather, we argue that contemporary policing in Kenya contains sediment of racialized counterinsurgency tactics that were critical to colonial rule in the mid-20th century. In conclusion, we offer reflections on other security contexts where the dialectic of coercive compliance and abject coercion might serve as a useful analytic.</p>","PeriodicalId":21670,"journal":{"name":"Security Dialogue","volume":"56 4","pages":"299-315"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12416826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Security Dialogue","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09670106241301672","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article considers the calls for police reform and the continuation of police brutality to be twinning modes of policing within Kenya's broader counterterrorism and preventing and countering violent extremism (P/CVE) architecture. Rather than seeing ongoing police brutality as a failure of, or at odds with, calls for police reform, we argue that what appears to be a paradox is actually indicative of a dialectic central to civil counterinsurgency - a dialectic comprising what we call 'coercive compliance' and 'abject coercion'. Based on extensive field research in Kenya, this article centers the institution of the police as an integral mode of P/CVE-as-counterinsurgency to analyze various manifestations of police power, including international compliance vis-a-vis police reform, police brutality, and community engagement. We further theorize P/CVE-as-counterinsurgency in conversation with Kenya's colonial history, arguing that police violence is neither new nor unique to today's counterterrorism regime. Rather, we argue that contemporary policing in Kenya contains sediment of racialized counterinsurgency tactics that were critical to colonial rule in the mid-20th century. In conclusion, we offer reflections on other security contexts where the dialectic of coercive compliance and abject coercion might serve as a useful analytic.

Abstract Image

P/ cve作为反叛乱:肯尼亚反恐议程中的警察暴力和警察改革。
本文认为,警察改革的呼声和警察暴行的延续,是肯尼亚更广泛的反恐、预防和打击暴力极端主义(P/CVE)架构中的一对警务模式。我们不认为正在进行的警察暴行是警察改革的失败,或者与呼吁的不一致,我们认为,表面上的悖论实际上表明了民事反叛乱的核心辩证法——一种由我们所谓的“强制性服从”和“卑劣的强制”组成的辩证法。基于在肯尼亚广泛的实地研究,本文以警察制度为中心,将其作为P/ cve作为反叛乱的一个整体模式,分析警察权力的各种表现形式,包括与警察改革、警察暴行和社区参与相关的国际合规。在与肯尼亚殖民历史的对话中,我们进一步将P/ cve作为反叛乱的理论,认为警察暴力既不是新的,也不是今天反恐政权所独有的。相反,我们认为肯尼亚的当代警务包含了种族化的反叛乱策略的沉淀,这些策略对20世纪中期的殖民统治至关重要。最后,我们提供了对其他安全背景的反思,在这些背景下,强制性服从和卑鄙的强制的辩证法可以作为有用的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Security Dialogue
Security Dialogue INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Security Dialogue is a fully peer-reviewed and highly ranked international bi-monthly journal that seeks to combine contemporary theoretical analysis with challenges to public policy across a wide ranging field of security studies. Security Dialogue seeks to revisit and recast the concept of security through new approaches and methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信