Eco Friendly and Budget Smart: An Economic and Environmental Evaluation of Alternative PD-1 and PD-L1 Inhibitor Dosing Regimens.

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Leo Karlsson, Joseph Ciccolini, Rob Ter Heine, Maddalena Centanni
{"title":"Eco Friendly and Budget Smart: An Economic and Environmental Evaluation of Alternative PD-1 and PD-L1 Inhibitor Dosing Regimens.","authors":"Leo Karlsson, Joseph Ciccolini, Rob Ter Heine, Maddalena Centanni","doi":"10.1007/s40273-025-01535-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are clinically beneficial but associated with high costs that represent a growing challenge for healthcare budgets and may affect affordability, especially in resource-limited settings. Moreover, the healthcare sector is a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions, and medication-related waste-such as that from vial-based therapies-has been identified as a contributing factor. Alternative dosing strategies could reduce the environmental and financial impact of ICI therapy while maintaining clinical safety and efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Population pharmacokinetic simulations were performed using virtual cohorts representative of the original cancer populations treated with ICIs. The analysis was conducted from a Western European hospital perspective, using Dutch public data to estimate costs (based on volume-dependent pricing) and carbon emissions from drug production, travel, and medical waste.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under the US Food and Drug Administration exposure-matching criteria, optimized dosing regimens reduced drug costs by up to €23,311 (- 28%) and carbon emissions by up to 255 kgCO₂e (- 30%) per patient, depending on the drug and dosing strategy. Using a broader therapeutic window approach, cost savings reached up to €40,135 (- 69%) and carbon reductions up to 501 kgCO₂e (- 63%) per patient. Incorporating vial sharing further increased potential cost savings to €5,721 per patient (- 31%). All estimates reflect European pricing and emissions factors, modeled over an 8-month treatment period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that optimizing dosing strategies can yield meaningful economic and environmental benefits in ICI therapy while maintaining drug exposure within levels defined by US Food and Drug Administration criteria or broader therapeutic windows. A user-friendly application developed in this study allows users to generate virtual populations and evaluate tailored dosing strategies, facilitating practical implementation in diverse healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19807,"journal":{"name":"PharmacoEconomics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmacoEconomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-025-01535-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are clinically beneficial but associated with high costs that represent a growing challenge for healthcare budgets and may affect affordability, especially in resource-limited settings. Moreover, the healthcare sector is a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions, and medication-related waste-such as that from vial-based therapies-has been identified as a contributing factor. Alternative dosing strategies could reduce the environmental and financial impact of ICI therapy while maintaining clinical safety and efficacy.

Methods: Population pharmacokinetic simulations were performed using virtual cohorts representative of the original cancer populations treated with ICIs. The analysis was conducted from a Western European hospital perspective, using Dutch public data to estimate costs (based on volume-dependent pricing) and carbon emissions from drug production, travel, and medical waste.

Results: Under the US Food and Drug Administration exposure-matching criteria, optimized dosing regimens reduced drug costs by up to €23,311 (- 28%) and carbon emissions by up to 255 kgCO₂e (- 30%) per patient, depending on the drug and dosing strategy. Using a broader therapeutic window approach, cost savings reached up to €40,135 (- 69%) and carbon reductions up to 501 kgCO₂e (- 63%) per patient. Incorporating vial sharing further increased potential cost savings to €5,721 per patient (- 31%). All estimates reflect European pricing and emissions factors, modeled over an 8-month treatment period.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that optimizing dosing strategies can yield meaningful economic and environmental benefits in ICI therapy while maintaining drug exposure within levels defined by US Food and Drug Administration criteria or broader therapeutic windows. A user-friendly application developed in this study allows users to generate virtual populations and evaluate tailored dosing strategies, facilitating practical implementation in diverse healthcare settings.

生态友好和预算明智:替代PD-1和PD-L1抑制剂给药方案的经济和环境评估。
背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)在临床上是有益的,但与高成本相关,这对医疗预算构成了越来越大的挑战,并可能影响可负担性,特别是在资源有限的环境中。此外,医疗保健部门是温室气体排放的一个重要来源,与药物有关的废物——例如来自小瓶疗法的废物——已被确定为一个促成因素。替代给药策略可以减少ICI治疗对环境和经济的影响,同时保持临床安全性和有效性。方法:使用虚拟队列进行群体药代动力学模拟,这些队列代表了最初接受ICIs治疗的癌症人群。该分析是从西欧医院的角度进行的,使用荷兰的公共数据来估计成本(基于基于数量的定价)和药物生产、旅行和医疗废物的碳排放。结果:根据美国食品和药物管理局的暴露匹配标准,根据药物和给药策略,优化的给药方案可使每位患者的药物成本降低高达23,311欧元(- 28%),碳排放量降低高达255 kgCO₂e(- 30%)。使用更广泛的治疗窗口方法,每位患者可节省高达40,135欧元(- 69%)的成本,减少高达501 kgCO₂e(- 63%)的碳排放。合并小瓶共享进一步增加了每位患者5,721欧元的潜在成本节约(- 31%)。所有的估计都反映了欧洲的定价和排放因素,并以8个月的处理期为模型。结论:这些发现表明,优化剂量策略可以在ICI治疗中产生有意义的经济和环境效益,同时将药物暴露保持在美国食品和药物管理局标准或更广泛的治疗窗口范围内。本研究中开发的用户友好型应用程序允许用户生成虚拟人群并评估量身定制的剂量策略,从而促进在不同医疗保健环境中的实际实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PharmacoEconomics
PharmacoEconomics 医学-药学
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: PharmacoEconomics is the benchmark journal for peer-reviewed, authoritative and practical articles on the application of pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life assessment to optimum drug therapy and health outcomes. An invaluable source of applied pharmacoeconomic original research and educational material for the healthcare decision maker. PharmacoEconomics is dedicated to the clear communication of complex pharmacoeconomic issues related to patient care and drug utilization. PharmacoEconomics offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信