Reply To: Bayesian Evaluation of Pentaspline Pulsed Field Ablation Compared to High-Power Radiofrequency Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation.

IF 2.6 3区医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2025-09-09 DOI:10.1111/jce.70103

Marco Valerio Mariani, Andrea Matteucci, Nicola Pierucci, Marta Palombi, Paolo Compagnucci, Raffaele Bruti, Pietro Cipollone, Sara Vinciullo, Sara Trivigno, Agostino Piro, Vincenzo Mirco La Fazia, Wael Saade, Cristina Chimenti, Giovanni Battista Forleo, Antonio Dello Russo, Claudio Pandozi, Andrea Natale, Carmine Dario Vizza, Carlo Lavalle

引用次数: 0

查看原文本刊更多论文

回复：在房颤治疗中，与高功率射频消融相比，Pentaspline脉冲场消融的贝叶斯评价。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 医学-心血管系统

CiteScore

5.20

自引率

14.80%

发文量

433

审稿时长

3-6 weeks

期刊介绍： Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.