Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapies in Sarcoma: Proposed Synergy with Combination Treatment.

IF 3.2 Q3 Medicine
Journal of Immunotherapy and Precision Oncology Pub Date : 2025-08-25 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.36401/JIPO-25-10
Aleksandra Watson, Gina D'Amato, Emily Jonczak, Steven Bialick, Jonathan Trent
{"title":"Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapies in Sarcoma: Proposed Synergy with Combination Treatment.","authors":"Aleksandra Watson, Gina D'Amato, Emily Jonczak, Steven Bialick, Jonathan Trent","doi":"10.36401/JIPO-25-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The combination of targeted therapies and immunotherapies for advanced and metastatic sarcomas has been proposed owing to the enhanced effect of antiangiogenic therapies on the tumor microenvironment. We found eight studies published to date assessing the effectiveness of combined multitargeted vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in sarcoma. It is difficult to draw conclusions owing to limited data and primarily single-arm studies, although initial literature appears promising and requires further study. It remains unknown which sarcoma subtypes may derive the most benefit owing to the limited literature. Benefit was seen primarily in angiosarcoma (AS) and alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), as well as in other tumor subtypes, with few patients achieving complete response (CR). The patients who achieved CRs had desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT), AS, and chondrosarcoma (CS). Mixed results were found in patients with leiomyosarcoma (LMS), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), and bone sarcomas, although combination therapy appears to be less effective in these subtypes. Further studies are required to explore optimal treatment agents and dosing strategies to improve both efficacy and tolerability. Although initial results are promising in select patients, phase 3 randomized controlled trials are necessary to determine true treatment effect with combination therapy versus VEGF-inhibitor or ICI alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":16081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Immunotherapy and Precision Oncology","volume":"8 3","pages":"212-221"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12416487/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Immunotherapy and Precision Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36401/JIPO-25-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The combination of targeted therapies and immunotherapies for advanced and metastatic sarcomas has been proposed owing to the enhanced effect of antiangiogenic therapies on the tumor microenvironment. We found eight studies published to date assessing the effectiveness of combined multitargeted vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in sarcoma. It is difficult to draw conclusions owing to limited data and primarily single-arm studies, although initial literature appears promising and requires further study. It remains unknown which sarcoma subtypes may derive the most benefit owing to the limited literature. Benefit was seen primarily in angiosarcoma (AS) and alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), as well as in other tumor subtypes, with few patients achieving complete response (CR). The patients who achieved CRs had desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT), AS, and chondrosarcoma (CS). Mixed results were found in patients with leiomyosarcoma (LMS), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), and bone sarcomas, although combination therapy appears to be less effective in these subtypes. Further studies are required to explore optimal treatment agents and dosing strategies to improve both efficacy and tolerability. Although initial results are promising in select patients, phase 3 randomized controlled trials are necessary to determine true treatment effect with combination therapy versus VEGF-inhibitor or ICI alone.

Abstract Image

肉瘤的免疫治疗和靶向治疗:建议联合治疗的协同作用。
由于抗血管生成治疗对肿瘤微环境的作用增强,晚期和转移性肉瘤的靶向治疗和免疫治疗相结合已被提出。我们发现迄今为止发表的8项研究评估了多靶点血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)-酪氨酸激酶抑制剂联合免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)治疗肉瘤的有效性。由于数据有限且主要是单臂研究,因此很难得出结论,尽管初步文献看起来很有希望,但需要进一步研究。由于文献有限,目前尚不清楚哪种肉瘤亚型可能获得最大的益处。获益主要见于血管肉瘤(AS)和肺泡软组织肉瘤(ASPS),以及其他肿瘤亚型,很少有患者达到完全缓解(CR)。达到cr的患者有结缔组织增生小圆细胞瘤(DSRCT)、AS和软骨肉瘤(CS)。在平滑肌肉瘤(LMS)、胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)和骨肉瘤患者中发现了不同的结果,尽管联合治疗在这些亚型中似乎效果较差。需要进一步的研究来探索最佳的治疗药物和剂量策略,以提高疗效和耐受性。虽然在选定的患者中初步结果很有希望,但需要进行3期随机对照试验来确定联合治疗与vegf抑制剂或ICI单独治疗的真正治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信