Clinical and Healthcare Cost Characteristics of Severe Asthma Patients with Long-Term Control on Omalizumab: A Comparative Analysis with Patients Who Switched to Other Biologics.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Journal of Asthma and Allergy Pub Date : 2025-09-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JAA.S523832
Hironobu Sunadome, Hisako Matsumoto, Tadao Nagasaki, Yusuke Hayashi, Satoru Terada, Kenta Nishi, Natsuko Nomura, Mariko Kogo, Chie Morimoto, Tsuyoshi Oguma, Susumu Sato, Toyohiro Hirai
{"title":"Clinical and Healthcare Cost Characteristics of Severe Asthma Patients with Long-Term Control on Omalizumab: A Comparative Analysis with Patients Who Switched to Other Biologics.","authors":"Hironobu Sunadome, Hisako Matsumoto, Tadao Nagasaki, Yusuke Hayashi, Satoru Terada, Kenta Nishi, Natsuko Nomura, Mariko Kogo, Chie Morimoto, Tsuyoshi Oguma, Susumu Sato, Toyohiro Hirai","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S523832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Biologics are crucial for severe asthma treatment, but their high costs pose challenges. Omalizumab (OML) is dosed on the basis of patient-specific factors. The purpose of this study is to clarify the clinical characteristics of severe asthmatics who maintain long-term control on omalizumab including healthcare cost considerations.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted. Patients receiving OML at three institutions were enrolled. Patients continuing OML (C-OML) were compared with those switching to other biologics (S-OML) in terms of clinical background, cost-effectiveness, and type-2 inflammation levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven patients were enrolled. The C-OML group achieved exacerbation control comparable to that of the S-OML group, with a median OML dose of 300 mg/month, resulting in significantly lower personal payments (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Compared with the S-OML group, the C-OML group had a greater prevalence of overweight (<i>p</i> = 0.04), a lower prevalence of eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (<i>p</i> < 0.01), and a trend toward a higher prevalence of allergic rhinitis (<i>p</i> = 0.06). Effective asthma control with OML was associated with nonsevere type-2 inflammation (eosinophils < 300/μL and FeNO < 50 ppb).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with nonsevere type-2 inflammation and a high BMI can achieve effective asthma control with OML, reducing treatment costs. Identifying this phenotype can improve the cost-effectiveness of biologic therapies for patients with severe asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"18 ","pages":"1229-1237"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12415621/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S523832","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Biologics are crucial for severe asthma treatment, but their high costs pose challenges. Omalizumab (OML) is dosed on the basis of patient-specific factors. The purpose of this study is to clarify the clinical characteristics of severe asthmatics who maintain long-term control on omalizumab including healthcare cost considerations.

Patients and methods: A retrospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted. Patients receiving OML at three institutions were enrolled. Patients continuing OML (C-OML) were compared with those switching to other biologics (S-OML) in terms of clinical background, cost-effectiveness, and type-2 inflammation levels.

Results: Forty-seven patients were enrolled. The C-OML group achieved exacerbation control comparable to that of the S-OML group, with a median OML dose of 300 mg/month, resulting in significantly lower personal payments (p < 0.01). Compared with the S-OML group, the C-OML group had a greater prevalence of overweight (p = 0.04), a lower prevalence of eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (p < 0.01), and a trend toward a higher prevalence of allergic rhinitis (p = 0.06). Effective asthma control with OML was associated with nonsevere type-2 inflammation (eosinophils < 300/μL and FeNO < 50 ppb).

Conclusion: Patients with nonsevere type-2 inflammation and a high BMI can achieve effective asthma control with OML, reducing treatment costs. Identifying this phenotype can improve the cost-effectiveness of biologic therapies for patients with severe asthma.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

奥玛单抗长期控制的重症哮喘患者的临床和医疗成本特征:与切换到其他生物制剂的患者的比较分析
背景与目的:生物制剂对严重哮喘的治疗至关重要,但其高昂的成本带来了挑战。Omalizumab (OML)的剂量基于患者特异性因素。本研究的目的是阐明长期服用欧玛单抗的重症哮喘患者的临床特征,包括医疗费用考虑。患者和方法:回顾性、多中心队列研究。在三家机构接受OML的患者被纳入研究。在临床背景、成本效益和2型炎症水平方面,将继续使用OML (C-OML)的患者与改用其他生物制剂(S-OML)的患者进行比较。结果:纳入47例患者。C-OML组实现了与S-OML组相当的恶化控制,中位OML剂量为300 mg/月,导致个人支付显著降低(p < 0.01)。与S-OML组相比,C-OML组体重过重的患病率更高(p = 0.04),嗜酸性慢性鼻窦炎的患病率更低(p < 0.01),变应性鼻炎的患病率有更高的趋势(p = 0.06)。使用OML有效控制哮喘与非严重的2型炎症(嗜酸性粒细胞< 300/μL和FeNO < 50 ppb)相关。结论:非重度2型炎症和高BMI患者使用OML可有效控制哮喘,降低治疗成本。确定这种表型可以提高严重哮喘患者生物治疗的成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Asthma and Allergy
Journal of Asthma and Allergy Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
185
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, reports, editorials and commentaries on the following topics: Asthma; Pulmonary physiology; Asthma related clinical health; Clinical immunology and the immunological basis of disease; Pharmacological interventions and new therapies. Although the main focus of the journal will be to publish research and clinical results in humans, preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信