Areal differences in the utilization of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ulla Junttola, Siiri Hietanen, Sanna Lahtinen, Juha-Matti Isokangas, Lasse Raatiniemi, Timo Kaakinen, Merja Vakkala, Janne Liisanantti
{"title":"Areal differences in the utilization of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke.","authors":"Ulla Junttola, Siiri Hietanen, Sanna Lahtinen, Juha-Matti Isokangas, Lasse Raatiniemi, Timo Kaakinen, Merja Vakkala, Janne Liisanantti","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckaf154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endovascular therapy (EVT) is standard care for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion, but its availability is limited in areas with long distances. It has also been demonstrated that there are differences in the utilization of thrombectomy related to socioeconomic factors. The aim of this study is to examine regional differences in the utilization of mechanical thrombectomy and outcome within one comprehensive stroke center district in terms of distance and income. This retrospective single-center study included 352 patients with mechanical thrombectomy in Oulu University Hospital catchment area between the years 2015 and 2019. Socioeconomic status was determined according to the income of residential area. Age-adjusted rate was significantly higher in the highest income areas compared to the lowest and middle third areas; 52.29 (95% CI, 42.85-61.72)/100 000 vs. 34.33 (95% CI, 28.14-40.52) vs. 38.03 (95% CI, 31.14-44.92)/100 000 inhabitants/year. The corresponding rates in rural areas were: 73.37 (95% CI, 53.23-93.51) vs. 37.11 (95% CI, 28.66-45.57) vs. 45.44 (95% CI, 34.72-56.16)/100 000 inhabitants/year. In this study, we found significant differences in the utilization of the EVT within one comprehensive stroke center district. These differences are explained by the income and the rurality of the residential area.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endovascular therapy (EVT) is standard care for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion, but its availability is limited in areas with long distances. It has also been demonstrated that there are differences in the utilization of thrombectomy related to socioeconomic factors. The aim of this study is to examine regional differences in the utilization of mechanical thrombectomy and outcome within one comprehensive stroke center district in terms of distance and income. This retrospective single-center study included 352 patients with mechanical thrombectomy in Oulu University Hospital catchment area between the years 2015 and 2019. Socioeconomic status was determined according to the income of residential area. Age-adjusted rate was significantly higher in the highest income areas compared to the lowest and middle third areas; 52.29 (95% CI, 42.85-61.72)/100 000 vs. 34.33 (95% CI, 28.14-40.52) vs. 38.03 (95% CI, 31.14-44.92)/100 000 inhabitants/year. The corresponding rates in rural areas were: 73.37 (95% CI, 53.23-93.51) vs. 37.11 (95% CI, 28.66-45.57) vs. 45.44 (95% CI, 34.72-56.16)/100 000 inhabitants/year. In this study, we found significant differences in the utilization of the EVT within one comprehensive stroke center district. These differences are explained by the income and the rurality of the residential area.

急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗应用的地域差异。
血管内治疗(EVT)是大血管闭塞引起的急性缺血性卒中的标准治疗,但在距离较远的地区,其可用性有限。研究还表明,社会经济因素对血栓切除术的使用存在差异。本研究的目的是根据距离和收入,检查在一个综合卒中中心区域内机械取栓的使用和结果的区域差异。本回顾性单中心研究纳入2015 - 2019年奥卢大学医院集水区352例机械取栓患者。社会经济地位是根据居住区域的收入来确定的。收入最高地区的年龄调整率明显高于收入最低和中间三分之一地区;52.29 (95% CI, 42.85-61.72)/ 100000 vs. 34.33 (95% CI, 28.14-40.52) vs. 38.03 (95% CI, 31.14-44.92)/ 100000居民/年。农村地区相应的发病率分别为:73.37 (95% CI, 53.23-93.51) vs. 37.11 (95% CI, 28.66-45.57) vs. 45.44 (95% CI, 34.72-56.16)/10万居民/年。在这项研究中,我们发现EVT在一个综合卒中中心地区的使用存在显著差异。这些差异可以用收入和居住区的乡村性来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Public Health
European Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Public Health (EJPH) is a multidisciplinary journal aimed at attracting contributions from epidemiology, health services research, health economics, social sciences, management sciences, ethics and law, environmental health sciences, and other disciplines of relevance to public health. The journal provides a forum for discussion and debate of current international public health issues, with a focus on the European Region. Bi-monthly issues contain peer-reviewed original articles, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, news, letters to the editor, announcements of events, and various other features.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信