Predictors of Engagement in Community-based Residential Mental Health Rehabilitation: Modelling of a cross-sectional Statewide Benchmarking Dataset from Queensland, Australia.
Olivia Falvey, Donna Jones, Terry Stedman, Stephen Parker
{"title":"Predictors of Engagement in Community-based Residential Mental Health Rehabilitation: Modelling of a cross-sectional Statewide Benchmarking Dataset from Queensland, Australia.","authors":"Olivia Falvey, Donna Jones, Terry Stedman, Stephen Parker","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01512-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Engaging residents with the support available at community-based residential mental health rehabilitation facilities is an ongoing challenge for health services. This study explored factors associated with residential rehabilitation engagement across Queensland, Australia through regression modelling of cross-sectional data from a statewide benchmarking activity completed in 2023 (n = 208). The Residential Rehabilitation Engagement Scale (RRES) assessed each resident's rehabilitation engagement. A broad range of potential predictors were considered, including resident and unit-level variables. Only 45.2% of residents had an average RRES score consistent with being engaged with rehabilitation support usually or always. Higher levels of rehabilitation engagement were significantly associated with lower levels of psychosocial disability (B = - 0.413, p < .001), length of treatment (B = - 0.165, p = .008), care under the integrated staffing model (B = 0.156, p = .012), higher staff recovery knowledge and attitudes (B = 0.138, p = .037), and physical illness or disability (B = 0.129, p = .045). In conclusion, engagement in residential rehabilitation was associated with both resident and staff factors. The observation that engagement was higher where unit staff endorsed recovery knowledge and attitudes, and under the integrated staffing model is important. This suggests potential modifiable service characteristics that may support improved rehabilitation engagement in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Mental Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-025-01512-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Engaging residents with the support available at community-based residential mental health rehabilitation facilities is an ongoing challenge for health services. This study explored factors associated with residential rehabilitation engagement across Queensland, Australia through regression modelling of cross-sectional data from a statewide benchmarking activity completed in 2023 (n = 208). The Residential Rehabilitation Engagement Scale (RRES) assessed each resident's rehabilitation engagement. A broad range of potential predictors were considered, including resident and unit-level variables. Only 45.2% of residents had an average RRES score consistent with being engaged with rehabilitation support usually or always. Higher levels of rehabilitation engagement were significantly associated with lower levels of psychosocial disability (B = - 0.413, p < .001), length of treatment (B = - 0.165, p = .008), care under the integrated staffing model (B = 0.156, p = .012), higher staff recovery knowledge and attitudes (B = 0.138, p = .037), and physical illness or disability (B = 0.129, p = .045). In conclusion, engagement in residential rehabilitation was associated with both resident and staff factors. The observation that engagement was higher where unit staff endorsed recovery knowledge and attitudes, and under the integrated staffing model is important. This suggests potential modifiable service characteristics that may support improved rehabilitation engagement in the future.
期刊介绍:
Community Mental Health Journal focuses on the needs of people experiencing serious forms of psychological distress, as well as the structures established to address those needs. Areas of particular interest include critical examination of current paradigms of diagnosis and treatment, socio-structural determinants of mental health, social hierarchies within the public mental health systems, and the intersection of public mental health programs and social/racial justice and health equity. While this is the journal of the American Association for Community Psychiatry, we welcome manuscripts reflecting research from a range of disciplines on recovery-oriented services, public health policy, clinical delivery systems, advocacy, and emerging and innovative practices.