The impact of cancer expectations on psychological responses following a cancer signal detected result in asymptomatic multi-cancer detection (MCED) testing.

IF 6.8 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Laura A V Marlow, Ninian Schmeising-Barnes, Jo Waller
{"title":"The impact of cancer expectations on psychological responses following a cancer signal detected result in asymptomatic multi-cancer detection (MCED) testing.","authors":"Laura A V Marlow, Ninian Schmeising-Barnes, Jo Waller","doi":"10.1038/s41416-025-03180-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multi-cancer detection (MCED) blood tests have the potential to screen for early-stage cancers. Understanding how people experience an MCED cancer signal result is vital prior to any future implementation. We explored experiences in a trial context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A subset of 41 participants in the NHS-Galleri trial (NCT05611632), with a cancer signal detected result, were interviewed. We selected: 20 participants with cancer found (self-reported) and 21 without cancer (following tests). Transcripts were analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Expectations of cancer played a pivotal role in emotional, cognitive and social responses, and were influenced by participants' experiences of health and symptoms. While the cancer signal was often unexpected, the predicted cancer signal origin made sense when consistent with family history or health issues. During the period of diagnostic uncertainty, views of healthiness or lack of family history were sometimes used to self-reassure. For some, a cancer diagnosis was unexpected; for others, expectations of cancer had gradually increased. For those without cancer, believing that it could be present affected their sense of reassurance.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Information about the meaning of a cancer signal will be needed if MCED screening is implemented. Patient support could be designed around their expectations of cancer at each stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":9243,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-025-03180-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multi-cancer detection (MCED) blood tests have the potential to screen for early-stage cancers. Understanding how people experience an MCED cancer signal result is vital prior to any future implementation. We explored experiences in a trial context.

Methods: A subset of 41 participants in the NHS-Galleri trial (NCT05611632), with a cancer signal detected result, were interviewed. We selected: 20 participants with cancer found (self-reported) and 21 without cancer (following tests). Transcripts were analysed thematically.

Results: Expectations of cancer played a pivotal role in emotional, cognitive and social responses, and were influenced by participants' experiences of health and symptoms. While the cancer signal was often unexpected, the predicted cancer signal origin made sense when consistent with family history or health issues. During the period of diagnostic uncertainty, views of healthiness or lack of family history were sometimes used to self-reassure. For some, a cancer diagnosis was unexpected; for others, expectations of cancer had gradually increased. For those without cancer, believing that it could be present affected their sense of reassurance.

Discussion: Information about the meaning of a cancer signal will be needed if MCED screening is implemented. Patient support could be designed around their expectations of cancer at each stage.

癌症预期对无症状多癌检测(MCED)检测结果中癌症信号检测后心理反应的影响。
背景:多癌检测(MCED)血液检查具有筛查早期癌症的潜力。了解人们如何体验MCED癌症信号结果是至关重要的,在任何未来的实施之前。我们在试验的背景下探索经验。方法:在NHS-Galleri试验(NCT05611632)中,对41名具有癌症信号检测结果的参与者进行访谈。我们选择:20名发现癌症的参与者(自我报告)和21名没有癌症的参与者(经过测试)。转录本按主题进行分析。结果:对癌症的预期在情绪、认知和社会反应中起着关键作用,并受到参与者健康经历和症状的影响。虽然癌症信号通常是出乎意料的,但当与家族病史或健康问题一致时,预测的癌症信号起源是有意义的。在诊断不确定期间,有时使用健康或没有家族史的观点来自我安慰。对一些人来说,癌症诊断是出乎意料的;对另一些人来说,患癌症的可能性逐渐增加。对于那些没有癌症的人来说,相信癌症可能存在会影响他们的安心感。讨论:如果实施MCED筛查,将需要有关癌症信号含义的信息。病人的支持可以根据他们对每个阶段癌症的预期来设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Cancer
British Journal of Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
383
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Cancer is one of the most-cited general cancer journals, publishing significant advances in translational and clinical cancer research.It also publishes high-quality reviews and thought-provoking comment on all aspects of cancer prevention,diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信