Incidence, treatment, and survival of patients with appendiceal adenocarcinomas and low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: linked Swedish national registry study.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
BJS Open Pub Date : 2025-09-08 DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zraf109
Joel Johansson, Roland E Andersson, Per Loftås, Stefan Redéen
{"title":"Incidence, treatment, and survival of patients with appendiceal adenocarcinomas and low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: linked Swedish national registry study.","authors":"Joel Johansson, Roland E Andersson, Per Loftås, Stefan Redéen","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Appendiceal adenocarcinomas and low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMNs) are rare tumours. Much of the existing knowledge is derived from registry-based studies, particularly the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database in the USA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used data from the Swedish Cancer Registry, Swedish Cause of Death Registry, and the National Patient Registry to analyse demographic characteristics and outcomes of patients diagnosed with appendiceal adenocarcinoma or LAMN between 2005 and 2019. Kaplan-Meier survivor function, multivariate Cox regression analysis, standardized mortality ratio, and net survival were used to assess survival. Incidence was estimated by direct standardization from 2005 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 1159 patients with appendiceal neoplasms were included, with a mean age at diagnosis of 63.3 years. The incidence of adenocarcinomas was stable, whereas the incidence of LAMNs increased from 2012 onwards. Patients with non-mucinous adenocarcinomas who underwent colonic resection had better survival outcomes than patients treated with appendicectomy alone. For mucinous adenocarcinomas, colonic resection did not improve survival outcomes compared with appendicectomy. Patients with non-mucinous adenocarcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma, or LAMN who underwent cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) had favourable overall and net survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Colonic resection increased survival only for patients with non-mucinous adenocarcinomas. Since 2012, the incidence of LAMN has increased, most likely due to changes in diagnostic and coding practices, but the incidence of appendiceal adenocarcinomas has remained stable. The survival benefit of CRS-HIPEC is observed in a very specific patient population, emphasizing the importance of careful patient selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419524/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraf109","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Appendiceal adenocarcinomas and low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMNs) are rare tumours. Much of the existing knowledge is derived from registry-based studies, particularly the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database in the USA.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Swedish Cancer Registry, Swedish Cause of Death Registry, and the National Patient Registry to analyse demographic characteristics and outcomes of patients diagnosed with appendiceal adenocarcinoma or LAMN between 2005 and 2019. Kaplan-Meier survivor function, multivariate Cox regression analysis, standardized mortality ratio, and net survival were used to assess survival. Incidence was estimated by direct standardization from 2005 to 2019.

Results: In all, 1159 patients with appendiceal neoplasms were included, with a mean age at diagnosis of 63.3 years. The incidence of adenocarcinomas was stable, whereas the incidence of LAMNs increased from 2012 onwards. Patients with non-mucinous adenocarcinomas who underwent colonic resection had better survival outcomes than patients treated with appendicectomy alone. For mucinous adenocarcinomas, colonic resection did not improve survival outcomes compared with appendicectomy. Patients with non-mucinous adenocarcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma, or LAMN who underwent cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) had favourable overall and net survival.

Conclusion: Colonic resection increased survival only for patients with non-mucinous adenocarcinomas. Since 2012, the incidence of LAMN has increased, most likely due to changes in diagnostic and coding practices, but the incidence of appendiceal adenocarcinomas has remained stable. The survival benefit of CRS-HIPEC is observed in a very specific patient population, emphasizing the importance of careful patient selection.

Abstract Image

阑尾腺癌和低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤患者的发病率、治疗和生存率:瑞典国家登记研究
背景:阑尾腺癌和低级别阑尾粘液瘤(LAMNs)是罕见的肿瘤。许多现有的知识来源于基于登记的研究,特别是美国的监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库。方法:本回顾性队列研究使用瑞典癌症登记处、瑞典死因登记处和国家患者登记处的数据,分析2005年至2019年间诊断为阑尾腺癌或LAMN的患者的人口统计学特征和结局。使用Kaplan-Meier生存函数、多变量Cox回归分析、标准化死亡率和净生存来评估生存。2005年至2019年的发病率采用直接标准化估算。结果:共纳入1159例阑尾肿瘤患者,诊断时平均年龄63.3岁。腺癌的发病率保持稳定,而lamn的发病率从2012年开始上升。非黏液性腺癌患者行结肠切除术比单独行阑尾切除术有更好的生存结果。对于黏液性腺癌,与阑尾切除术相比,结肠切除术并没有改善生存结果。非黏液性腺癌、黏液性腺癌或LAMN患者接受细胞减缩手术和腹腔内加热化疗(CRS-HIPEC)后,总生存率和净生存率均较好。结论:结肠切除术仅能提高非黏液性腺癌患者的生存率。自2012年以来,LAMN的发病率有所增加,很可能是由于诊断和编码实践的变化,但阑尾腺癌的发病率保持稳定。CRS-HIPEC的生存获益是在一个非常特定的患者群体中观察到的,这强调了仔细选择患者的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJS Open
BJS Open SURGERY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
144
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信