Soil carbon to go: Agroforestry practices including coffee sequester the highest amounts of soil C in mountainous Southern Ethiopia

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Abera Tilahun Abdi, Bamlaku Ayenew Kassa, Hafte Mebrahten Tesfay, Hans Sandén, Boris Rewald
{"title":"Soil carbon to go: Agroforestry practices including coffee sequester the highest amounts of soil C in mountainous Southern Ethiopia","authors":"Abera Tilahun Abdi,&nbsp;Bamlaku Ayenew Kassa,&nbsp;Hafte Mebrahten Tesfay,&nbsp;Hans Sandén,&nbsp;Boris Rewald","doi":"10.1007/s10457-025-01298-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Agroforestry (AF) systems are considered more sustainable than conventional agriculture because high production and cover enhance carbon sequestration and water and nutrient retention. However, above- and below-ground carbon stocks in different traditional agroforestry systems and in relation to adjacent land use types remain poorly understood, especially in East Africa. This study evaluates the carbon sequestration potential of three agroforestry systems—coffee, enset, and khat—in the Sidama region of southern Ethiopia compared to cropland and eucalyptus woodlots. Ten plots per land use type were selected, and carbon stocks were assessed by estimating woody biomass using allometric equations, and soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks by soil sampling to 60 cm depth. AF systems store significantly higher SOC than cropland and partially woodlots, with coffee-based AF systems sequestering the most carbon. In AF practices, approximately 79% of total carbon stocks were found in the soil, while woody biomass accounted for the remaining 21%. The study highlights a decreasing trend in total carbon stocks from AF-Coffee to cropland, with similar values in woodlots compared to AF practices. The higher SOC levels in these agroforestry plots are attributed to greater plant species diversity and minimal soil disturbance. Our results indicate that AF systems, particularly those based on coffee and enset, are key to enhancing soil carbon storage and promoting sustainable land use practices across the region. The study provides important insights into carbon mapping and climate change mitigation strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"99 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-025-01298-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agroforestry (AF) systems are considered more sustainable than conventional agriculture because high production and cover enhance carbon sequestration and water and nutrient retention. However, above- and below-ground carbon stocks in different traditional agroforestry systems and in relation to adjacent land use types remain poorly understood, especially in East Africa. This study evaluates the carbon sequestration potential of three agroforestry systems—coffee, enset, and khat—in the Sidama region of southern Ethiopia compared to cropland and eucalyptus woodlots. Ten plots per land use type were selected, and carbon stocks were assessed by estimating woody biomass using allometric equations, and soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks by soil sampling to 60 cm depth. AF systems store significantly higher SOC than cropland and partially woodlots, with coffee-based AF systems sequestering the most carbon. In AF practices, approximately 79% of total carbon stocks were found in the soil, while woody biomass accounted for the remaining 21%. The study highlights a decreasing trend in total carbon stocks from AF-Coffee to cropland, with similar values in woodlots compared to AF practices. The higher SOC levels in these agroforestry plots are attributed to greater plant species diversity and minimal soil disturbance. Our results indicate that AF systems, particularly those based on coffee and enset, are key to enhancing soil carbon storage and promoting sustainable land use practices across the region. The study provides important insights into carbon mapping and climate change mitigation strategies.

土壤碳流失:包括咖啡在内的农林业做法在埃塞俄比亚南部山区吸收了最多的土壤碳
农林业系统被认为比传统农业更具可持续性,因为高产量和高覆盖加强了碳固存以及水和养分的保留。然而,不同传统农林业系统的地上和地下碳储量以及与邻近土地利用类型的关系仍然知之甚少,特别是在东非。本研究评估了埃塞俄比亚南部Sidama地区三种农林复合系统(咖啡、enset和阿拉伯茶)与农田和桉树林地的固碳潜力。每种土地利用类型选择10个样地,利用异速生长方程估算木本生物量,利用60 cm深度土壤取样评估土壤有机碳(SOC)储量。AF系统比农田和部分林地储存的有机碳要高得多,其中以咖啡为基础的AF系统吸收的碳最多。在AF实践中,土壤中的碳储量约占总碳储量的79%,而木质生物量占剩余的21%。该研究强调,从AF- coffee到农田的总碳储量呈下降趋势,与AF做法相比,林地的碳储量相似。这些农林业样地土壤有机碳含量较高的原因是植物物种多样性较大,土壤干扰较小。我们的研究结果表明,AF系统,特别是基于咖啡和enset的系统,是增强整个地区土壤碳储存和促进可持续土地利用实践的关键。这项研究为碳制图和减缓气候变化战略提供了重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信