Systematic Literature Review on Effort Estimation by Software Development Life Cycle Phases

IF 3.6 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Sulem Martínez-Aguilar;Ángel J. Sánchez-García;Cuauhtémoc López-Martín;Jorge Octavio Ocharán-Hernández
{"title":"Systematic Literature Review on Effort Estimation by Software Development Life Cycle Phases","authors":"Sulem Martínez-Aguilar;Ángel J. Sánchez-García;Cuauhtémoc López-Martín;Jorge Octavio Ocharán-Hernández","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3605102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several techniques have been proposed to estimate the total effort of the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) rather than by SDLC phase to be performed for an independent team. An accurate effort estimation is needed for software managers to create realistic plans and allocate resources appropriately to independent teams. Therefore, this Systematic Literature Review (SLR), unlike other secondary studies, examines the current state of effort estimation by SDLC phase instead of estimating it across the entire SDLC. In addition, this SLR identifies metaheuristics used for optimizing the parameters of effort estimation models. We searched for studies whose objective has been to propose models for estimating the effort of specific SDLC phases, rather than total SDLC effort. We firstly identified 216 studies, and finally we selected 31 of them published between 2014 and march 2025 in journals and conferences. The majority of the studies investigated effort estimation in the testing and maintenance phases, mainly using Machine Learning (ML) techniques. Functional size and project characteristics were the most common explanatory variables. International Software Benchmarking Standards Group was the predominant dataset for training models and the mean of Absolute Residual was the recommended precision measure. Cross-validation was the most used model validation method. We can conclude that more research is needed on effort estimation by SDLC phases such as requirements specification, design, and construction, as well as to further explore ML and metaheuristics to improve the prediction accuracies of models.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"13 ","pages":"153340-153358"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11146651","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11146651/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several techniques have been proposed to estimate the total effort of the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) rather than by SDLC phase to be performed for an independent team. An accurate effort estimation is needed for software managers to create realistic plans and allocate resources appropriately to independent teams. Therefore, this Systematic Literature Review (SLR), unlike other secondary studies, examines the current state of effort estimation by SDLC phase instead of estimating it across the entire SDLC. In addition, this SLR identifies metaheuristics used for optimizing the parameters of effort estimation models. We searched for studies whose objective has been to propose models for estimating the effort of specific SDLC phases, rather than total SDLC effort. We firstly identified 216 studies, and finally we selected 31 of them published between 2014 and march 2025 in journals and conferences. The majority of the studies investigated effort estimation in the testing and maintenance phases, mainly using Machine Learning (ML) techniques. Functional size and project characteristics were the most common explanatory variables. International Software Benchmarking Standards Group was the predominant dataset for training models and the mean of Absolute Residual was the recommended precision measure. Cross-validation was the most used model validation method. We can conclude that more research is needed on effort estimation by SDLC phases such as requirements specification, design, and construction, as well as to further explore ML and metaheuristics to improve the prediction accuracies of models.
软件开发生命周期阶段工作量估算的系统文献综述
已经提出了几种技术来估计软件开发生命周期(SDLC)的总工作量,而不是由独立团队执行的SDLC阶段。软件经理需要一个准确的工作量评估来创建现实的计划,并将资源适当地分配给独立的团队。因此,本系统性文献综述(SLR)不同于其他次要研究,它考察了SDLC阶段的工作量估算的当前状态,而不是在整个SDLC中进行估算。此外,该SLR确定了用于优化工作量估计模型参数的元启发式。我们搜索了一些研究,这些研究的目的是提出模型来估计特定SDLC阶段的工作量,而不是总SDLC工作量。我们首先确定了216项研究,最后我们选择了2014年至2025年3月在期刊和会议上发表的31项研究。大多数研究调查了测试和维护阶段的工作量估计,主要使用机器学习(ML)技术。功能规模和项目特征是最常见的解释变量。国际软件基准标准组是训练模型的主要数据集,绝对残差的平均值是推荐的精度度量。交叉验证是最常用的模型验证方法。我们可以得出结论,需要对SDLC阶段(如需求规范、设计和构建)的工作量估计进行更多的研究,以及进一步探索ML和元启发式来提高模型的预测准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Access
IEEE Access COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest. IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on: Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals. Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering. Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques. Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信