Sulem Martínez-Aguilar;Ángel J. Sánchez-García;Cuauhtémoc López-Martín;Jorge Octavio Ocharán-Hernández
{"title":"Systematic Literature Review on Effort Estimation by Software Development Life Cycle Phases","authors":"Sulem Martínez-Aguilar;Ángel J. Sánchez-García;Cuauhtémoc López-Martín;Jorge Octavio Ocharán-Hernández","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3605102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several techniques have been proposed to estimate the total effort of the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) rather than by SDLC phase to be performed for an independent team. An accurate effort estimation is needed for software managers to create realistic plans and allocate resources appropriately to independent teams. Therefore, this Systematic Literature Review (SLR), unlike other secondary studies, examines the current state of effort estimation by SDLC phase instead of estimating it across the entire SDLC. In addition, this SLR identifies metaheuristics used for optimizing the parameters of effort estimation models. We searched for studies whose objective has been to propose models for estimating the effort of specific SDLC phases, rather than total SDLC effort. We firstly identified 216 studies, and finally we selected 31 of them published between 2014 and march 2025 in journals and conferences. The majority of the studies investigated effort estimation in the testing and maintenance phases, mainly using Machine Learning (ML) techniques. Functional size and project characteristics were the most common explanatory variables. International Software Benchmarking Standards Group was the predominant dataset for training models and the mean of Absolute Residual was the recommended precision measure. Cross-validation was the most used model validation method. We can conclude that more research is needed on effort estimation by SDLC phases such as requirements specification, design, and construction, as well as to further explore ML and metaheuristics to improve the prediction accuracies of models.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"13 ","pages":"153340-153358"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11146651","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11146651/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Several techniques have been proposed to estimate the total effort of the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) rather than by SDLC phase to be performed for an independent team. An accurate effort estimation is needed for software managers to create realistic plans and allocate resources appropriately to independent teams. Therefore, this Systematic Literature Review (SLR), unlike other secondary studies, examines the current state of effort estimation by SDLC phase instead of estimating it across the entire SDLC. In addition, this SLR identifies metaheuristics used for optimizing the parameters of effort estimation models. We searched for studies whose objective has been to propose models for estimating the effort of specific SDLC phases, rather than total SDLC effort. We firstly identified 216 studies, and finally we selected 31 of them published between 2014 and march 2025 in journals and conferences. The majority of the studies investigated effort estimation in the testing and maintenance phases, mainly using Machine Learning (ML) techniques. Functional size and project characteristics were the most common explanatory variables. International Software Benchmarking Standards Group was the predominant dataset for training models and the mean of Absolute Residual was the recommended precision measure. Cross-validation was the most used model validation method. We can conclude that more research is needed on effort estimation by SDLC phases such as requirements specification, design, and construction, as well as to further explore ML and metaheuristics to improve the prediction accuracies of models.
IEEE AccessCOMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍:
IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest.
IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on:
Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals.
Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering.
Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques.
Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.