Kevser A. Hışıroğlu, Özgür Akçalı, Ozan Toker, Orhan İçelli
{"title":"Comparative study of 3D-Printable polymers for beta interaction behaviours via monte carlo simulations","authors":"Kevser A. Hışıroğlu, Özgür Akçalı, Ozan Toker, Orhan İçelli","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2025.111864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid advancement of 3D printing technologies has revolutionised production in many sectors due to the versatile properties of printable materials. Thermal, mechanical and functional performance of 3D printable components make them suitable for use in radiation-intensive environments such as betavoltaic cells and clinical phantoms. This study investigates the behaviour of 3D-printable materials, including ABS, PLA, PETG, TPU, and UV resins<strong>,</strong> under exposure to various beta radiation sources, such as <sup>3</sup>H, <sup>63</sup>Ni, <sup>14</sup>C, <sup>147</sup>Pm, <sup>99</sup>Tc, <sup>90</sup>Sr, and <sup>90</sup>Y, through a comparative analysis of their beta radiation attenuation efficiency, energy absorption, and dose transmission characteristics. TPU exhibited a surface flux reduction of approximately 72.3 % for tritium (<sup>3</sup>H) and 69.8 % for nickel-63 (<sup>63</sup>Ni) at a thickness of 0.1 µm, demonstrating better attenuation performance for low-energy beta radiation. A new metric, Half Absorption Thickness (HAT), was introduced to quantify the shielding capacity more precisely; the lowest HAT was found for TPU under <sup>3</sup>H (0.08 mm), and the highest for PETG under <sup>99</sup>Tc (1.12 mm). The derived logarithmic models (R<sup>2</sup> > 0.99) enable estimation of shielding efficiency as a function of material thickness and beta energy. Among all tested combinations, ABS exhibited the best attenuation performance against high-energy beta particles, with a maximum flux reduction of 87.1 % for <sup>90</sup>Sr and a corresponding HAT of 0.48 mm, establishing it as the most efficient barrier material in the studied energy range. Conversely, UV-cured resin demonstrated the highest beta transmission, particularly under <sup>3</sup>H and <sup>63</sup>Ni exposure, making it a suitable candidate for applications where controlled dose delivery is desired. These findings contribute to the literature by offering a comparative evaluation of the attenuation performance of 3D printable materials against different beta radiation sources and by providing a basis for material selection in beta applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 111864"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454925006814","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The rapid advancement of 3D printing technologies has revolutionised production in many sectors due to the versatile properties of printable materials. Thermal, mechanical and functional performance of 3D printable components make them suitable for use in radiation-intensive environments such as betavoltaic cells and clinical phantoms. This study investigates the behaviour of 3D-printable materials, including ABS, PLA, PETG, TPU, and UV resins, under exposure to various beta radiation sources, such as 3H, 63Ni, 14C, 147Pm, 99Tc, 90Sr, and 90Y, through a comparative analysis of their beta radiation attenuation efficiency, energy absorption, and dose transmission characteristics. TPU exhibited a surface flux reduction of approximately 72.3 % for tritium (3H) and 69.8 % for nickel-63 (63Ni) at a thickness of 0.1 µm, demonstrating better attenuation performance for low-energy beta radiation. A new metric, Half Absorption Thickness (HAT), was introduced to quantify the shielding capacity more precisely; the lowest HAT was found for TPU under 3H (0.08 mm), and the highest for PETG under 99Tc (1.12 mm). The derived logarithmic models (R2 > 0.99) enable estimation of shielding efficiency as a function of material thickness and beta energy. Among all tested combinations, ABS exhibited the best attenuation performance against high-energy beta particles, with a maximum flux reduction of 87.1 % for 90Sr and a corresponding HAT of 0.48 mm, establishing it as the most efficient barrier material in the studied energy range. Conversely, UV-cured resin demonstrated the highest beta transmission, particularly under 3H and 63Ni exposure, making it a suitable candidate for applications where controlled dose delivery is desired. These findings contribute to the literature by offering a comparative evaluation of the attenuation performance of 3D printable materials against different beta radiation sources and by providing a basis for material selection in beta applications.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.