A comparative study of hybrid decision tree–deep learning models in the detection of intracranial arachnoid cysts

Aziz Ilyas Ozturk , Osman Yıldırım , Ebru İdman , Emrah İdman
{"title":"A comparative study of hybrid decision tree–deep learning models in the detection of intracranial arachnoid cysts","authors":"Aziz Ilyas Ozturk ,&nbsp;Osman Yıldırım ,&nbsp;Ebru İdman ,&nbsp;Emrah İdman","doi":"10.1016/j.neuri.2025.100234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Intracranial arachnoid cysts are fluid-filled lesions within the arachnoid membrane, which pose significant diagnostic challenges due to their varying sizes, subtle radiographic characteristics, and often unclear clinical correlations. Traditional diagnostic methods, such as MRI or CT imaging, rely on expert interpretation but suffer from issues like inter-observer variability and diagnostic delays, especially for small or atypically located cysts. To address these challenges, this study integrates machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques into neuroimaging diagnostics, introducing three novel hybrid models: DecisionTree-ViT, DecisionTree-Random Forest, and DecisionTree-ResNet50. The DecisionTree-Random Forest hybrid model showed remarkable performance, achieving 96.3% accuracy and 0.98 AUC in differentiating arachnoid cysts from normal cerebrospinal fluid spaces and other intracranial cystic lesions. This model combines deep learning's pattern recognition strengths with decision tree transparency, meeting the clinical need for both accuracy and explainability. The DecisionTree-ResNet50 variant excelled in detecting small (&lt;1 cm) cysts, with a sensitivity of 89.7%, outperforming standalone ResNet50 (82.4%). Specialized contrast-enhancement protocols and anatomically constrained augmentation techniques were applied to address class imbalance and improve model calibration. The DecisionTree-ViT model also demonstrated strong performance, with 94% accuracy and well-calibrated confidence estimates, making it reliable for clinical decision-making. The study compares these hybrid models against pure deep learning and traditional machine learning approaches, highlighting their superior performance in challenging diagnostic scenarios. The integrated interpretability features allow radiologists to validate algorithmic findings, fostering trust in AI-assisted diagnostics. This research showcases the potential of hybrid AI models to transform neuroimaging diagnostics and improve patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74295,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience informatics","volume":"5 4","pages":"Article 100234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772528625000494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intracranial arachnoid cysts are fluid-filled lesions within the arachnoid membrane, which pose significant diagnostic challenges due to their varying sizes, subtle radiographic characteristics, and often unclear clinical correlations. Traditional diagnostic methods, such as MRI or CT imaging, rely on expert interpretation but suffer from issues like inter-observer variability and diagnostic delays, especially for small or atypically located cysts. To address these challenges, this study integrates machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques into neuroimaging diagnostics, introducing three novel hybrid models: DecisionTree-ViT, DecisionTree-Random Forest, and DecisionTree-ResNet50. The DecisionTree-Random Forest hybrid model showed remarkable performance, achieving 96.3% accuracy and 0.98 AUC in differentiating arachnoid cysts from normal cerebrospinal fluid spaces and other intracranial cystic lesions. This model combines deep learning's pattern recognition strengths with decision tree transparency, meeting the clinical need for both accuracy and explainability. The DecisionTree-ResNet50 variant excelled in detecting small (<1 cm) cysts, with a sensitivity of 89.7%, outperforming standalone ResNet50 (82.4%). Specialized contrast-enhancement protocols and anatomically constrained augmentation techniques were applied to address class imbalance and improve model calibration. The DecisionTree-ViT model also demonstrated strong performance, with 94% accuracy and well-calibrated confidence estimates, making it reliable for clinical decision-making. The study compares these hybrid models against pure deep learning and traditional machine learning approaches, highlighting their superior performance in challenging diagnostic scenarios. The integrated interpretability features allow radiologists to validate algorithmic findings, fostering trust in AI-assisted diagnostics. This research showcases the potential of hybrid AI models to transform neuroimaging diagnostics and improve patient outcomes.
混合决策树-深度学习模型在颅内蛛网膜囊肿检测中的比较研究
颅内蛛网膜囊肿是蛛网膜内充满液体的病变,由于其大小不一,放射学特征微妙,临床相关性不明确,给诊断带来了重大挑战。传统的诊断方法,如MRI或CT成像,依赖于专家的解释,但存在观察者之间的差异和诊断延迟等问题,特别是对于小的或非典型位置的囊肿。为了解决这些挑战,本研究将机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)技术集成到神经成像诊断中,引入了三种新的混合模型:DecisionTree-ViT、DecisionTree-Random Forest和DecisionTree-ResNet50。DecisionTree-Random Forest混合模型对蛛网膜囊肿与正常脑脊液间隙及其他颅内囊性病变的鉴别准确率为96.3%,AUC为0.98。该模型将深度学习的模式识别优势与决策树透明度相结合,满足了临床对准确性和可解释性的需求。DecisionTree-ResNet50变体在检测小(1 cm)囊肿方面表现出色,灵敏度为89.7%,优于单独的ResNet50(82.4%)。专门的对比度增强方案和解剖学约束增强技术应用于解决类别不平衡和改进模型校准。DecisionTree-ViT模型也表现出了很强的性能,准确率为94%,置信度估计良好,可用于临床决策。该研究将这些混合模型与纯深度学习和传统机器学习方法进行了比较,突出了它们在具有挑战性的诊断场景中的优越性能。集成的可解释性功能允许放射科医生验证算法结果,促进对人工智能辅助诊断的信任。这项研究展示了混合人工智能模型在改变神经影像学诊断和改善患者预后方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroscience informatics
Neuroscience informatics Surgery, Radiology and Imaging, Information Systems, Neurology, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Signal Processing, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Health Informatics, Clinical Neurology, Pathology and Medical Technology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信