Beyond the "eye of the storm": A processual and multi-layered approach to global value chain resilience

IF 6.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Federica Sacco , Giovanna Magnani , Pietro Previtali
{"title":"Beyond the \"eye of the storm\": A processual and multi-layered approach to global value chain resilience","authors":"Federica Sacco ,&nbsp;Giovanna Magnani ,&nbsp;Pietro Previtali","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Repeated shocks to business continuity, such as extreme natural events, a global pandemic, geopolitical tensions, trade wars and actual wars, have challenged and are challenging multinational enterprises in their role as “orchestrators” within global value chains (GVCs). Consequently, interest in GVC resilience has grown in the field of international business. This study investigates how control and location decisions in GVCs can contribute to the resilience of the overall value chain. To answer this question, we develop a multiple case study in the context of the pharmaceutical and medical-device sectors, and propose a theoretical model of GVC resilience that untangles the mechanisms that help multinational enterprises and their value chains withstand shocks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 6","pages":"Article 102460"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593125000733","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Repeated shocks to business continuity, such as extreme natural events, a global pandemic, geopolitical tensions, trade wars and actual wars, have challenged and are challenging multinational enterprises in their role as “orchestrators” within global value chains (GVCs). Consequently, interest in GVC resilience has grown in the field of international business. This study investigates how control and location decisions in GVCs can contribute to the resilience of the overall value chain. To answer this question, we develop a multiple case study in the context of the pharmaceutical and medical-device sectors, and propose a theoretical model of GVC resilience that untangles the mechanisms that help multinational enterprises and their value chains withstand shocks.
超越“风暴眼”:全球价值链弹性的流程和多层方法
极端自然事件、全球大流行病、地缘政治紧张局势、贸易战和实际战争等对业务连续性的反复冲击,已经并正在挑战跨国企业在全球价值链(gvc)中的“协调者”角色。因此,在国际商业领域,对全球价值链弹性的兴趣有所增长。本研究探讨了全球价值链中的控制和选址决策如何对整个价值链的弹性做出贡献。为了回答这个问题,我们在制药和医疗器械行业的背景下进行了多个案例研究,并提出了一个全球价值链弹性的理论模型,该模型理清了帮助跨国企业及其价值链抵御冲击的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
6.90%
发文量
95
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Business Review (IBR) stands as a premier international journal within the realm of international business and proudly serves as the official publication of the European International Business Academy (EIBA). This esteemed journal publishes original and insightful papers addressing the theory and practice of international business, encompassing a broad spectrum of topics such as firms' internationalization strategies, cross-border management of operations, and comparative studies of business environments across different countries. In essence, IBR is dedicated to disseminating research that informs the international operations of firms, whether they are SMEs or large MNEs, and guides the actions of policymakers in both home and host countries. The journal warmly welcomes conceptual papers, empirical studies, and review articles, fostering contributions from various disciplines including strategy, finance, management, marketing, economics, HRM, and organizational studies. IBR embraces methodological diversity, with equal openness to papers utilizing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信