The company you keep: Syndicate formation in venture capitalists’ cross-border investments

IF 6.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Harald Kollmann, Jakob Müllner, Jonas Puck
{"title":"The company you keep: Syndicate formation in venture capitalists’ cross-border investments","authors":"Harald Kollmann,&nbsp;Jakob Müllner,&nbsp;Jonas Puck","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper studies how venture capitalists trade-off agency and resource considerations when syndicating for cross-border investments. We argue that syndicate size and the decision to partner with local VCs involves a complex trade-off between the potential agency costs from multiple VCs in one syndicate and the benefits of foreign VCs with complementary resource endowments. Based on data of 15,725 cross-border VC investments we show that, in the presence of geographic and psychic distances between VC syndicate members, VCs reduce complexity from syndicate size (agency perspective) but are more likely to invite local VC co-investors (resource perspective). VC firms with high international recognition rely less on other syndicate members’ resources and minimize agency costs through smaller syndicates. VC firms with high host-country recognition face lower local partner search costs and have a hgher probility to have local partners in the syndicate. Our paper contributes a framework for syndication in cross-border VC investment that recognizes the importance of distance between VCs and the role of recognition of VCs as a valuable resource in the syndication trade-off.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 6","pages":"Article 102424"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096959312500037X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper studies how venture capitalists trade-off agency and resource considerations when syndicating for cross-border investments. We argue that syndicate size and the decision to partner with local VCs involves a complex trade-off between the potential agency costs from multiple VCs in one syndicate and the benefits of foreign VCs with complementary resource endowments. Based on data of 15,725 cross-border VC investments we show that, in the presence of geographic and psychic distances between VC syndicate members, VCs reduce complexity from syndicate size (agency perspective) but are more likely to invite local VC co-investors (resource perspective). VC firms with high international recognition rely less on other syndicate members’ resources and minimize agency costs through smaller syndicates. VC firms with high host-country recognition face lower local partner search costs and have a hgher probility to have local partners in the syndicate. Our paper contributes a framework for syndication in cross-border VC investment that recognizes the importance of distance between VCs and the role of recognition of VCs as a valuable resource in the syndication trade-off.
你保留的公司:风险投资家跨境投资的辛迪加组织
本文研究了风险资本家在进行跨境投资时如何权衡代理和资源考虑。我们认为,辛迪加的规模和与当地风投合作的决定涉及一个辛迪加中多个风投的潜在代理成本与具有互补资源禀赋的外国风投的利益之间的复杂权衡。基于15,725个跨境风险投资的数据,我们表明,在风险投资辛迪加成员之间存在地理和心理距离的情况下,风险投资公司从辛迪加规模(代理角度)降低了复杂性,但更有可能邀请当地的风险投资共同投资者(资源角度)。国际知名度高的风投公司较少依赖其他辛迪加成员的资源,并通过较小的辛迪加将代理成本降至最低。东道国认知度高的风险投资公司寻找当地合作伙伴的成本较低,并且在辛迪加中拥有当地合作伙伴的可能性较高。本文为跨境风险投资中的联合投资提供了一个框架,该框架认识到风险投资公司之间距离的重要性以及风险投资公司在联合交易中作为一种有价值资源的认可所起的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
6.90%
发文量
95
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Business Review (IBR) stands as a premier international journal within the realm of international business and proudly serves as the official publication of the European International Business Academy (EIBA). This esteemed journal publishes original and insightful papers addressing the theory and practice of international business, encompassing a broad spectrum of topics such as firms' internationalization strategies, cross-border management of operations, and comparative studies of business environments across different countries. In essence, IBR is dedicated to disseminating research that informs the international operations of firms, whether they are SMEs or large MNEs, and guides the actions of policymakers in both home and host countries. The journal warmly welcomes conceptual papers, empirical studies, and review articles, fostering contributions from various disciplines including strategy, finance, management, marketing, economics, HRM, and organizational studies. IBR embraces methodological diversity, with equal openness to papers utilizing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信