{"title":"The company you keep: Syndicate formation in venture capitalists’ cross-border investments","authors":"Harald Kollmann, Jakob Müllner, Jonas Puck","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper studies how venture capitalists trade-off agency and resource considerations when syndicating for cross-border investments. We argue that syndicate size and the decision to partner with local VCs involves a complex trade-off between the potential agency costs from multiple VCs in one syndicate and the benefits of foreign VCs with complementary resource endowments. Based on data of 15,725 cross-border VC investments we show that, in the presence of geographic and psychic distances between VC syndicate members, VCs reduce complexity from syndicate size (agency perspective) but are more likely to invite local VC co-investors (resource perspective). VC firms with high international recognition rely less on other syndicate members’ resources and minimize agency costs through smaller syndicates. VC firms with high host-country recognition face lower local partner search costs and have a hgher probility to have local partners in the syndicate. Our paper contributes a framework for syndication in cross-border VC investment that recognizes the importance of distance between VCs and the role of recognition of VCs as a valuable resource in the syndication trade-off.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 6","pages":"Article 102424"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096959312500037X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper studies how venture capitalists trade-off agency and resource considerations when syndicating for cross-border investments. We argue that syndicate size and the decision to partner with local VCs involves a complex trade-off between the potential agency costs from multiple VCs in one syndicate and the benefits of foreign VCs with complementary resource endowments. Based on data of 15,725 cross-border VC investments we show that, in the presence of geographic and psychic distances between VC syndicate members, VCs reduce complexity from syndicate size (agency perspective) but are more likely to invite local VC co-investors (resource perspective). VC firms with high international recognition rely less on other syndicate members’ resources and minimize agency costs through smaller syndicates. VC firms with high host-country recognition face lower local partner search costs and have a hgher probility to have local partners in the syndicate. Our paper contributes a framework for syndication in cross-border VC investment that recognizes the importance of distance between VCs and the role of recognition of VCs as a valuable resource in the syndication trade-off.
期刊介绍:
The International Business Review (IBR) stands as a premier international journal within the realm of international business and proudly serves as the official publication of the European International Business Academy (EIBA). This esteemed journal publishes original and insightful papers addressing the theory and practice of international business, encompassing a broad spectrum of topics such as firms' internationalization strategies, cross-border management of operations, and comparative studies of business environments across different countries. In essence, IBR is dedicated to disseminating research that informs the international operations of firms, whether they are SMEs or large MNEs, and guides the actions of policymakers in both home and host countries. The journal warmly welcomes conceptual papers, empirical studies, and review articles, fostering contributions from various disciplines including strategy, finance, management, marketing, economics, HRM, and organizational studies. IBR embraces methodological diversity, with equal openness to papers utilizing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method approaches.