The effects of oral narrative interventions on second language learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 5.6 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ting Yao , Xiaotong Xi , Pilar Prieto
{"title":"The effects of oral narrative interventions on second language learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Ting Yao ,&nbsp;Xiaotong Xi ,&nbsp;Pilar Prieto","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Oral narrative interventions involve training in telling and retelling stories in language teaching and learning. In this study, we systematically reviewed 50 peer-reviewed publications with a pretest-and-posttest design on oral narrative interventions in second language (L2) learning and meta-analyzed their effectiveness on language outcomes based on 29 studies that reported sufficient statistical information. First, the systematic review found that two distinct intervention approaches were commonly used in foreign language classrooms across various proficiency and education levels: traditional storytelling, which involves verbally telling or retelling a story, and digital storytelling, which integrates digital recordings of storytelling or retelling with computer-based multimedia resources. Second, the meta-analysis found a medium-to-large overall effect of oral narrative interventions on language outcomes, particularly L2 speaking, reading, grammar, and vocabulary. Moderator analyses showed that the effect of the interventions was not affected by intervention approaches (i.e., traditional and digital storytelling), but was moderated by L2 proficiency level and intervention duration, with intermediate learners and medium-term intervention showing the greatest gains. We conclude that both storytelling approaches are equally effective for L2 learning. Teachers should consider students’ language proficiency and intervention duration when implementing oral narrative interventions. More attention should be paid to future studies to test the effects of various components of oral narrative interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 103835"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25002453","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oral narrative interventions involve training in telling and retelling stories in language teaching and learning. In this study, we systematically reviewed 50 peer-reviewed publications with a pretest-and-posttest design on oral narrative interventions in second language (L2) learning and meta-analyzed their effectiveness on language outcomes based on 29 studies that reported sufficient statistical information. First, the systematic review found that two distinct intervention approaches were commonly used in foreign language classrooms across various proficiency and education levels: traditional storytelling, which involves verbally telling or retelling a story, and digital storytelling, which integrates digital recordings of storytelling or retelling with computer-based multimedia resources. Second, the meta-analysis found a medium-to-large overall effect of oral narrative interventions on language outcomes, particularly L2 speaking, reading, grammar, and vocabulary. Moderator analyses showed that the effect of the interventions was not affected by intervention approaches (i.e., traditional and digital storytelling), but was moderated by L2 proficiency level and intervention duration, with intermediate learners and medium-term intervention showing the greatest gains. We conclude that both storytelling approaches are equally effective for L2 learning. Teachers should consider students’ language proficiency and intervention duration when implementing oral narrative interventions. More attention should be paid to future studies to test the effects of various components of oral narrative interventions.
口头叙述干预对第二语言学习的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析
口头叙述干预包括在语言教学和学习中训练讲故事和复述故事。在这项研究中,我们系统地回顾了50篇同行评议的论文,这些论文采用了口头叙事干预第二语言学习的前测和后测设计,并基于29项报告了充分统计信息的研究,对其对语言结果的有效性进行了meta分析。首先,系统回顾发现两种不同的干预方法在不同水平和教育水平的外语课堂中普遍使用:传统讲故事,包括口头讲故事或复述故事,以及数字讲故事,将讲故事或复述的数字记录与基于计算机的多媒体资源相结合。其次,荟萃分析发现口头叙事干预对语言结果有中等到较大的总体影响,特别是第二语言口语、阅读、语法和词汇。调节分析表明,干预的效果不受干预方法(即传统和数字讲故事)的影响,但受到第二语言熟练程度和干预时间的调节,中级学习者和中期干预表现出最大的收益。我们得出结论,这两种讲故事的方法对第二语言学习同样有效。教师在实施口头叙事干预时应考虑学生的语言能力和干预时间。未来的研究应更多地关注测试口头叙事干预的各个组成部分的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
System
System Multiple-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信