Melanie L Fritz,Michael A Jaeb,Sarah I Zaza,Alex Dudek,Kristine L Kwekkeboom,Anne Buffington,Leah M Gober,Margaret L Schwarze
{"title":"Clinical Momentum: An Observational Study Identifying Latent Forces Driving Surgical Interventions for Older Adults Near the End of Life.","authors":"Melanie L Fritz,Michael A Jaeb,Sarah I Zaza,Alex Dudek,Kristine L Kwekkeboom,Anne Buffington,Leah M Gober,Margaret L Schwarze","doi":"10.1097/sla.0000000000006934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nWe evaluated the empirical fit of our model of clinical momentum for older adults with life-limiting illness undergoing unplanned surgery.\r\n\r\nBACKGROUND\r\nOlder adults often undergo surgery near the end of life, in contrast to generally stated preferences. Systems forces promoting intervention may produce nonbeneficial treatment despite advances in communication. We conducted an observational study to understand how a conceptual model of clinical momentum might apply to patients with life-limiting illnesses having surgery.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe interviewed 29 interdisciplinary clinicians caring for 8 patients age 65+ with life-limiting illness who underwent unplanned surgical intervention. We evaluated physical, cognitive, and social behavioral processes related to the course of care. We used content analysis to code interview transcripts and higher-level analysis to understand the empirical fit of the conceptual model.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nWe found evidence of model components, including \"fix it\" and \"recognition-primed decision-making\" that related to actual clinical events and processes that occurred for patients, promoting a default of surgical intervention followed by an accumulating \"cascade\" of interventions that generated a perception of \"sunk costs.\" We identified novel momentum accelerators including binary options and care fragmentation. Clinicians expressed concerns that surgery was nonbeneficial but were unable to disrupt this momentum in the moment of decision-making around surgery. We identified momentum disruption when the patient's abnormality could not be fixed and additional surgery was not considered or offered.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nClinical momentum characterizes systems forces leading to acute surgical intervention for patients with life-limiting illnesses despite surgeon concerns that the treatment does more harm than good. These forces are difficult to disrupt and may require interventions beyond improved communication to reduce nonbeneficial therapy.","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006934","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
We evaluated the empirical fit of our model of clinical momentum for older adults with life-limiting illness undergoing unplanned surgery.
BACKGROUND
Older adults often undergo surgery near the end of life, in contrast to generally stated preferences. Systems forces promoting intervention may produce nonbeneficial treatment despite advances in communication. We conducted an observational study to understand how a conceptual model of clinical momentum might apply to patients with life-limiting illnesses having surgery.
METHODS
We interviewed 29 interdisciplinary clinicians caring for 8 patients age 65+ with life-limiting illness who underwent unplanned surgical intervention. We evaluated physical, cognitive, and social behavioral processes related to the course of care. We used content analysis to code interview transcripts and higher-level analysis to understand the empirical fit of the conceptual model.
RESULTS
We found evidence of model components, including "fix it" and "recognition-primed decision-making" that related to actual clinical events and processes that occurred for patients, promoting a default of surgical intervention followed by an accumulating "cascade" of interventions that generated a perception of "sunk costs." We identified novel momentum accelerators including binary options and care fragmentation. Clinicians expressed concerns that surgery was nonbeneficial but were unable to disrupt this momentum in the moment of decision-making around surgery. We identified momentum disruption when the patient's abnormality could not be fixed and additional surgery was not considered or offered.
CONCLUSIONS
Clinical momentum characterizes systems forces leading to acute surgical intervention for patients with life-limiting illnesses despite surgeon concerns that the treatment does more harm than good. These forces are difficult to disrupt and may require interventions beyond improved communication to reduce nonbeneficial therapy.
期刊介绍:
The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.