Systematic video analysis of ankle sprain injuries in elite male football (soccer): Injury mechanisms, situational patterns, biomechanics and neurocognitive errors study: A study on 140 consecutive players.

IF 5
Matthew Buckthorpe, Evert Verhagen, Pieter D'Hooghe, Leonardo Osti, Stefano Di Paolo, Francesco Della Villa
{"title":"Systematic video analysis of ankle sprain injuries in elite male football (soccer): Injury mechanisms, situational patterns, biomechanics and neurocognitive errors study: A study on 140 consecutive players.","authors":"Matthew Buckthorpe, Evert Verhagen, Pieter D'Hooghe, Leonardo Osti, Stefano Di Paolo, Francesco Della Villa","doi":"10.1002/ksa.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the mechanisms, situational patterns, biomechanics and neurocognitive errors related ankle sprain injuries of professional male football players during match play.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>There were 166 consecutive ankle sprain injuries identified occurring during official matches in players of top European football leagues. One hundred and forty (84%) injury videos were analysed for mechanism and situational pattern, with biomechanics on 20 players. Neurocognitive errors were investigated for all noncontact injuries. Three independent reviewers evaluated each video. Ankle sprain injury epidemiology-month, timing within the match and pitch location at the time of injury and time-loss according to sprain type was also documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More injuries occurred in offensive (n = 89, 64%) than defensive (n = 51, 36%) situations (p < 0.001). Seventy (50%) direct contact, 42 (30%) indirect contact and 28 (20%) noncontact injuries were categorised. There were 67 (48%) inversion, 30 (21%) high ankle, 25 (17%) eversion, 6 with combination of high ankle and eversion (4%) and 12 (9%) unsure injuries. Four main situational patterns were described: (i) being tackled (n = 59, 42%); (ii) tackling/pressing (n = 34, 24%); (iii) landing from a jump (n = 16, 11%) and (iv) sliding (n = 7, 5%). Inversion injuries were associated with internal rotation, while high ankle injuries typically involved toe contact with the ground, slight plantar flexion and foot eversion. A neurocognitive error was documented 59% of noncontact injuries. A similar number of injuries occurred during the 1st (n = 71, 51%) and 2nd (n = 69, 49%) half (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Half of ankle sprain injuries occurred after direct contact, 3 in 10 after indirect contact and only 2 in 10 without contact. Injury prevention practices should consider mechanical perturbation, playing situation and neurocognitive factors when designing programmes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":520702,"journal":{"name":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the mechanisms, situational patterns, biomechanics and neurocognitive errors related ankle sprain injuries of professional male football players during match play.

Methods: There were 166 consecutive ankle sprain injuries identified occurring during official matches in players of top European football leagues. One hundred and forty (84%) injury videos were analysed for mechanism and situational pattern, with biomechanics on 20 players. Neurocognitive errors were investigated for all noncontact injuries. Three independent reviewers evaluated each video. Ankle sprain injury epidemiology-month, timing within the match and pitch location at the time of injury and time-loss according to sprain type was also documented.

Results: More injuries occurred in offensive (n = 89, 64%) than defensive (n = 51, 36%) situations (p < 0.001). Seventy (50%) direct contact, 42 (30%) indirect contact and 28 (20%) noncontact injuries were categorised. There were 67 (48%) inversion, 30 (21%) high ankle, 25 (17%) eversion, 6 with combination of high ankle and eversion (4%) and 12 (9%) unsure injuries. Four main situational patterns were described: (i) being tackled (n = 59, 42%); (ii) tackling/pressing (n = 34, 24%); (iii) landing from a jump (n = 16, 11%) and (iv) sliding (n = 7, 5%). Inversion injuries were associated with internal rotation, while high ankle injuries typically involved toe contact with the ground, slight plantar flexion and foot eversion. A neurocognitive error was documented 59% of noncontact injuries. A similar number of injuries occurred during the 1st (n = 71, 51%) and 2nd (n = 69, 49%) half (p > 0.05).

Discussion: Half of ankle sprain injuries occurred after direct contact, 3 in 10 after indirect contact and only 2 in 10 without contact. Injury prevention practices should consider mechanical perturbation, playing situation and neurocognitive factors when designing programmes.

Level of evidence: Level IV.

优秀男子足球运动员踝关节扭伤损伤的系统视频分析:损伤机制、情境模式、生物力学和神经认知错误研究——基于140名连续运动员的研究。
目的:探讨职业男子足球运动员比赛过程中踝关节扭伤损伤的机制、情境模式、生物力学和神经认知错误。方法:对166例欧洲顶级联赛正式比赛中发生的连续踝关节扭伤进行分析。对140个(84%)受伤视频进行了机制和情境模式分析,并对20名球员进行了生物力学分析。研究了所有非接触性损伤的神经认知错误。三个独立的评论家对每个视频进行评估。踝关节扭伤的流行病学-月份,比赛时间和受伤时的球场位置以及根据扭伤类型的时间损失也被记录下来。结果:进攻损伤发生率(n = 89, 64%)高于防守损伤发生率(n = 51, 36%) (p < 0.05)。讨论:一半的踝关节扭伤发生在直接接触后,3 / 10发生在间接接触后,只有2 / 10没有接触。损伤预防实践在设计方案时应考虑机械干扰、比赛情况和神经认知因素。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信