Accelerated rehabilitation after proximal hamstring avulsion repair is safe and effective: Outcomes from randomized controlled trial of two different rehabilitation regimes.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to identify the safety and effectiveness of an accelerated (AR) versus conservative (CR) rehabilitation regimen following surgical repair of proximal hamstring tendon avulsions.

Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) allocated patients undergoing proximal hamstring tendon repair to either a braced, partial weight-bearing rehabilitation regime (CR = 30) or an accelerated, unbraced regime, which permitted full weight-bearing as tolerated (AR = 27). Patients were evaluated pre-operatively and at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months post-surgery, via patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), patient satisfaction and global rating of change (GRC) scores. Objective measures, including the single (SHD), triple (THD) and triple crossover (TCHD) hop tests, were assessed at 6 months, as was peak isokinetic knee extensor and flexor torque.

Results: Of the 57 patients recruited, 4 were excluded from the CR group (2 infections; 2 re-injuries). The CR group contained 57% males with a mean age of 45.6 (standard deviation [SD] = 13.4). The AR group contained 44% males with a mean age of 50.5 (SD = 11.8). Therefore, 53 patients (CR = 26, AR = 27) were reviewed at the final 6-month follow-up. Within-group analyses showed that both groups significantly improved in all PROMs (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between groups for satisfaction, GRC scores, knee extensor torque, knee flexor torque, limb symmetry indices, re-injuries or complications at 6 months.

Conclusions: This RCT has highlighted the safety and efficacy of a post-operative rehabilitation pathway that includes weight-bearing as tolerated, without bracing, in patients after proximal hamstring tendon repair.

Level of evidence: Level I.