Program Evaluation of an Adolescent Intervention Program: Substance Use Education Program for At-Risk Adolescents.

IF 0.7
Shanea Clancy, Brandy Mechling
{"title":"Program Evaluation of an Adolescent Intervention Program: Substance Use Education Program for At-Risk Adolescents.","authors":"Shanea Clancy, Brandy Mechling","doi":"10.1097/JAN.0000000000000641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the United States, approximately 20 million individuals, age 12 and older, have a substance use disorder (SUD), with an average age of first-time use at 13 years old. Evidence has shown that many SUDs begin in adolescence, and involvement with the legal system can ensue. Adolescents with first-time drug and alcohol arrests can be referred to an Adolescent Intervention Program (AIP) as an alternative to jailtime from the juvenile court system. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to evaluate the effectiveness of an AIP, a faith-based drug and alcohol prevention program for adolescents. The W.K. Kellogg's Step-by-Step Guide to Evaluation (2017) was utilized to evaluate the program. Kellogg's Empowerment and Culturally Responsive Evaluation approaches influenced the development of key stakeholder structured interviews (n = 5). The total number of adolescent program participants during the evaluation period was N = 2,437, with an estimated 98% program completion rate. Stakeholder interviewees reported that \"for every 100 AIP participants, there is an average of 1-2 returning for a second try.\" And, \"For every 100 AIP participants, an average of 5 or 6 are sent back to court, or a 5% AIP recidivism rate.\" AIP program recommendations included the development of a participant data tracking system, facility leadership succession plan, a volunteer orientation and policy manual, educational tool kits for parents and adolescents, and increasing the number of parent-involved sessions. Faith-based drug and alcohol recovery programs for adolescents can be an effective means of SUD prevention and an alternative to jail.</p>","PeriodicalId":94062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of addictions nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of addictions nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAN.0000000000000641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the United States, approximately 20 million individuals, age 12 and older, have a substance use disorder (SUD), with an average age of first-time use at 13 years old. Evidence has shown that many SUDs begin in adolescence, and involvement with the legal system can ensue. Adolescents with first-time drug and alcohol arrests can be referred to an Adolescent Intervention Program (AIP) as an alternative to jailtime from the juvenile court system. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to evaluate the effectiveness of an AIP, a faith-based drug and alcohol prevention program for adolescents. The W.K. Kellogg's Step-by-Step Guide to Evaluation (2017) was utilized to evaluate the program. Kellogg's Empowerment and Culturally Responsive Evaluation approaches influenced the development of key stakeholder structured interviews (n = 5). The total number of adolescent program participants during the evaluation period was N = 2,437, with an estimated 98% program completion rate. Stakeholder interviewees reported that "for every 100 AIP participants, there is an average of 1-2 returning for a second try." And, "For every 100 AIP participants, an average of 5 or 6 are sent back to court, or a 5% AIP recidivism rate." AIP program recommendations included the development of a participant data tracking system, facility leadership succession plan, a volunteer orientation and policy manual, educational tool kits for parents and adolescents, and increasing the number of parent-involved sessions. Faith-based drug and alcohol recovery programs for adolescents can be an effective means of SUD prevention and an alternative to jail.

青少年干预项目评估:高危青少年物质使用教育项目。
在美国,大约有2000万12岁及以上的人患有药物使用障碍(SUD),首次使用药物的平均年龄为13岁。有证据表明,许多sud始于青少年时期,随后可能会涉及法律体系。第一次因毒品和酒精被捕的青少年可以被转介到青少年干预方案(AIP),作为少年法庭系统监禁的另一种选择。这一质量改进项目的目的是评价一个以信仰为基础的青少年毒品和酒精预防方案的有效性。凯洛格(W.K. Kellogg)的逐步评估指南(2017)用于评估该计划。凯洛格的授权和文化响应性评估方法影响了关键利益相关者结构化访谈的发展(n = 5)。在评估期间,青少年项目参与者的总人数为2437人,估计项目完成率为98%。涉众受访者报告说:“每100名AIP参与者中,平均有1-2人会再次尝试。”而且,“每100名AIP参与者中,平均有5到6人被送回法庭,或者AIP再犯率为5%。”AIP计划的建议包括建立参与者数据跟踪系统、设施领导继任计划、志愿者指导和政策手册、家长和青少年教育工具包,以及增加家长参与会议的次数。以信仰为基础的青少年毒品和酒精康复计划可以是预防SUD的有效手段,也是监狱的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信