Hospitals in Some States Under Report Medicaid Discharge Counts in Cost Report Data.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kelsey Chalmers, Omkar Waghmare, Valérie Gopinath, Vikas Saini
{"title":"Hospitals in Some States Under Report Medicaid Discharge Counts in Cost Report Data.","authors":"Kelsey Chalmers, Omkar Waghmare, Valérie Gopinath, Vikas Saini","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.70043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate discrepancies in Medicaid enrollees' hospital discharges reported in two data sources widely used in health services research: the CMS Hospital Cost Report Information System (HCRIS) and the T-MSIS Analytic Files (TAF).</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>This is a descriptive study comparing inpatient discharges reported in the two data sets. We included inpatient admissions at general hospitals in 2020-2021.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>We used HCRIS data covering reporting periods starting in 2020 and ending sometime in 2021 (this varied by hospital) and extracted the reported total and Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) funded Medicaid discharges and patient days. We used the 2020 and 2021 TAF inpatient files and included inpatient admissions within each hospital's HCRIS reporting period, and calculated discharges for each hospital.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>There were 25 states where some hospitals had higher TAF discharge counts than HCRIS, and these same hospitals had inconsistent reporting of HMO-funded Medicaid discharges and patient days in HCRIS. This included California, New York, and Texas. There were 20 states with similar values reported in both HCRIS and TAF, and 9 of these were in states with < 5% of their enrolled Medicaid population in a comprehensive managed care plan.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The discrepancies between HCRIS and TAF data indicate that HCRIS may not reliably capture hospital discharge volumes for Medicaid patients, particularly those funded by managed care. These inconsistencies can misinform policy decisions and evaluations of hospital performance. Policymakers and researchers should exercise caution when using HCRIS data for Medicaid discharge counts and consider supplementing it with TAF or other sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e70043"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate discrepancies in Medicaid enrollees' hospital discharges reported in two data sources widely used in health services research: the CMS Hospital Cost Report Information System (HCRIS) and the T-MSIS Analytic Files (TAF).

Study setting and design: This is a descriptive study comparing inpatient discharges reported in the two data sets. We included inpatient admissions at general hospitals in 2020-2021.

Data sources and analytic sample: We used HCRIS data covering reporting periods starting in 2020 and ending sometime in 2021 (this varied by hospital) and extracted the reported total and Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) funded Medicaid discharges and patient days. We used the 2020 and 2021 TAF inpatient files and included inpatient admissions within each hospital's HCRIS reporting period, and calculated discharges for each hospital.

Principal findings: There were 25 states where some hospitals had higher TAF discharge counts than HCRIS, and these same hospitals had inconsistent reporting of HMO-funded Medicaid discharges and patient days in HCRIS. This included California, New York, and Texas. There were 20 states with similar values reported in both HCRIS and TAF, and 9 of these were in states with < 5% of their enrolled Medicaid population in a comprehensive managed care plan.

Conclusions: The discrepancies between HCRIS and TAF data indicate that HCRIS may not reliably capture hospital discharge volumes for Medicaid patients, particularly those funded by managed care. These inconsistencies can misinform policy decisions and evaluations of hospital performance. Policymakers and researchers should exercise caution when using HCRIS data for Medicaid discharge counts and consider supplementing it with TAF or other sources.

一些州的医院报告医疗补助出院数在成本报告数据。
目的:探讨在医疗服务研究中广泛使用的两种数据来源:CMS医院成本报告信息系统(HCRIS)和T-MSIS分析文件(TAF)中医疗补助参保人出院报告的差异。研究设置和设计:这是一项描述性研究,比较两个数据集报告的住院病人出院情况。我们纳入了2020-2021年综合医院的住院患者。数据来源和分析样本:我们使用的HCRIS数据涵盖了从2020年开始到2021年结束的报告期(这因医院而异),并提取了报告的总数和健康维护组织(HMO)资助的医疗补助出院和患者天数。我们使用了2020年和2021年TAF住院患者档案,并纳入了每家医院HCRIS报告期内的住院患者,并计算了每家医院的出院率。主要发现:有25个州的一些医院的TAF出院数高于HCRIS,而这些医院在HCRIS中报告的hmo资助的医疗补助出院数和病人天数不一致。这包括加利福尼亚、纽约和德克萨斯。有20个州报告的HCRIS和TAF值相似,其中9个州的结论是:HCRIS和TAF数据之间的差异表明HCRIS可能不能可靠地反映医疗补助患者的出院量,特别是那些由管理式医疗资助的患者。这些不一致可能会误导政策决定和对医院绩效的评估。政策制定者和研究人员在使用HCRIS数据进行医疗补助出院计数时应谨慎行事,并考虑用TAF或其他来源补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信