Assistive technology in current occupational therapy practice.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Karen Dishman, Blair Carsone, Juliana Bell, Leslie J Hardman, Olivia Fulton
{"title":"Assistive technology in current occupational therapy practice.","authors":"Karen Dishman, Blair Carsone, Juliana Bell, Leslie J Hardman, Olivia Fulton","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2025.2555238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research found that occupational therapy practitioners desired more training in assistive technology. This study provides further evidence on which assistive technology categories should be included in the education of occupational therapists in the United States, based on the practice setting. Participants were recruited through snowball sampling and were included if they were certified occupational therapists practicing in the United States. A quantitative survey method was utilized, and 392 participant responses were captured through Likert-scale, multiple-choice, and ordinal ranking-scale questions. Of the 12 settings included in the study, eight practice settings reported that wheelchair seating and mobility were the most used assistive technology. Regarding the remaining four practice settings, occupational therapists working in early intervention with children aged 0-3 years reported using communication devices; outpatient hand therapy reported home modifications; mental health professionals reported using cognitive aids; and occupational therapists in the school setting reported using technology for learning disabilities. All participants reported that assistive technology is used \"sometimes\" to \"always,\" regardless of setting. The need for occupational therapists to have an established knowledge base in assistive technology is crucial. This study highlights the association between the practice setting and the use and frequency of assistive technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":51568,"journal":{"name":"Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2025.2555238","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research found that occupational therapy practitioners desired more training in assistive technology. This study provides further evidence on which assistive technology categories should be included in the education of occupational therapists in the United States, based on the practice setting. Participants were recruited through snowball sampling and were included if they were certified occupational therapists practicing in the United States. A quantitative survey method was utilized, and 392 participant responses were captured through Likert-scale, multiple-choice, and ordinal ranking-scale questions. Of the 12 settings included in the study, eight practice settings reported that wheelchair seating and mobility were the most used assistive technology. Regarding the remaining four practice settings, occupational therapists working in early intervention with children aged 0-3 years reported using communication devices; outpatient hand therapy reported home modifications; mental health professionals reported using cognitive aids; and occupational therapists in the school setting reported using technology for learning disabilities. All participants reported that assistive technology is used "sometimes" to "always," regardless of setting. The need for occupational therapists to have an established knowledge base in assistive technology is crucial. This study highlights the association between the practice setting and the use and frequency of assistive technology.

当前职业治疗实践中的辅助技术。
先前的研究发现,职业治疗从业者希望在辅助技术方面得到更多的培训。这项研究提供了进一步的证据,说明哪些辅助技术类别应该包括在美国职业治疗师的教育中,基于实践设置。参与者是通过滚雪球抽样招募的,如果他们是在美国执业的认证职业治疗师,他们就被包括在内。采用定量调查方法,通过李克特量表、多项选择题和顺序排序量表收集392名参与者的回答。在研究中包括的12个环境中,8个实践环境报告说,轮椅座位和移动是使用最多的辅助技术。至于其余四个执业环境,从事0-3岁儿童早期干预工作的职业治疗师报告使用通讯设备;门诊手部治疗报告居家改造;心理健康专业人员报告使用认知辅助工具;学校环境中的职业治疗师报告使用技术治疗学习障碍。所有的参与者都报告说,辅助技术是“有时”到“总是”使用的,无论设置如何。职业治疗师需要在辅助技术方面有一个成熟的知识基础,这是至关重要的。本研究强调了实践环境与辅助技术的使用和频率之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Assistive Technology
Assistive Technology REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Assistive Technology is an applied, scientific publication in the multi-disciplinary field of technology for people with disabilities. The journal"s purpose is to foster communication among individuals working in all aspects of the assistive technology arena including researchers, developers, clinicians, educators and consumers. The journal will consider papers from all assistive technology applications. Only original papers will be accepted. Technical notes describing preliminary techniques, procedures, or findings of original scientific research may also be submitted. Letters to the Editor are welcome. Books for review may be sent to authors or publisher.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信