A typology of interdisciplinary collaborations: insights from agri-food transformation research.

IF 5.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Sustainability Science Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-20 DOI:10.1007/s11625-025-01702-x
Benjamin Hofmann, Ueli Reber, Priska Ammann, Julia Dötzer, Jennifer Mark, Chloe McCallum, Milena Wiget, Lucca Zachmann
{"title":"A typology of interdisciplinary collaborations: insights from agri-food transformation research.","authors":"Benjamin Hofmann, Ueli Reber, Priska Ammann, Julia Dötzer, Jennifer Mark, Chloe McCallum, Milena Wiget, Lucca Zachmann","doi":"10.1007/s11625-025-01702-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To understand complex societal transformations, scholars have called for more interdisciplinary research in which researchers from various disciplines collaborate. To support the implementation of such collaborations, we introduce a novel typology of interdisciplinary collaborations developed from the literature and from structured reflection on our own research experience. The typology distinguishes (I) common base, (II) common destination, and (III) sequential link type of interdisciplinary collaborations. Common base refers to an interdisciplinary collaboration at one research stage that later separates into parallel disciplinary work; common destination to a collaboration where separate disciplinary work feeds into joint interdisciplinary work at the next stage; and sequential link to a completed stage of disciplinary research that provides the basis for research in another discipline. We illustrate the typology with a case study of interdisciplinary collaborations in a research project that studied the potential for an evidence-based transformation of agricultural pesticide governance. The project involved researchers from seven natural, health, and social science disciplines who developed a process for forming and maintaining interdisciplinary collaborations. We provide five examples of interdisciplinary collaborations from the project, explaining for each its practical design and implementation, its contribution to overall research goals, and related opportunities and challenges. The examples show that the typology can systematize the thinking about interdisciplinary collaborations and enable critical reflection about interdisciplinary research design and implementation. Based on our reflections as early-career researchers, we conclude with lessons that can inform future interdisciplinary research projects on agri-food transformation and beyond.</p>","PeriodicalId":49457,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability Science","volume":"20 5","pages":"1791-1808"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12414061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-025-01702-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To understand complex societal transformations, scholars have called for more interdisciplinary research in which researchers from various disciplines collaborate. To support the implementation of such collaborations, we introduce a novel typology of interdisciplinary collaborations developed from the literature and from structured reflection on our own research experience. The typology distinguishes (I) common base, (II) common destination, and (III) sequential link type of interdisciplinary collaborations. Common base refers to an interdisciplinary collaboration at one research stage that later separates into parallel disciplinary work; common destination to a collaboration where separate disciplinary work feeds into joint interdisciplinary work at the next stage; and sequential link to a completed stage of disciplinary research that provides the basis for research in another discipline. We illustrate the typology with a case study of interdisciplinary collaborations in a research project that studied the potential for an evidence-based transformation of agricultural pesticide governance. The project involved researchers from seven natural, health, and social science disciplines who developed a process for forming and maintaining interdisciplinary collaborations. We provide five examples of interdisciplinary collaborations from the project, explaining for each its practical design and implementation, its contribution to overall research goals, and related opportunities and challenges. The examples show that the typology can systematize the thinking about interdisciplinary collaborations and enable critical reflection about interdisciplinary research design and implementation. Based on our reflections as early-career researchers, we conclude with lessons that can inform future interdisciplinary research projects on agri-food transformation and beyond.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

跨学科合作的类型学:来自农业食品转化研究的见解。
为了理解复杂的社会转型,学者们呼吁进行更多的跨学科研究,让不同学科的研究人员进行合作。为了支持这种合作的实施,我们从文献和对我们自己的研究经验的结构化反思中引入了一种新的跨学科合作类型。类型学区分了(I)共同基础,(II)共同目标,以及(III)跨学科合作的顺序链接类型。公共基础是指在一个研究阶段的跨学科合作,后来分成平行的学科工作;合作的共同目标,使单独的学科工作在下一阶段进入联合的跨学科工作;并且顺序链接到一个已完成的学科研究阶段,为另一个学科的研究提供基础。我们在一个研究项目中以跨学科合作的案例研究来说明这种类型,该项目研究了农业农药治理的循证转型的潜力。该项目涉及来自七个自然、健康和社会科学学科的研究人员,他们制定了形成和维持跨学科合作的程序。我们从项目中提供了五个跨学科合作的例子,解释了每个例子的实际设计和实施,对总体研究目标的贡献,以及相关的机遇和挑战。实例表明,类型学可以使跨学科合作的思考系统化,并对跨学科研究的设计和实施进行批判性反思。基于我们作为早期职业研究人员的反思,我们总结了一些经验教训,可以为未来关于农业食品转型及其他领域的跨学科研究项目提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainability Science
Sustainability Science 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Sustainability Science offers insights into interactions within and between nature and the rest of human society, and the complex mechanisms that sustain both. The journal promotes science based predictions and impact assessments of global change, and seeks ways to ensure that such knowledge can be understood by society and be used to strengthen the resilience of global natural systems (such as ecosystems, ocean and atmospheric systems, nutrient cycles), social systems (economies, governments, industry) and human systems at the individual level (lifestyles, health, security, and human values).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信