Systematic Review of Authentic Leadership Effects on Patient, Nurse, and System Outcomes.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Kari A Mastro, Suzanne E Courtwright, Susan H Weaver
{"title":"Systematic Review of Authentic Leadership Effects on Patient, Nurse, and System Outcomes.","authors":"Kari A Mastro, Suzanne E Courtwright, Susan H Weaver","doi":"10.1097/NNR.0000000000000855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Authentic leadership in nursing is associated with positive nurse outcomes globally. However, the last published systematic review, in 2018, showed no evidence from the United States and little evidence of effect on patient or health system outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To systematically review, appraise, and synthesize evidence focused on the effect of authentic leadership on nurse, patient, and system outcomes in acute care hospitals in the U.S.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of six databases for quantitative, peer-reviewed research focused on authentic leadership in nursing. Studies with registered nurses in any role conducted in acute care hospitals and published in English between 2004 and 2025 were included. Studies with non-registered nurse participants were excluded. Quality appraisal was conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Results were narratively synthesized, as heterogeneity in study instruments and methodologies rendered meta-analysis unsuitable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final sample consisted of primarily descriptive cross-sectional surveys published between 2017 and 2025. Most sample sizes were < 200, with only two including >500 participants. Five different scales measured authentic leadership. All studies focused on nursing outcomes. Three studies showed to have a negative predictive relationship between authentic leadership and burnout, with a small to moderate effect size. Two studies showed authentic leadership predicted compassion satisfaction with small to moderate effect sizes. The final sample had moderate risks of bias.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Evidence suggests authentic leadership may have a favorable effect on burnout and compassion satisfaction among U.S. nurses in acute care settings. This finding aligns with nationwide reports of nurse burnout and diminished well-being. No evidence is presented that links authentic leadership to patient or system outcomes. For nursing faculty and practice leaders, this limited evidence base poses a challenge in developing evidence-informed curricula and leadership programs. To address this critical gap, nurse scientists should prioritize research examining the effect of authentic leadership on nurse, patient, and system outcomes in U.S. health care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49723,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000855","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Authentic leadership in nursing is associated with positive nurse outcomes globally. However, the last published systematic review, in 2018, showed no evidence from the United States and little evidence of effect on patient or health system outcomes.

Objectives: To systematically review, appraise, and synthesize evidence focused on the effect of authentic leadership on nurse, patient, and system outcomes in acute care hospitals in the U.S.

Methods: A search of six databases for quantitative, peer-reviewed research focused on authentic leadership in nursing. Studies with registered nurses in any role conducted in acute care hospitals and published in English between 2004 and 2025 were included. Studies with non-registered nurse participants were excluded. Quality appraisal was conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Results were narratively synthesized, as heterogeneity in study instruments and methodologies rendered meta-analysis unsuitable.

Results: The final sample consisted of primarily descriptive cross-sectional surveys published between 2017 and 2025. Most sample sizes were < 200, with only two including >500 participants. Five different scales measured authentic leadership. All studies focused on nursing outcomes. Three studies showed to have a negative predictive relationship between authentic leadership and burnout, with a small to moderate effect size. Two studies showed authentic leadership predicted compassion satisfaction with small to moderate effect sizes. The final sample had moderate risks of bias.

Discussion: Evidence suggests authentic leadership may have a favorable effect on burnout and compassion satisfaction among U.S. nurses in acute care settings. This finding aligns with nationwide reports of nurse burnout and diminished well-being. No evidence is presented that links authentic leadership to patient or system outcomes. For nursing faculty and practice leaders, this limited evidence base poses a challenge in developing evidence-informed curricula and leadership programs. To address this critical gap, nurse scientists should prioritize research examining the effect of authentic leadership on nurse, patient, and system outcomes in U.S. health care settings.

真实领导对病人、护士和系统结果影响的系统回顾。
背景:在全球范围内,真正的护理领导与积极的护理结果有关。然而,2018年发表的最后一篇系统综述没有显示来自美国的证据,也没有证据表明对患者或卫生系统的结果有影响。目的:系统地回顾、评估和综合证据,重点关注真实领导对美国急症护理医院护士、患者和系统结果的影响。方法:对六个数据库进行搜索,以获得关于护理中真实领导的定量、同行评议研究。包括2004年至2025年期间在急症护理医院进行的以英语发表的注册护士担任任何角色的研究。未注册护士参与的研究被排除在外。质量评估使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的工具进行。由于研究工具和方法的异质性使得荟萃分析不适合,因此对结果进行了叙述性综合。结果:最终样本主要由2017年至2025年间发布的描述性横断面调查组成。大多数样本量都小于200人,只有两个样本量包括500名参与者。五种不同的量表衡量真正的领导力。所有研究都关注护理结果。三项研究表明,真实型领导与职业倦怠存在负向预测关系,且效应量为小到中等。两项研究表明,真诚的领导对同情满意度的预测具有小到中等的效应。最终样本有中等偏倚风险。讨论:有证据表明,真实的领导可能对美国急症护理机构护士的倦怠和同情满意度有有利影响。这一发现与全国范围内关于护士职业倦怠和幸福感下降的报告相一致。没有证据表明真正的领导与病人或系统的结果有关。对于护理教师和实践领导者来说,这种有限的证据基础对开发循证课程和领导力项目提出了挑战。为了解决这一关键的差距,护士科学家应该优先研究真实领导对美国医疗保健环境中护士、患者和系统结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Research
Nursing Research 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Research is a peer-reviewed journal celebrating over 60 years as the most sought-after nursing resource; it offers more depth, more detail, and more of what today''s nurses demand. Nursing Research covers key issues, including health promotion, human responses to illness, acute care nursing research, symptom management, cost-effectiveness, vulnerable populations, health services, and community-based nursing studies. Each issue highlights the latest research techniques, quantitative and qualitative studies, and new state-of-the-art methodological strategies, including information not yet found in textbooks. Expert commentaries and briefs are also included. In addition to 6 issues per year, Nursing Research from time to time publishes supplemental content not found anywhere else.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信