Effectiveness of backward walking exercises combined with conventional rehabilitation programs on managing pain intensity and disability in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Long-Huei Lin, Yi-Ling Peng, Ling-Wei Yen, Yun-Lin Tsai, Chih-Hsiu Cheng
{"title":"Effectiveness of backward walking exercises combined with conventional rehabilitation programs on managing pain intensity and disability in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Long-Huei Lin, Yi-Ling Peng, Ling-Wei Yen, Yun-Lin Tsai, Chih-Hsiu Cheng","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2025.2550532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knee osteoarthritis (OA) causes pain and diminishes quality of life. Backward walking exercise (BWE) has been shown to improve lower muscle strength and reduce knee adduction moment, making it a recommended intervention for knee OA rehabilitation. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of BWE combined with conventional rehabilitation programs on pain intensity and disability among individuals with knee OA.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Following the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched for studies from the inception to June 2025, prioritizing pain intensity as the primary outcome and disability as the secondary outcome, standardized by Hedges' <i>g</i>. A random-effects model was utilized for data pooling. Subgroup analyses focused on different walking speeds, surfaces, and control group characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the final inclusion of 13 randomized controlled trials, combining BWE with conventional rehabilitation programs was found to significantly reduce pain intensity (Hedges' <i>g</i> = -0.997, 95% CI = -1.373 to -0.620) and improve disability (Hedges' <i>g </i>= -1.015, 95% CI = -1.326 to -0.703). Subgroup analyses revealed larger effect sizes for comfortable walking speed, and treadmill walking. Significant differences were observed across all control group comparisons (<i>p</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BWE combined with rehabilitation showed moderate-to-large effect sizes in reducing pain and disability in knee OA. Future research should assess its standalone efficacy, long-term impact, and certainty of the evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2025.2550532","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) causes pain and diminishes quality of life. Backward walking exercise (BWE) has been shown to improve lower muscle strength and reduce knee adduction moment, making it a recommended intervention for knee OA rehabilitation. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of BWE combined with conventional rehabilitation programs on pain intensity and disability among individuals with knee OA.

Material and methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched for studies from the inception to June 2025, prioritizing pain intensity as the primary outcome and disability as the secondary outcome, standardized by Hedges' g. A random-effects model was utilized for data pooling. Subgroup analyses focused on different walking speeds, surfaces, and control group characteristics.

Results: Based on the final inclusion of 13 randomized controlled trials, combining BWE with conventional rehabilitation programs was found to significantly reduce pain intensity (Hedges' g = -0.997, 95% CI = -1.373 to -0.620) and improve disability (Hedges' g = -1.015, 95% CI = -1.326 to -0.703). Subgroup analyses revealed larger effect sizes for comfortable walking speed, and treadmill walking. Significant differences were observed across all control group comparisons (p < .05).

Conclusion: BWE combined with rehabilitation showed moderate-to-large effect sizes in reducing pain and disability in knee OA. Future research should assess its standalone efficacy, long-term impact, and certainty of the evidence.

后向步行运动结合传统康复计划对膝关节骨关节炎患者疼痛强度和残疾管理的有效性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:膝骨关节炎(OA)引起疼痛并降低生活质量。后退步行运动(BWE)已被证明可以提高下肌力量,减少膝关节内收力矩,使其成为膝关节OA康复的推荐干预措施。本研究旨在评估BWE联合传统康复方案对膝关节OA患者疼痛强度和残疾的有效性。材料和方法:根据PRISMA指南,我们系统地检索了从开始到2025年6月的研究,优先考虑疼痛强度作为主要结局,残疾作为次要结局,由Hedges' g标准化。采用随机效应模型进行数据汇集。亚组分析侧重于不同的步行速度、表面和对照组特征。结果:基于最终纳入的13项随机对照试验,BWE与传统康复方案相结合可显著降低疼痛强度(Hedges' g = -0.997, 95% CI = -1.373至-0.620),改善残疾(Hedges' g = -1.015, 95% CI = -1.326至-0.703)。亚组分析显示,舒适的步行速度和跑步机步行的效果更大。结论:BWE联合康复治疗在减轻膝关节OA患者疼痛和残疾方面具有中等到较大的效果。未来的研究应评估其单独的疗效、长期影响和证据的确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信