Comparative Analysis Methodologies in Nursing Research: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nursing Open Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70300
Lisa McKenna, Christine Sommers
{"title":"Comparative Analysis Methodologies in Nursing Research: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Lisa McKenna, Christine Sommers","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Being a global profession, having evolved differently across different geographical areas, and with increasing global migration, nursing is well positioned to undertake comparative research to facilitate understanding and identify areas for development. Despite this, little is known about comparative research use in nursing, and there is little guidance for researchers on how to approach it. With increasingly sophisticated approaches, there is a need to understand how comparative analysis is currently being used.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review nursing research using comparative analysis as a methodology, specifically exploring approaches employed and topics examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review of published nursing research was conducted using Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Proquest Central, Medline, and Directory of Open Access Journals, with no defined time limits applied and where 'comparative analysis' appeared in the manuscript title. Findings are reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 324 records from which 101 were included in the final review after titles and abstracts and subsequent full-text screening. Analysis was conducted on included studies, involving chronological distribution, publication location, study design, geographical distribution, nature of comparisons, analytic approaches adopted, and methodologists identified. The earliest study was published in 1958, and a steady increase was noted over recent years. While a majority were conducted in the United States, these approaches were used across a large number of countries. Comparisons were made across an extensive array of topic areas, and the emergence of contemporary approaches such as fuzzy logic and qualitative comparative analysis was noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The increase in studies using comparative analysis indicates its applicability for addressing nursing research questions. With growth in sophisticated comparative analysis approaches, there is a need for nursing research courses to include relevant educational preparation for novice researchers.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"12 9","pages":"e70300"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417324/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70300","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Being a global profession, having evolved differently across different geographical areas, and with increasing global migration, nursing is well positioned to undertake comparative research to facilitate understanding and identify areas for development. Despite this, little is known about comparative research use in nursing, and there is little guidance for researchers on how to approach it. With increasingly sophisticated approaches, there is a need to understand how comparative analysis is currently being used.

Objective: To review nursing research using comparative analysis as a methodology, specifically exploring approaches employed and topics examined.

Methods: A scoping review of published nursing research was conducted using Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Proquest Central, Medline, and Directory of Open Access Journals, with no defined time limits applied and where 'comparative analysis' appeared in the manuscript title. Findings are reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.

Results: The search yielded 324 records from which 101 were included in the final review after titles and abstracts and subsequent full-text screening. Analysis was conducted on included studies, involving chronological distribution, publication location, study design, geographical distribution, nature of comparisons, analytic approaches adopted, and methodologists identified. The earliest study was published in 1958, and a steady increase was noted over recent years. While a majority were conducted in the United States, these approaches were used across a large number of countries. Comparisons were made across an extensive array of topic areas, and the emergence of contemporary approaches such as fuzzy logic and qualitative comparative analysis was noted.

Conclusion: The increase in studies using comparative analysis indicates its applicability for addressing nursing research questions. With growth in sophisticated comparative analysis approaches, there is a need for nursing research courses to include relevant educational preparation for novice researchers.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

护理研究中的比较分析方法:范围综述。
背景:作为一个全球性的职业,在不同的地理区域有不同的发展,随着全球移民的增加,护理处于有利地位,可以进行比较研究,以促进理解和确定发展领域。尽管如此,人们对比较研究在护理中的应用知之甚少,研究人员如何接近它的指导也很少。随着越来越复杂的方法,有必要了解比较分析目前是如何使用的。目的:回顾以比较分析为方法论的护理研究,特别探讨所采用的方法和研究的主题。方法:使用护理和相关健康文献累积索引、Proquest Central、Medline和开放获取期刊目录对已发表的护理研究进行范围审查,没有定义时间限制,并且在论文标题中出现“比较分析”。使用系统评价的首选报告项和范围评价的元分析扩展报告结果。结果:检索得到324条记录,其中101条经过标题、摘要和随后的全文筛选后纳入最终评审。对纳入的研究进行分析,包括时间分布、发表地点、研究设计、地理分布、比较的性质、采用的分析方法和确定的方法学家。最早的研究发表于1958年,近年来,这一数字稳步上升。虽然大多数是在美国进行的,但这些方法在许多国家都得到了应用。在广泛的主题领域进行了比较,并注意到诸如模糊逻辑和定性比较分析等当代方法的出现。结论:采用比较分析法的研究越来越多,表明了比较分析法在解决护理研究问题中的适用性。随着复杂的比较分析方法的发展,护理研究课程需要包括对新手研究人员的相关教育准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信