[Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: results of the all-Russian survey].

Q4 Medicine
V P Gavrilyuk, I V Poddubny, D A Severinov, V V Sytkov, Yu A Zubkova, D A Baranov
{"title":"[Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: results of the all-Russian survey].","authors":"V P Gavrilyuk, I V Poddubny, D A Severinov, V V Sytkov, Yu A Zubkova, D A Baranov","doi":"10.17116/hirurgia202509154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study opinions of pediatric surgeons on technical aspects of laparoscopic appendectomy in children.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>An anonymous survey of surgeons was used as the main research method (Google Forms platform). Invitations were sent to specialized institutions (emergency pediatric surgery departments).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 110 pediatric surgeons. Of these, 69% of respondents noted an unspoken rule about the need for only laparoscopic appendectomy. Laparoscopic appendectomies are more common in federal centers compared to regional ones. About 94% of respondents use three-port laparoscopic appendectomy. About 50% of respondents prefer bipolar cauterization for treating the mesentery of the vermiform appendix. Raeder loop is used for vermiform appendix base closure by 97% of respondents.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This survey revealed significant differences in the choice of surgical approach, treating the mesentery and the base of the appendix, material, equipment and other key tactical aspects among specialists. This requires further study of standardization of this intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":35986,"journal":{"name":"Khirurgiya","volume":" 9","pages":"54-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Khirurgiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202509154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To study opinions of pediatric surgeons on technical aspects of laparoscopic appendectomy in children.

Material and methods: An anonymous survey of surgeons was used as the main research method (Google Forms platform). Invitations were sent to specialized institutions (emergency pediatric surgery departments).

Results: The study involved 110 pediatric surgeons. Of these, 69% of respondents noted an unspoken rule about the need for only laparoscopic appendectomy. Laparoscopic appendectomies are more common in federal centers compared to regional ones. About 94% of respondents use three-port laparoscopic appendectomy. About 50% of respondents prefer bipolar cauterization for treating the mesentery of the vermiform appendix. Raeder loop is used for vermiform appendix base closure by 97% of respondents.

Conclusion: This survey revealed significant differences in the choice of surgical approach, treating the mesentery and the base of the appendix, material, equipment and other key tactical aspects among specialists. This requires further study of standardization of this intervention.

儿童腹腔镜阑尾切除术:全俄调查结果。
目的:探讨小儿外科医生对儿童腹腔镜阑尾切除术的技术意见。材料与方法:以外科医生匿名调查为主要研究方法(谷歌Forms平台)。向专科机构(小儿外科急诊科)发出邀请。结果:该研究涉及110名儿科外科医生。其中,69%的受访者指出,只有腹腔镜阑尾切除术的必要性是一条潜规则。与地区中心相比,腹腔镜阑尾切除术在联邦中心更为常见。约94%的受访者使用三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术。约50%的应答者倾向于双极烧灼治疗蚓状阑尾肠系膜。97%的应答者使用雷德尔环作为蚓状阑尾基部闭合。结论:本调查显示专科医师在手术入路选择、肠系膜及阑尾基底处理、材料、设备等关键战术方面存在显著差异。这需要进一步研究这种干预的标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Khirurgiya
Khirurgiya Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: Хирургия отдельных областей сердце, сосуды легкие пищевод молочная железа желудок и двенадцатиперстная кишка кишечник желчевыводящие пути печень
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信