Cast Versus Surgery for Displaced Intra-Articular Distal Radius Fractures in the Elderly a Randomized Clinical Noninferiority Trial (the DART Study).

IF 3.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
JBJS Open Access Pub Date : 2025-09-08 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00060
Dirk P Ter Meulen, Caroline A Selles, Esther J Kret, Anouk A Kruiswijk, Malou E Slichter, Joost W Colaris, Anne Vochteloo, Hanna C Willems, Gerald A Kraan, J Carel Goslings, Ydo V Kleinlugtenbelt, Nienke W Willigenburg, Niels W L Schep, Rudolf W Poolman
{"title":"Cast Versus Surgery for Displaced Intra-Articular Distal Radius Fractures in the Elderly a Randomized Clinical Noninferiority Trial (the DART Study).","authors":"Dirk P Ter Meulen, Caroline A Selles, Esther J Kret, Anouk A Kruiswijk, Malou E Slichter, Joost W Colaris, Anne Vochteloo, Hanna C Willems, Gerald A Kraan, J Carel Goslings, Ydo V Kleinlugtenbelt, Nienke W Willigenburg, Niels W L Schep, Rudolf W Poolman","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence supporting surgery in elderly patients with distal radius fractures is limited, but displaced fractures may benefit from surgery. This study aimed to determine whether casting is noninferior to surgery for patients aged 65 years or older with substantially displaced intra-articular (AO type C) distal radius fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter randomized controlled noninferiority trial included 138 patients (mean age 76 years, SD 6.0) in 19 Dutch hospitals. 138 patients were randomized with a mean age of 76 years (SD 6.0). After 12 months, 126 patients (91%) completed the trial. All patients had a nonacceptable fracture position according to the guideline after reduction. Patients were randomized between casting and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). The primary outcome was the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) at the 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire; quality of life (measured by the EQ-5D-3L); range of motion; grip strength; and complications. Primary analyses were linear mixed models with an intention-to-treat approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean PRWE score at 1-year follow-up for the casting group was 20.4 (95% CI, 15.3-25.6) and in the surgical group was 14.5 (95% CI, 9.9-19.0). The primary intention-to-treat crude analysis was inconclusive regarding noninferiority, with a between-group difference of 6.0 points (95% CI, -2.1 to 14.1) in favor of surgery. However, noninferiority was demonstrated after correction for baseline covariates and in both as-treated analyses. The surgical group had better grip strength but significantly more reoperations (i.e., hardware removal). Subgroup analysis showed greater benefits of surgery in physiologically younger patients, while more frail patients had no advantage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The primary analysis did not demonstrate noninferiority of casting compared with surgery at 1-year follow-up in patients aged 65 years or older with substantially displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures. The benefit of surgery was consistent across multiple outcomes, most notably in the short term and for physiologically younger patients.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>RCT. Level I evidence. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12412739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence supporting surgery in elderly patients with distal radius fractures is limited, but displaced fractures may benefit from surgery. This study aimed to determine whether casting is noninferior to surgery for patients aged 65 years or older with substantially displaced intra-articular (AO type C) distal radius fractures.

Methods: This multicenter randomized controlled noninferiority trial included 138 patients (mean age 76 years, SD 6.0) in 19 Dutch hospitals. 138 patients were randomized with a mean age of 76 years (SD 6.0). After 12 months, 126 patients (91%) completed the trial. All patients had a nonacceptable fracture position according to the guideline after reduction. Patients were randomized between casting and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). The primary outcome was the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) at the 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire; quality of life (measured by the EQ-5D-3L); range of motion; grip strength; and complications. Primary analyses were linear mixed models with an intention-to-treat approach.

Results: The mean PRWE score at 1-year follow-up for the casting group was 20.4 (95% CI, 15.3-25.6) and in the surgical group was 14.5 (95% CI, 9.9-19.0). The primary intention-to-treat crude analysis was inconclusive regarding noninferiority, with a between-group difference of 6.0 points (95% CI, -2.1 to 14.1) in favor of surgery. However, noninferiority was demonstrated after correction for baseline covariates and in both as-treated analyses. The surgical group had better grip strength but significantly more reoperations (i.e., hardware removal). Subgroup analysis showed greater benefits of surgery in physiologically younger patients, while more frail patients had no advantage.

Conclusions: The primary analysis did not demonstrate noninferiority of casting compared with surgery at 1-year follow-up in patients aged 65 years or older with substantially displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures. The benefit of surgery was consistent across multiple outcomes, most notably in the short term and for physiologically younger patients.

Level of evidence: RCT. Level I evidence. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

石膏与手术治疗老年人移位性桡骨远端关节内骨折一项随机临床非效性试验(DART研究)。
背景:支持手术治疗老年桡骨远端骨折的证据有限,但移位骨折可能从手术中获益。本研究旨在确定对于65岁及以上的桡骨远端关节内骨折(AO型C)患者,铸造治疗是否优于手术治疗。方法:该多中心随机对照非劣效性试验纳入了荷兰19家医院的138例患者(平均年龄76岁,SD 6.0)。138例患者随机分组,平均年龄76岁(SD 6.0)。12个月后,126名患者(91%)完成了试验。所有患者复位后均出现不能接受的骨折位置。患者随机分为铸型和切开复位内固定(ORIF)。主要结果是1年随访时的患者腕关节评估(PRWE)。次要结局包括手臂、肩部和手部残疾问卷;生活质量(用EQ-5D-3L测量);活动范围;握力;和并发症。初步分析采用意向治疗方法的线性混合模型。结果:1年随访时铸型组平均PRWE评分为20.4 (95% CI, 15.3-25.6),手术组平均PRWE评分为14.5 (95% CI, 9.9-19.0)。主要意向治疗粗分析在非劣效性方面尚无定论,支持手术的组间差异为6.0点(95% CI, -2.1至14.1)。然而,在对基线协变量进行校正后,在两种治疗分析中都证明了非劣效性。手术组握力较好,但再手术(即取出硬体)明显较多。亚组分析显示,生理上年轻的患者手术获益更大,而身体虚弱的患者则没有优势。结论:在1年的随访中,对于65岁或以上的桡骨远端关节内骨折严重移位的患者,初步分析并没有证明铸造与手术相比具有非劣效性。手术的好处在多种结果中是一致的,最明显的是在短期内和生理上年轻的患者。证据水平:随机对照试验。一级证据。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBJS Open Access
JBJS Open Access Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信