{"title":"[Interleukin-6 as a biochemical marker of intestinal anastomotic leakage].","authors":"M A Chernykh, A M Belousov, K G Shostka","doi":"10.17116/hirurgia202509187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate diagnostic significance of IL-6 compared to CRP for early detection of anastomotic leakage after colon resection for colorectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study included 277 patients who underwent total resection for colorectal cancer. Patients were retrospectively divided into three groups: without complications (<i>n</i>=227), with anastomotic leakage (<i>n</i>=30), and other postoperative complications (<i>n</i>=20). CRP and IL-6 were measured daily for 5 postoperative days. Dynamics of markers and their diagnostic significance were estimated using ROC analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Serum IL-6 in patients with anastomotic leakage reached significant values after 2 postoperative days (AUC=0.872, cut-off=51.2 pg/ml, sensitivity 79.3%, specificity 89.1%) and maximum after 3 days (AUC=0.949, cut-off=66.4 pg/ml, sensitivity 80.0%, specificity 96.8%). CRP demonstrated diagnostically significant values after 3-4 days (AUC=0.875 after 3 days and 0.926 after 4 days). Dynamics of IL-6 after intervention for anastomotic leakage indicated advisability of this marker to assess the quality of abdominal debridement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IL-6 is a perspective early marker of anastomotic leakage with high sensitivity and specificity after 2 days. This significantly reduces the diagnostic time compared to CRP. IL-6 can optimize postoperative management of patients contributing to early detection of complications and timely intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":35986,"journal":{"name":"Khirurgiya","volume":" 9","pages":"87-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Khirurgiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202509187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate diagnostic significance of IL-6 compared to CRP for early detection of anastomotic leakage after colon resection for colorectal cancer.
Material and methods: The study included 277 patients who underwent total resection for colorectal cancer. Patients were retrospectively divided into three groups: without complications (n=227), with anastomotic leakage (n=30), and other postoperative complications (n=20). CRP and IL-6 were measured daily for 5 postoperative days. Dynamics of markers and their diagnostic significance were estimated using ROC analysis.
Results: Serum IL-6 in patients with anastomotic leakage reached significant values after 2 postoperative days (AUC=0.872, cut-off=51.2 pg/ml, sensitivity 79.3%, specificity 89.1%) and maximum after 3 days (AUC=0.949, cut-off=66.4 pg/ml, sensitivity 80.0%, specificity 96.8%). CRP demonstrated diagnostically significant values after 3-4 days (AUC=0.875 after 3 days and 0.926 after 4 days). Dynamics of IL-6 after intervention for anastomotic leakage indicated advisability of this marker to assess the quality of abdominal debridement.
Conclusion: IL-6 is a perspective early marker of anastomotic leakage with high sensitivity and specificity after 2 days. This significantly reduces the diagnostic time compared to CRP. IL-6 can optimize postoperative management of patients contributing to early detection of complications and timely intervention.