Does Physical Activity Intensity Matter? Longitudinal Evidence From a 5-Wave National Chinese Cohort on Chronic Disease Prevalence.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Qiang Wang, Mingda Wang, Xing Zhang, Xueshi Wang
{"title":"Does Physical Activity Intensity Matter? Longitudinal Evidence From a 5-Wave National Chinese Cohort on Chronic Disease Prevalence.","authors":"Qiang Wang, Mingda Wang, Xing Zhang, Xueshi Wang","doi":"10.1123/jpah.2025-0284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As China's population ages, chronic noncommunicable diseases have become increasingly prevalent. While physical activity (PA) is known to reduce disease risk, the role of intensity-light, moderate, or vigorous-remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using 5 waves (2011-2020) of China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study data (N = 54,300), this study examined associations between PA intensity and the prevalence of 13 chronic diseases. Physical activity was self-reported and categorized by intensity; disease outcomes were also self-reported. Generalized estimating equations were applied to control for demographic and behavioral covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Vigorous PA was associated with lower odds of hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, stroke, mental disorders, and asthma but was associated with higher odds of arthritis, digestive, kidney, and liver diseases. Moderate PA reduced the risk of hypertension and stroke, while light PA was positively associated with several chronic conditions, possibly reflecting reverse causality. Several associations changed direction after covariate adjustment, underscoring the importance of multivariable modeling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, an intensity-dependent relationship was observed, with vigorous activity offering the most consistent benefits. These findings suggest that public health interventions should emphasize activity intensity to better tailor chronic disease prevention strategies in aging populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of physical activity & health","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of physical activity & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2025-0284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As China's population ages, chronic noncommunicable diseases have become increasingly prevalent. While physical activity (PA) is known to reduce disease risk, the role of intensity-light, moderate, or vigorous-remains unclear.

Methods: Using 5 waves (2011-2020) of China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study data (N = 54,300), this study examined associations between PA intensity and the prevalence of 13 chronic diseases. Physical activity was self-reported and categorized by intensity; disease outcomes were also self-reported. Generalized estimating equations were applied to control for demographic and behavioral covariates.

Results: Vigorous PA was associated with lower odds of hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, stroke, mental disorders, and asthma but was associated with higher odds of arthritis, digestive, kidney, and liver diseases. Moderate PA reduced the risk of hypertension and stroke, while light PA was positively associated with several chronic conditions, possibly reflecting reverse causality. Several associations changed direction after covariate adjustment, underscoring the importance of multivariable modeling.

Conclusion: Overall, an intensity-dependent relationship was observed, with vigorous activity offering the most consistent benefits. These findings suggest that public health interventions should emphasize activity intensity to better tailor chronic disease prevention strategies in aging populations.

运动强度重要吗?来自中国慢性病患病率五波队列的纵向证据。
背景:随着中国人口老龄化,慢性非传染性疾病日益普遍。虽然已知体育活动(PA)可以降低疾病风险,但强度(轻度、中度或剧烈)的作用仍不清楚。方法:利用中国健康与退休纵向研究的5波(2011-2020)数据(N = 54300),研究PA强度与13种慢性疾病患病率的关系。身体活动是自我报告的,并按强度分类;疾病结果也是自我报告的。应用广义估计方程控制人口统计学和行为协变量。结果:剧烈的PA与高血压、糖尿病、心脏病、中风、精神障碍和哮喘的几率较低相关,但与关节炎、消化系统疾病、肾脏和肝脏疾病的几率较高相关。中度PA降低了高血压和中风的风险,而轻度PA与几种慢性疾病呈正相关,可能反映了反向因果关系。协变量调整后,一些关联改变了方向,强调了多变量建模的重要性。结论:总体而言,观察到强度依赖关系,剧烈运动提供最一致的益处。这些发现表明,公共卫生干预应强调活动强度,以更好地为老年人制定慢性病预防策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of physical activity & health
Journal of physical activity & health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physical Activity and Health (JPAH) publishes original research and review papers examining the relationship between physical activity and health, studying physical activity as an exposure as well as an outcome. As an exposure, the journal publishes articles examining how physical activity influences all aspects of health. As an outcome, the journal invites papers that examine the behavioral, community, and environmental interventions that may affect physical activity on an individual and/or population basis. The JPAH is an interdisciplinary journal published for researchers in fields of chronic disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信